Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal
Well the situation is worse than predicted and nobody promises bad news. But it was pretty clear what we were going to get. He promised 2.5% and mild austerity. Mckenney promised 3.5% and no cuts. Clearly we would be looking at big tax increases if she had been elected and smaller cuts. We will now get a bit more tax increases than promised and bigger cuts.
All of this is clearly what the bulk of voters in the city who pay taxes drive to work a couple days of week and rarely use transit want. You can claim better service takes cars off the road and makes their commute better but this is mostly not true and certainly doens't resonate. Even if it was true most suburbanites aren't going to pay $300 a year more in taxes to save 5 minutes. Of course transit users might but even many of them are not impacted by cuts or just prefer the cash.
|
Anecdotal sure but if you read the comments on posts by the City or local politicians across all platforms (mainly FB) it's overwhelmingly people complaining about the state of transit or traffic (which is tied to transit). I simply don't believe most residents understand the real-world consequences of tax promises that may initially seem appealing on paper.
Yes I agree people voted for 2.5% and that's democracy but who isn't going to take the carrot when you dangle it in front of them? My point is that politicians need to recognize their place as stewards of the city and understand that residents who vote for low taxes are doing so with a degree of trust that politicians aren't handicapping our city in the process.
Instead, Sutcliffe wanted to be the hero who could keep taxes low while maintaining a functional city and now that it's blowing up in his face, he's running around pointing fingers, further misleading the average resident who doesn't know any better.