HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2024, 12:43 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Perhaps Google is tricking my eyes, but Connors Road on streetview looks much less steep than E 3rd or E Keith.

...

My extremely rough calculations based on topography have the E 3rd hill with a 9% average grade and the steep section of E Keith from Heywood to Cloverley with a 12% grade! The peak slope is certainly higher since those roads are definitely not linearly slopey.

I'm not sure what the steepest part of Connors Road is but it seems pretty gradual and the stretch from the footbridge up to 95th is around 4% grade on average which is pretty typical for dedicated passenger rail.
I think the Google cycling directions has fairly accurate elevation changes. From the 94/95 intersection up to the pedestrian bridge it's like 28m over 700 m.

From Kennard up to Queensbury on East 3rd is like 51m over a similar distance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.