HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


View Poll Results: Should Portage and Main be open for pedestrian traffic?
Yes 113 92.62%
No 9 7.38%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1701  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 4:44 PM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 887
Are the blue areas on three of the four corners the current accesses to the underground...and if so, what happens to them? Assuming they will stay open until the concourse is closed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1702  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 6:37 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
Ya those are the entrances.

It's not a small amount of work to reconfigure, especially that corner as they're reconfig's the traffic lanes.

Are the barriers coming down completely? Or just being cut open to allow people through?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1703  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 7:20 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post

Are the barriers coming down completely? Or just being cut open to allow people through?
Removed, waterproofed and then install sidewalk and curb. There is also mention of some bollards in places.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1704  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 7:28 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
I'm slightly confused by the whole thing. Are they implementing all the fancy pictures from the recent studies?

So after all that studying, traffic nightmare, transit nightmare. We're simply opening the corners with minor change to lane configuration?

Will it be pedestrian nightmare now? Or like what will happen when BRT comes through there. Blow it all up again? Is the underground closing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1705  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 8:22 PM
anthonyk anthonyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: SE Manitoba
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I'm slightly confused by the whole thing. Are they implementing all the fancy pictures from the recent studies?

So after all that studying, traffic nightmare, transit nightmare. We're simply opening the corners with minor change to lane configuration?
This is a temporary [i.e. permanent] fix to ensure its open to pedestrians for the restructured transit network that goes into service next summer. Final design is to be determined.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1706  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 12:41 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,912
My understanding is that the current concrete barriers have considerable leak issues and need to be removed. They are going with an easy and relatively cheap solution to remove the barriers, waterproof the damaged areas and replace with curbing and new traffic and pedestrian signalization. This low cost project will allow the intersection to be open to pedestrians. This does not address the significant issue of the underground water issues in the Portage and Main Circus. That will need to be addressed with a much larger budget and or maybe the closing and infill of the facility in the future.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1707  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 2:04 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,522
closing the underground would be a huge short sited mistake
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1708  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 4:52 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,052
^ they won't...it just won't be the city paying to keep it open.

looks like no more right turn from main to portage east.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1709  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 4:54 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,052
they should ban the left turn from main to bannatyne.....that creates a big line up that slows portage and main.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1710  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 6:06 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,367
Looks like the City is relocating the Great War memorial statue in front of the Bank of Montreal to Brookfield Cemetery. What a shame. Apparently there isn't room for it there once the renewal of P&M is complete but that statue should remain prominent and not somewhere that most of the city will never see it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1711  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 7:01 PM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Looks like the City is relocating the Great War memorial statue in front of the Bank of Montreal to Brookfield Cemetery. What a shame. Apparently there isn't room for it there once the renewal of P&M is complete but that statue should remain prominent and not somewhere that most of the city will never see it.
Surely they could find somewhere more prominent for it than a cemetery by the airport.
__________________
"Build baby build."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1712  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 7:17 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Surely they could find somewhere more prominent for it than a cemetery by the airport.
Exactly. At least on the Legislative Grounds or along Memorial Blvd by the Central Cenotaph. Seems disrespectful to hide a beautiful statue commemorating our martial heritage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1713  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 8:48 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,402
No shit, that’s so weak!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1714  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 8:54 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Surely they could find somewhere more prominent for it than a cemetery by the airport.
Probably the Winnipeg public service thought that because the Brookside Cemetery's Field of Honour has the oldest / largest Military interment site in Canada that a military statue commemorating the loss of Bank of Montreal employee's in World War 1 may be a good fit if it has to be moved somewhere from it current location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1715  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 8:59 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
Probably somebody in the Winnipeg public service thought that because the Brookside Cemetery Field of Honour has the oldest / largest Military interment site in Canada that a military statue may be a good fit.
Granted but to relocate a well-known landmark commemorating our fallen to somewhere almost noone will see it is uncool in my opinion. It's an "if a tree falls in the woods" scenario. Canadians are almost never exposed to our military history and the current military as it is, this only lessens the visibility further.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1716  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 9:23 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Granted but to relocate a well-known landmark commemorating our fallen to somewhere almost noone will see it is uncool in my opinion. It's an "if a tree falls in the woods" scenario. Canadians are almost never exposed to our military history and the current military as it is, this only lessens the visibility further.
Apparently the Field of Honour gets a fair amount of people coming there interested in military history.

City of Winnipeg web site says they have ongoing tours and events there through out the year. There was big one in the evening of Sept 10/24 as part of Winnipeg 150 events.

I can't remember if its this location or the smaller field of honour in Transcona Cemetery that gets bus loads of school kids each year before Nov 11 to get a historical tour from military veterans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1717  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 9:34 PM
zalf zalf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 869
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
Apparently the Field of Honour gets a fair amount of people coming there interested in military history.
Sort of preaching to the choir then.

I think the Legislative grounds would be idea. Assiniboine Park, alternatively.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1718  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 9:48 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
It's not 'just a cemetery by the airport'. Like ya it's not a public square. But have some respect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1719  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 11:16 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by zalf View Post
Sort of preaching to the choir then.

I think the Legislative grounds would be idea. Assiniboine Park, alternatively.
I can see some community activist groups complaining that the monument would be "militarizing" those two locations.

Maybe it would be a good fit in front of Minto Armoury or Lieutenant-Colonel Harcus Strachan, VC, MC Armoury (aka McGregor Armoury). The Canadian Armed Forces would probably be willing to accept it for display for its historic value.

Or if more viability is desired maybe in the green space around Ness & Conway by 17 Wing. The is already the static jet display there so there would be a bit of a military tie in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1720  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 12:29 AM
zalf zalf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 869
I mean, we don't have to cave to whoever is loudest on twitter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.