I agree with everything you said. I've made the point myself that the street lighting on Highfield should be upgraded. It is surprisingly dark given the fact it is a north-south connector that leads directly to the Avenir Centre. They should make sure upgrading Highfield is a major part of the St. George Street makeover.
The section of St. George that requires special care is the section two blocks on either side of Highfield Street. This is where the most interesting shops and restaurants are.
You are quite right that the best way to build a lively street is with a resident population. Mixed use residential (low to mid rise) should absolutely be encouraged.
And, I'll say it again, they can't turn St. George soley into a pedestrian/cyclist paradise. Two way vehicular traffic will have to be maintained to facilitate visitation from other parts of the city, and to encourage residential development along the thoroughfare. You might have a condo on St. George, but you might also have a car, and will want a street so that you can access your underground parking.
Finally, vehicular access is important for business deliveries. Cycling activists sometimes forget this.........
Quote:
|
We're looking at an Improvement Plan to build on previous studies and prepare three redevelopment scenarios for the implementation of a multi-year revitalization project. The scenarios will explore innovative approaches that treat the street as a space for people, as well as accommodate the movement of residents and visitors in the downtown core without using a car. Active transportation will be at the heart of the options for the St. George Improvement Plan, shaping a space where moving on foot, by bike, with mobility-aid devices, by e-scooter and e-bike, or skating and rolling, is the best experience possible.
|
This paragraph has me very concerned. It seems to treat the car as the common enemy.