Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend
https://globalnews.ca/news/10732611/...ous-incidents/
I'm glad to see a reasonable response to this violence from the chief of police.
I agree that this individual shouldn't be permitted to pose a future risk to society, and that they should get the healthcare treatment that they need. I would also hope the victims are well taken care of, because it's an understatement to call this a traumatic event.
|
Yes, it was good to see this from the police chief, although worrying to think he might have said something different if a different party was running the city. The good news is that (despite this horrible incident) the crime rate is coming down from its pandemic spike and BC/Vancouver are on pace for one of their lowest homicide rates in a long time.
The bad news is it could be so much better if we just took a harder line on locking up the relatively small number of people who commit repeated offenses (say, more than 10 as a starting point) - not for retribution, or to punish them, or for justice, or anything like that - just as a preventative matter to stop them from committing any more crimes. In this sense, it doesn't matter whether the person is 'criminally responsible' for their actions or not, all that matters is that they be prevented from committing more crimes.
Of course, it matters for how the repeat offender should be treated while incarcerated (eg mental facility vs regular prison, etc.) but not for the fact that they need to be incarcerated for a long time.
Politicians are afraid to confront the judiciary and their interpretation of the charter that focuses on the rights of the offenders, but I think the pendulum is swinging back towards an approach that puts public safety and order higher in the order of priorities.