HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2024, 5:10 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Have your say on this IMPORTANT issue:

https://engaged.edmonton.ca/centrecityparking


Purpose of Project

Planning policies and regulations restrict the creation of new surface parking lots in Centre City and have prevented a large number of legacy parking lots from obtaining a development permit. To balance parking availability in the core with the long-term goal of a dense, vibrant area, the City of Edmonton has created a time-limited program allowing some landowners to apply for a temporary development permit. No new parking lots will be created through this program.

Text Amendment

A proposed text amendment to Zoning Bylaw 20001 is required to introduce the Centre City Temporary Parking Use and associated regulations. The proposed Use will be added to the Medium Scale Residential (RM) Zone, Large Scale Residential (RL) Zone, Mixed Use (MU) Zone and Downtown Special Area Zones.

The following regulations are proposed for this new use to enhance the appearance and safety of parking lots within Centre City:

Maximum permit length (7-10 years)
Minimum setback requirements
Pathway requirements
Vehicle access and circulation requirements
Barrier-free parking space requirements
Site grading requirements
Lighting requirements
Landscaping requirements, such as minimum tree and shrub requirements
Direct Control Rezonings

Some existing parking lots are located within Direct Control (DC1) Zones. To allow for the new centre city temporary parking use on these sites, a rezoning of five Direct Control (DC1) Zones within Wîhkwêntôwin (Oliver), Central McDougall, and Queen Mary Park are required. The proposed rezonings include administrative updates to align with Zoning Bylaw 20001’s uses and general definitions. No changes to building height, scale, or intensity are proposed. The Proposed Rezoning Map and Zones can be found under the documents tab on the right.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2024, 5:11 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
*note the lack of proper 'hard surfacing' ie. paving requirements and ONLY grading wording.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2024, 5:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142


A dirt/gravel lot is simply not an acceptable 'hard surfacing' or appropriate anywhere in #YEGDT, graded or not.

While development plans are subject to changing market conditions where timing is critical, delays inevitable and flexibility needed for #developers, most of these lots have been bad neighbours for decades and undue a lot of the good work done throughout the #Downtown over the years by many, many others.

Having lived next to two dirt/gravel lots in a modern high-rise condo for two decades, these lots make neighbouring properties continuously filled with blown dust, drag mud onto sidewalks, alleyways and roadways following rainfall and become magnets for garbage and disorder, let alone the number of my guests who stepped out of their car into a muddy, wet, cold puddle in their dress shoes en route to a meeting in an office tower, off to the Citadel or a game. This IS the most basic example of the #brokenwindow theory.

Why is it that those who raise the bar for their properties, assets, investments; those who upkeep, maintain, wash, clean, have to deal with this lowest of low bar as neighbours? Why spend money on operations and maintenance if others simply do not care and are supported to do so by policy decisions?

It's time to require actual hard surfacing on these sites.

It's time for them to be accountable to their neighbours.

It's time to raise the bar for those visiting, working, being educated in and most importantly living there.

A well kept parking lot, is a safer lot, a more attractive lot, it will drive more revenue and might even attract a buyer for a higher an better use. A dirt/gravel lot in the core is akin to an overgrown yard with noxious weeds in other neighbourhoods.

You are better than that #Edmonton; first impressions are lasting. It's time to decide what kind of Downtown you want to be and what image you want to convey. Minimum standards and a legacy indeed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2024, 4:04 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Is this accurate?

---
A new report from the Canadian Venture Capital Association (CVCA) shows firms in Alberta raised $383 million during the first six months of the year.
​
Companies based in the city (Calgary) raised $346 million
​
346/383 = 90%

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstori...g-venture-capital-investment/ar-AA1oS0TL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2024, 4:53 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Is this accurate?

---
A new report from the Canadian Venture Capital Association (CVCA) shows firms in Alberta raised $383 million during the first six months of the year.
​
Companies based in the city (Calgary) raised $346 million
​
346/383 = 90%

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstori...g-venture-capital-investment/ar-AA1oS0TL
I had been hearing anecdotally that Calgary was getting a huge influx of vencap. It's not surprising they've gotten far more than Edmonton, but that number says a lot, if it's accurate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 1:05 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Is this accurate?

