Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck
Torontonians are not outdoorsy. Quebecers are very outdoorsy. I, personally, am outdoorsy, and the thing I envy the most about Quebec is their excellent national parks system (SEPAQ), but few Torontonians I've talked to who have visited Quebec bring this up.
|
Reminds me of recent conversations I had with colleagues based in Toronto. I mentioned the SEPAQ parks (du Bic, Grands Jardin, Jacques Cartier, Fjord du Saugenay, Hautes-Gorge, de la Gaspesie, Mont-Megantic, Mt-Orfond etc.) that I've visited since COVID, but none of them had heard about these parks, and conceptually couldn't wrap their heads around the fact that Montreal and Quebec City is surrounded by spectacular nature.
All they're familiar with is Algonquin Park and maybe Killarney, French River for the better travelled. But none of them even knew where Pink Lake and le Parc de la Gatineau is. They also didn't know Tremblant is actually a SEPAQ park.
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Brisavoine
Yeah, Vancouver looked like a very outdoorsy place when I visited. Much much more so than Seattle. If Toronto is as little outdoorsy as Seattle, then that sucks, as I'm a very outdoorsy person too (which kind of sucks in Paris too of course, but at least we have great ancient royal forests and woods all around the city if you care to go beyond the central areas, whereas Toronto doesn't seem to have much in terms of forests or nature areas in its metro area).
|
Toronto's much less outdoorsy than Seattle at least in my experience. At least in Seattle, I found a lot of people were at least familiar with the trails/parks in PNW, and had done some exploring nearby, up in Vancouver and Coastal BC or down in Oregon. Toronto's conception of nature literally revolves around one provincial park (Algonquin), Muskoka and Niagara Falls...it's as bad as Chicago.