Quote:
Originally Posted by NB_ExistsToo
If you really wanted Fredericton North votes, the easiest, most cost effective way to win over their hearts would be to push for a secondary walking bridge. The piles are already there and it would promote a green initiative of cycling/walking instead of driving. Plus I vaguely remember a report saying it would be a couple million (opposed to the ridiculous costs of a third bridge)
|
Sounds entirely reasonable. We have similar situation where the West Set is cut off from Uptown. At its closest points, there's 500 meters separating the West Side Peninsula from the Central Uptown Peninsula. Yet if you want to walk between these two points, it could take up to 2 hours each way, as pedestrians and cyclists are both banned from using the harbour bridge. Yet the resident "realists" on this forum says it's too cost prohibitive to add a cycling or pedestrian lane to the Harbour Bridge, and any mention of bringing back the cross harbour ferry laughed off as entirely unrealistic, even though a cross harbour ferry operated for more than a century between Uptown and the West Side.
Meanwhile, the Province supports 5 commuter ferries that are almost exclusively used by car commuters within the Greater Saint John area, which are free of charge to use. The Tax payers of NB are paying for people to live way out in places like Long Reach or the Kingston Peninsula and take cable ferries free of charge to work and play in Saint John, but when it's suggested the province pay for a pedestrian/bicycle ferry for residents and visitors of Canada's oldest city with second largest port, it's a a wasteful expense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NB_ExistsToo
Because, as of right now, if you're on the Northside on Cliff Street (or anywhere in the Devon region), it takes around an additional 35min to walk to downtown.
if you LEGALLY want to bike to the Southside, you are required to use the walking bridge.
The current walking bridge is on the outskirts and is frequently used. There would be a considerable increase downtown workers that would choose walking if their walk decreased by 30-40min (1-1.5hr per day) and could save money by no longer needing to pay for daily parking.
Also, if you want to be critical, you could at least have a relatively accurate distance, which is 1.1km away.
|
Sounds like a very reasonable, worthwhile solution. I've often wondered what the point of those piers on the river in Fredericton were for, turning them into something more useful like a pedestrian/cycling bridge would be brilliant. I'm sure our resident PC propagandists will ignore most of what you've stated here and go on about how unrealistic investing in active transportation infrastructure and better public transportation is, etc, etc.
It's strange how on a sub forum pretty well dedicated to development within our cities and people claiming to want to see our cities be better, more livable places to live, there's such opposition to ideas and investments that would actually make out cities more livable, better places to live.