CHICAGO | Riverline | 8 Towers | 600FT - 500FT(X2) - 380FT(X2) - 242FT(X2) - 300FT~

[intrepidDesign]

Originally Posted by Jibba

Praise be.

Amen. God what an awful design. Maybe it was a placeholder?? Why would you ever wrap a park with parking garages, and with a view of the river? Sure what's on the west bank of the river isn't great but it won't always be there I would imagine. Naw, the base of whatever gets built there should be like the Cooper, parking wrapped in townhomes.

[r18tdi]

New info and images of Riverline "Building G," via Urbanize Chicago:

https://chicago.urbanize.city/post/site-plan-approval-secured-first-building-riverline

[gebs]

Yessss, keep building up the South Loop.

[lakeshoredrive]

Wasted opportunity

[Randomguy34]

Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive

Wasted opportunity

Don't forget that much of the site is landfill, so the southern site can't build as many highrises as the northern half. Plus the southern half will still have Manhattan level densities of >100k ppl/sq mi, even with the townhomes

[Randomguy34]

CDOT is FINALLY moving forward with the Taylor St bridge





https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city...0-08_4A-CDOTTaylorStreetBridge_Patel.pdf

[munchymunch]

That’s awesome, curious how the design will look, hopefully it’ll complement our cities many great bridges.

[moorhosj1]

It was always on this timeline. It has been a line item in the TIF funding plan for years. You can see the money allocated for study/design in 2024, then the money for construction in 2026-2027.

[left of center]

Wouldn't a Polk St. bridge make more sense? Polk street goes further into the South Loop, terminating at State Street. Taylor would terminate immediately after crossing the river at Wells.

I imagine CDOT's reasoning is that Taylor would help shuttle more cars to 90/94, whereas neighborhood connectivity is more of an afterthought. The fact that Roosevelt is an absolute sh*tshow during rush hour means they probably have a point in that regard.

In an ideal world with infinite resources, we would get both bridges built.

[r18tdi]

Originally Posted by left of center

Wouldn't a Polk St. bridge make more sense? Polk street goes further into the South Loop, terminating at State Street. Taylor would terminate immediately after crossing the river at Wells.

I imagine CDOT's reasoning is that Taylor would help shuttle more cars to 90/94, whereas neighborhood connectivity is more of an afterthought. The fact that Roosevelt is an absolute sh*tshow during rush hour means they probably have a point in that regard.

In an ideal world with infinite resources, we would get both bridges built.

Polk has some challenges, too. On the West side of the river, it terminates into a heavily trafficked multilane loading ramp for the massive USPS facility there. On the east side, the street is narrow and serves primarily as a dead-end access for The Reed at Southbank. I believe a pier and water taxi stop are planned here as well. I'm not saying it's impossible, but the current conditions/use would need to be addressed.

[ithakas]

If feasible, I think the city should tunnel under the Metra tracks at 9th to connect it with Clark and create another east-west connection between Polk and Roosevelt (since Roosevelt is elevated, there won't be another east-west connection from Wells until you go south to maybe 15th Street?).

The city needs to slow down traffic at Clark and Polk anyway—Clark was designed as a feeder decades ago but now has a walkable dense neighborhood around it, and drivers are too aggressive here—so adding a traffic light at 9th & Clark would also help with that.

[Randomguy34]

Construction permit issued for 1010 S Wells

[BVictor1]

Some updated renderings on Chicago Yimby

Originally Posted by Randomguy34

Construction permit issued for 1010 S Wells

https://chicagoyimby.com/2024/11/new-ren...-a8FMuWMfqh9A_aem_hN3wTdkadSQJ75e-8Wr85g

[left of center]

Wow, looks much better. Ditched its 70s Miami condo tower vibe for something a lot more modern and refreshing. Makes me wish it was significantly taller now

[Bombardier]

Reminds me of Block 37.

[pilsenarch]

As far as I can tell from the site plans, this appears to land in the middle of a future ROW for a possible Taylor Street bridge over the river... please tell me I am wrong...

[Randomguy34]

This won't interfere with the planned Taylor St bridge. Here's the recent site plan of 1010 S Wells, Taylor St is being accommodated


https://chicago.urbanize.city/post/site-plan-approval-secured-first-building-riverline

[ardecila]

Originally Posted by Randomguy34

This won't interfere with the planned Taylor St bridge. Here's the recent site plan of 1010 S Wells, Taylor St is being accommodated

I expect this will change a bit, which is why the building has a pretty generous setback on the north side and the landscaping is likely temporary.

A 40' right of way is not enough for the bridge approach with sidewalks, bike lanes, multiple car turn lanes, etc. There's a note in the PD filing landscape plan showing a proposed dedication of 50' which will take out the whole north setback area, but will give CDOT 90' to work with for the bridge approach.

Roosevelt doesn't connect to Wells, so if the 78 gets developed (especially with a stadium) this will be one of only two routes from the development to the expressway. Could be quite a busy intersection on game days. This will also be an operable bridge, so it will likely include at least one or two new bridge houses.

[Randomguy34]

^ Looks like CDOT will in fact acquire a portion of land south of Taylor St (PIN: 17-16-416-004-0000) for the bridge: https://chicityclerkelms.chicago.gov/Matter/?matterId=E0F51B72-FDAC-EF11-B8E9-001DD809A88D

It doesn't specify how much they'll acquire, since the PIN encompasses a giant portion of land. As ardecila suggested, it'll likely just be the setbacks to the north of 1010 S Wells.

[BVictor1]

Saw a bit of activity on the site today.

12.13.24