HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2601  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2024, 3:41 PM
Glenn99 Glenn99 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by HydraY View Post
Google Maps has no idea how to deal with St. Mary's Overpass
I think it's been fixed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2602  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2024, 6:50 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Also to note those pudles on that bridge at 5-8inches deep taring into the wood deck if u didnt slow done u will damage ur car this bridge is a ongoing constant mess of cold pack patches that fail everytime it rains
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2603  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2024, 5:15 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 758
After 1ajs mentioned the Lynn Lake bridge myself and others did some research on the Northern Road network. With some design, demographic, and construction ideas. Super top level.

It's a big project that needs clever ideas to slash costs. But it's kind of quietly in motion. Curious if others have better ideas, local knowledge, or prioritization ideas based off the data.

https://stroadz.glide.page/dl/d0a5f4/s/c0a8e8/r/7IbU0nwDVOR7QuUQQ3fq
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2604  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2024, 11:38 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
thatsa central mb and needs roads bad. proper survays need be done as these winter roads dont tend to fallow the eskers and hard ground witch plagues the 394 with its areas that are at water level in the swamps and its closed most of the time cause theres no one to keep up with maintince and the provinces wount pay to build it back up since it goes into sask
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2605  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 2:06 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
its the longest free standing bridge in manitoba as well

and for the last several yrs theres been a slated next year for rehab posting on their map but nothings ever happend such poor planning with the mine about to start construction........ and the supper B's of lime that come up all summer and still comming up atm
IIRC that one is being replaced. Or rehab. There was an RFP some time ago for engineering work on a major bridge in the north and I thought it was that one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2606  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 10:13 PM
cllew cllew is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,848
I see the Lynn Lake bridge issue made the 5pm CTV news.

I thought only the Free Press had somebody peeking in here from time to time for news ideas?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2607  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 12:45 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
IIRC that one is being replaced. Or rehab. There was an RFP some time ago for engineering work on a major bridge in the north and I thought it was that one.
Been discussion ongoing with that bridge and rfp's going back a few years now. Rakowski won a bid to tare it down i was told by tristen but never happened. Few years back as part of a replacement rfp that never made it past design.

And to add to the issue Highways is short staffed. And they only have access to cold pack stock pile thats getting to be 2 yrs old now i beleave so its not holding up as well specialy when we get rain. And untill the waters gone from that mess it aint going to fix anything were getting closer and closer to frost season been a warm september

Ill be driving over that bridge tomarroww so ill get a first hand look at this. That bridge is an ongoing constant cat and mouse game of patching for the crew
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2608  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 1:10 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
I see the Lynn Lake bridge issue made the 5pm CTV news.

I thought only the Free Press had somebody peeking in here from time to time for news ideas?

It was all over fb since last week as well and someone localy may of contacted ctvy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2609  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2024, 1:12 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Crew patched it with cold pack in the rain was already crumbing when i drove back to lynn
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2610  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:28 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,286
Why are they redoing Highway 10 from Brandon to Highway 25 already?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2611  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 5:30 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Why are they redoing Highway 10 from Brandon to Highway 25 already?
prolly done wrong?

like 391 from thompson to nelson house where its falling apart and its only 3 4 yrs old
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2612  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 7:04 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carboy15 View Post
I personally think Highway 16 and 1 need an interchange way more than this. But an interchange should get built there soon. I wish Canada would come up with a National Freeway System analogous to the Interstate or Autobahn. A federally funded Highway system. Yes, we have the National Highway system, but what the heck is that? It has no national standards at all. Canadian Highways are still in the US Route days (like Route 66). Ontario 400 Highways and Autoroutes of Quebec don't count as a National Freeway system. We need it Nationwide
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
Agreed.

I mean we have one friggin coast-to-coast highway, and we can't even fully twin it, let alone, make it a limited-access freeway. We're supposed to be one of the richest countries in the World. Considering the terrain the the TCH passes through, and the need to safely transport goods and cargo, one would think this would ahve been completed in the 1960's.
Agreed x2.
I feel the same frustration with this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2613  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 7:46 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Agreed x2.
I feel the same frustration with this.
Ditto.

The reason that roads are the jurisdiction of the provinces is the constitution of canada (or at least that would be what is cited to justify letting the provinces take care of their own roads). In reality, at least one system should be federally mandated as rising to the level of national importance (an exception to the rule that property and civil rights or matters of local import are the exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces). I can imagine that the government of Canada should identify a core system of critical trade routes as being of national importance (including at least one contiguous coast to coast corridor) and take the steps necessary to get it done. I believe we are the only G7 country that does not have some form of national expressway system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2614  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2024, 12:07 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
prolly done wrong?

like 391 from thompson to nelson house where its falling apart and its only 3 4 yrs old
Doesn't seem to be falling apart to me. Maybe it's part of the program to increase load limits? The same will happen to 227 that was just redone west of PTH 6.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2615  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2024, 12:08 AM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 758
In addition to nationalizing the TCH, and pre-designated trade corridor should be established at the Federal Level. All land agreements, routes, and royalties pre-negotiated.

Say 2km wide. From BC tidewater deep into Sask/MB. Or even cross Canada.

If any pipeline, powerline, rail line, data line, highway, or any other trade medium wants to build; it gets rubber stamp approval. No protests or permissions because everything is pre-agreed.