---
A new report from the Canadian Venture Capital Association (CVCA) shows firms in Alberta raised $383 million during the first six months of the year.
​
Companies based in the city (Calgary) raised $346 million
​
346/383 = 90%

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstori...g-venture-capital-investment/ar-AA1oS0TL
It's always been the case. But to be frank these dollar figures fluctuate a lot depending on various factors. A big deal such as Jobber raising $100M USD could swing the bar one way. You have to look at these on an aggregate basis over years, not months. Either way it's good to see this type of investment taking place in the province. Perhaps our government will recognize this and start to truly embrace the 'non-energy' sector.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 1:55 AM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
It's always been the case. But to be frank these dollar figures fluctuate a lot depending on various factors. A big deal such as Jobber raising $100M USD could swing the bar one way. You have to look at these on an aggregate basis over years, not months. Either way it's good to see this type of investment taking place in the province. Perhaps our government will recognize this and start to truly embrace the 'non-energy' sector.
You should of stopped at - it’s always been the case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 2:57 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
^ha.

^^Sure, but that is striking and a very significant issue if so, no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2024, 3:11 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2024, 4:05 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,858
That does look good. Lots happening again Last weekend in town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2024, 4:25 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,089
Yup, I was there Friday night and the vibes were great. Saturday night I checked out the Chinatown After Dark which was awesome and an event that I hope to see more than just once a year. That, plus the Pink concert, made for a very busy McCauley / Alberta Ave that evening, which was great to see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2024, 5:01 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Would it be helpful to do either an entrance or exit survey during events like that to determine where people are coming in from? Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 4:35 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,089
Not a bad idea at all, would be very interesting to know. My wife, kid and I walked from our place in Alberta Ave but we didn't see any other families walking south from there, but some very well could have just taken transit or driven.

Seems like many were utitlizing the Valley Line and Capital Lines from traffic to and from those stops.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 7:19 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,858
I look at that photo and see even a smallest number of people that discovered the symphony. and will buy a ticket or 2. its not expensive for a night out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2024, 2:45 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Absolutely agree.... The symphony and Opera resonate with me. It's a great time for the family.

https://youtu.be/6_RnrTGuzz0?si=iVwJJZ45r3HeeHoU

https://youtu.be/dnp-8GrHOIk?si=Th37JSh3li_zXgzj

Last edited by Black Star; Sep 7, 2024 at 2:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 4:28 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Edmonton was featured on the Amazing Race finale last night.

YEG-Stantec Tower-High Level Bridge-Whyte-Rad Torque-Butterdome- RAM-Commonwealth
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 6:12 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Edmonton was featured on the Amazing Race finale last night.

YEG-Stantec Tower-High Level Bridge-Whyte-Rad Torque-Butterdome- RAM-Commonwealth
Cool that it was the finale - Commonwealth is the solid spot for the winners to be crowned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 7:15 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
It made me think that underneath the HLB should always be used for a ropes adventure experience paired with some other cool activities to drive people to the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2024, 3:40 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
It made me think that underneath the HLB should always be used for a ropes adventure experience paired with some other cool activities to drive people to the area.
When houses used to be below the HLB the local kids would attach swings to the structural frames.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 1:44 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
CAPITAL AND OPERATING FUNDING SHORTFALL ANALYSIS

demonstrates how not all contributing factors to the fiscal gap are caused by the City, or are within the City’s control. Many are consequences of shifts in economic, social and environmental factors, or of actions and decisions made by higher-order governments. However, many are also internally-driven from decisions made over multiple years, and are within the City’s control to influence. The City must take measures to reduce the fiscal gap in areas which it has control over.

Legislation does not permit the City to budget for deficits. Consequently, the City’s fiscal gap materializes as reduced service levels, deteriorating infrastructure, above-average tax increases and the inability to advance its strategic goals. In contrast, because higher-order governments can incur budget deficits, their gaps between spending needs and revenue generation often materialize in the form of budget deficits, where spending is higher than revenues.

The fiscal gap is the difference between the City’s expenditure needs and its revenue capacity, for both capital and operating. At a very high level, there are two broad fiscal shifts the City must make in order to narrow or close the gap: grow its revenues where possible, and reduce its expenditure needs.
Some strategies that can help achieve these goals include:

1. Grow non-residential tax base: Take actions to address the City’s declining share of non-residential tax base in the region, and the insufficient levels of real non-residential assessment growth. On June 19, 2024 Administration presented FCS02483 Non-Residential Tax Base Growth Challenges and UPE01548 Industrial Investment Action Plan.

