Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut
Yes and no - there's been a few cases where provincial justices have all agreed that certain people are liable to reoffend and shouldn't be let out... but due to Bill C-75 (let them go until their court date because the jails are full, a.k.a."catch and release") or pressure from the feds, they're encouraged to do so anyway.
|
To be clear, the jails aren't full, or if they are, it is because we made a choice (closed facilities / failed to expand in line with population growth).
Per Statscan, the incarceration rate was 72 per 100k in 2022/2023 - aside from 2020/2021 and 2021/2022, this is by far the lowest rate in the data series (goes back to 1978/1979). The rate has bounced around between 79 to 90 for decades before it plunged from 79 in 2019/2020 to 62 in 2020/2021 following implementation of Bill C-75 in 2019.
Bill C-48 was passed in Jan 2024, reversing some of the bail provisions of Bill C-75.
Poster svlt was asking earlier in the thread who even opposes longer sentences for repeat offenders, so here is a typical example I found when looking up the stats above.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatche...make-communities-safer-experts-1.7077332
The headline reads: "New bail reform law and policing won't fix root causes of violent offenders, Sask. experts say"
Meanwhile the sub-head: "RCMP data says almost
half of Sask. homicide charges were against people on bail or parole"
Here is a quote:
"Criminal lawyer and sexual violence researcher Cassandra Richardson said Bill C-48 doesn't address root causes of crime, particularly for domestic violence.
"Poverty, mental health, substance abuse, that's what really we need to look at," Richardson said.
...
"I have concerns that Bill C-48 might just delay the next assault, it might not address the root causes," she said."
See, if you keep a repeat offender incarcerated for a while, it only delays their next assault, and that is bad because it doesn't address the root cause...