Just keep stacking lines inside this corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2616  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2024, 1:58 AM
Runt Runt is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 92
bodaggin bodaggin is online now
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 356
Don't worry 1ajs, MTI is spending $35 million to fix the Highway 34 bridge over the Assiniboine, with 250AADT and alternate options 20km on each side.

... Instead of fixing critical sole access points to northern communities and their GDP contributing mines, like this bridge.

Ohh our MTI are such shrewd capital allocators.




Gotta call this comment out....
those 250 vehicles are mostly commercial.

I know that my company crosses 6-10 feed trucks a day over that bridge.
The value of 1 load is anywhere between 65,000 and 100,000 CDN Dollars.
We also cross 7-10 loads of hogs.
Average value of those loads are 70,000 to 85,000 per load.
That's in the neighborhood of 1.2 / 1/5 Million dollars a day.
This is not counting our competitor in Brandon, with their Feed/Hogs or
the numerous grain hauling outfits in Western Manitoba.
The Value of goods going over that bridge-- Daily-- easily justify the fix!

Its 32 KMS to Hwy 5, and this does not account for Spring RD conditions that force everyone further west to HWY 10. Hwy 34 and for that matter Hwy 5 should be RTAC highways. Extra mile mean extra fuel and in trucking those miles add up.
We need that 34 bridge fixed.

Traffic counts should not be the only metric to RD infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2617  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2024, 2:33 AM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Runt View Post
bodaggin bodaggin is online now
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 356
Don't worry 1ajs, MTI is spending $35 million to fix the Highway 34 bridge over the Assiniboine, with 250AADT and alternate options 20km on each side.

... Instead of fixing critical sole access points to northern communities and their GDP contributing mines, like this bridge.

Ohh our MTI are such shrewd capital allocators.




Gotta call this comment out....
those 250 vehicles are mostly commercial.

I know that my company crosses 6-10 feed trucks a day over that bridge.
The value of 1 load is anywhere between 65,000 and 100,000 CDN Dollars.
We also cross 7-10 loads of hogs.
Average value of those loads are 70,000 to 85,000 per load.
That's in the neighborhood of 1.2 / 1/5 Million dollars a day.
This is not counting our competitor in Brandon, with their Feed/Hogs or
the numerous grain hauling outfits in Western Manitoba.
The Value of goods going over that bridge-- Daily-- easily justify the fix!

Its 32 KMS to Hwy 5, and this does not account for Spring RD conditions that force everyone further west to HWY 10. Hwy 34 and for that matter Hwy 5 should be RTAC highways. Extra mile mean extra fuel and in trucking those miles add up.
We need that 34 bridge fixed.

Traffic counts should not be the only metric to RD infrastructure.
Good point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2618  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2024, 4:49 AM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Runt View Post

I know that my company crosses 6-10 feed trucks a day over that bridge.
The value of 1 load is anywhere between 65,000 and 100,000 CDN Dollars.
We also cross 7-10 loads of hogs.
Average value of those loads are 70,000 to 85,000 per load.
That's in the neighborhood of 1.2 / 1/5 Million dollars a day.
This is not counting our competitor in Brandon, with their Feed/Hogs or
the numerous grain hauling outfits in Western Manitoba.
The Value of goods going over that bridge-- Daily-- easily justify the fix!

Its 32 KMS to Hwy 5, and this does not account for Spring RD conditions that force everyone further west to HWY 10. Hwy 34 and for that matter Hwy 5 should be RTAC highways. Extra mile mean extra fuel and in trucking those miles add up.
We need that 34 bridge fixed.

Traffic counts should not be the only metric to RD infrastructure.
And would you like to know the value of potatoes that runs down Highway 5 across TCH to McCain's on a daily basis? Far more. Plus the value of lives.

Highway 242 is only 16km to the East. What's the origin and destination of your trip?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2619  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2024, 1:09 PM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 916
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodaggin View Post
And would you like to know the value of potatoes that runs down Highway 5 across TCH to McCain's on a daily basis? Far more. Plus the value of lives.

Highway 242 is only 16km to the East. What's the origin and destination of your trip?
I have no skin in this discussion and don’t think I’ve ever travelled either highway, but based on his comments (feed, hogs, competitor in Brandon) I suspect the destination of his trips is the Hylife plant in Neepawa. If so, the value of the product arriving and leaving that site is an order of magnitude greater than the potatoes and fries leaving Carberry.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2620  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2024, 2:14 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodaggin View Post
And would you like to know the value of potatoes that runs down Highway 5 across TCH to McCain's on a daily basis? Far more. Plus the value of lives.

Highway 242 is only 16km to the East. What's the origin and destination of your trip?
that 16kms can turn into 30-100km round trip pritty quik. and when u have big trucks... u cant just take any roads some are restriced and then u get weight reductions at times it can force u to add 100km to ur round trip or more pritty quick.



sigersons supost to be replacing a bridge at cockeram creak on the 391 8miles from town finaly starting next month. that one is heaved up so u have to slam on ur breaks if u dont know about it going south or risk destroying ur struts and ball joints from hitting the 6in sharp rise with ur tires where the road meets the bridge
highways finaly put some cold pack to ramp it this yr but it keeps shifting up
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:18 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.