2. Evaluate all city-controlled revenue streams: Evaluate all City-controlled revenue streams for opportunities to grow non-tax revenues, including opportunities to introduce fees for services where no or limited cost is recovered from end users or beneficiaries. Administration has developed actions plans to address structural budget issues which include an examination of revenue opportunities within service areas. Initial work in this area includes CO02505 Ride Transit Program Funding Gap. Presented to Executive Committee on August 28, 2024 this report identified a funding gap for the ride transit program and included options to adjust revenue.

3. Assess capital requirements and determine the appropriate allocation for renewal and growth: With limited financial resources the City will need to assess the allocation of funding for growth and renewal, balancing the City’s need to address an expanding growing renewal deficit with growth as the City welcomes its next one million residents. The Capital Investment Outlook, completed in advance of each four year budget, is a 10-year look ahead meant to inform the capital budget. Administration presented the 2023-2032 Capital Investment Outlook to City Council on June 7, 2022. In response to a motion of Council, Administration will return in 2025 with a report that outlines the impact of increasing funding for renewal vs growth funding projects before commencing development of the 2027-2030 Capital budget.

4. Evaluate funding mechanisms to address the renewal deficit: Evaluate funding options to address the City’s growing renewal deficit, including the potential for a dedicated tax levy. On October 17, 2022 Administration presented IIS01330 Neighbourhood Renewal Funds and IIS01338 Options for a New Dedicated Tax Levy. The Neighbourhood Renewal Funds report provided an overview of the program as well as reduction scenarios and opportunities for renewal of other infrastructure assets. Options
to create a dedicated renewal fund mirroring the success of the Neighbourhood Renewal Program including a facilities renewal fund, Bridges and Auxiliary Structures renewal fund and a Transit Service renewal fund. Administration will return in the fall of 2024 with further updates.

5. Continued focus on divestiture and diligence in acquisition: Continue to explore divestiture opportunities for City capital assets. Maintaining the City’s asset base requires more financial resources than the City has revenue capacity to fulfill. Diligence in asset acquisition will be necessary to ensure growth does not add pressure to this asset base.

6. Comprehensive prioritization of capital growth and renewal: With an overall reduced capital funding envelope, the City needs a comprehensive prioritization of growth infrastructure and capital renewal, and a refocusing of capital spending within a narrower suite of projects. This work will be addressed in the 2027-2036 Capital Investment Outlook. Work will commence in late 2025 once work is complete on a potential renewal policy.

7. Service prioritization: With the fiscal constraints the City is experiencing, it needs to undergo comprehensive service prioritization, with a focus on traditional municipal services that are most necessary to maintain Edmontonians’ quality of life. Administration continues build on the work of previous budget reduction exercise and OP-12. Administration has advanced action plans to address structural budget variances and is current evaluating and prioritizing department and branch budgets as part of the fall supplementary operating budget adjustment process.

8. Advocacy and engagement: Continued advocacy and engagement efforts with higher orders government on modernized fiscal frameworks or funding arrangements that consider the responsibilities and pressures of big cities today.

9. Negotiate intergovernmental service delivery: Explore negotiated compensation agreements where the City delivers services for areas that are the responsibility of higher-order governments, where the City delivers services on their behalf, or where the City’s responsibilities have expanded into domains that are traditionally that of higher-order governments.

10. Prioritize strategic goals: The City’s strategic goals are expansive, pulling the City into non-traditional service areas which puts upward pressures on City expenditures beyond its revenue-raising capacity. The City does not have the financial means to advance all aspects of its strategic planning framework. It will need to focus resources on areas it has the most control over, and identify aspects that are higher priority.

11. Review policy requirements: Opportunity exists for a review of the City’s policies and bylaws that drive operating and capital requirements, to assess the financial impact against the outcomes achieved. Work has commenced on a number of policies including an assessment of the financial impact of capital policies. This work will return in the fall of 2024.
https://pub-edmonton.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=233989
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:32 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.