Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis1400
The issue to me is bigger than the pelicans too. the current arena was built at a bad time and right before major changes in designs occurred so its bones are just not good enough to renovate and get a good bang for your buck and i also would like the arena to be somewhere easier to access the rest of the city grid. My guess is there is some potential for it to go where the convention center headquarter hotel was originally planned. since they are looking to build one now where the sugar mill is. it makes sense to me with all the parking the river district is going to have plus the new arena will be an extension of exhibit space for events too .. seems a win win. no one wants to just fund a new arena for a basketball team they are going to want to have an investment that results in more economic activity than just that which is why it needs to move to a spot where its not punished in the corner but feels like part of the city grid and creates activity in nearby restaurants etc
|
I can already hear the residents in the LGD complaining about the stadium being built in the River District
Besides traffic issues, it would take up a huge piece of the site and would be dormant more days than not. However, on those days when there are concerts and games, it would bring much needed energy to a new neighborhood trying to build itself up, which would be great.
Philadelphia is going through the same thing right now - they are looking at moving their arena from the stadium district to a more centralized downtown area. Lots of pushback from neighborhood groups regarding traffic, of course, even though their public transit is 100x better than ours. It comes down to whether you think arenas are good for neighborhoods (more people and activity) and should be built to help neighborhoods grow, or if they hurt neighborhoods (traffic, parking lots, and only sporadic usage) and should be clustered together in stadium districts.