HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2821  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2024, 1:25 PM
Taeolas Taeolas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 4,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozabald View Post
Drove I-95 in Maine this week from the NB border to Bangor. Have to say what an excellent highway to drive. Very well maintained with very few bumps. Heading south, traffic very light until around Exit 227 for Lincoln. From that point southwards, traffic did noticeably pick up.

Looks like I-95 will not be extended to Fort Kent anytime soon.
https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024...nsion-for-now/
I'm not surprising. I-95 north of Bangor is already basically empty. Pushing further into Aroostock would be overkill. Especially since it's a stub. (unlike the case across the border, where the TCH is an artery connecting the Maritimes to the ROC). That the TCH exists and has a full freeway connection to I-95 also probably lessens the need to spur I-95 northward too.

Back when Loring was an active airbase and there was more activity in general in Aroostock, then the argument for an I-95 spur up that way would probably have made more sense.

Really, Aroostock would probably have been better off historically if it had gone to Canada way back then. Instead of being a literal forgotten corner of the States, it would have been an important corridor through Canada, and probably have seen more development in general. But that ship sailed centuries ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2822  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2024, 5:05 PM
KnoxfordGuy's Avatar
KnoxfordGuy KnoxfordGuy is offline
New Brunswick booster!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 1,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas View Post
Yeah 9-11 basically killed the cross border community in eastern NB. I grew up in Richmond Corner, and in the 80s/90s, going over to Houlton was as common as going into Town (Woodstock). Houlton's Walmart was basically built because of all the NB visitors, and a run down to Bangor was as common as a run down to Moncton or Halifax (if not more common).

After 9/11 and the border tightened up, those visits died off a lot (my parents still live there). Plus, the NB retail landscape improved significantly as retail chains started noticing the Maritimes. Walmart, Tims, McDs, KFC, Pizza Hut, etc... all came to Woodstock. Costco came to Fredericton, and Moncton just became a shopping hub in general. So with tighter border restrictions, a worsening exchange rate, better highway connections in NB and better shopping options in province, all led to the crossborder shopping habit basically drying up.
Off toppic but, I went to the mall in Bangor, ME for the first time since 2009 in 2023 and oh my goodness it was a dead zone! They said they relied a lot on NB shoppers and it dried up. I remember when that was the place to go for people from Grand-Falls to Nackawic! People would make a weekend out of it. There were busses chartered to take people down and go shopping back in the 90s and 00s. It was nuts to see.
__________________
Fredericton. Noble Daughter Of The Forest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2823  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2024, 5:12 PM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Hey srperrycgy - do you have any videos of the completed Calgary Ring Road ?
I haven't produced any videos in a while now. Thanks to our winters and the gravel spread on the roads, I need a new windshield before I start filming again and you know, life things.

xlbolt's video of the complete loop is pretty darn good.

Video Link
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2824  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2024, 7:23 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,987
The Stoney Trail has more 6 lanes mileage than all BC's roads and highways combined.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2825  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 7:37 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,893
Thanks for posting xlbolt’s video srperrycgy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2826  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 7:55 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,272
https://www.989xfm.ca/heatherton-are...f-highway-104/
The area in question is immediately east of the divided section around Antigonish, N.S. Local residents don’t agree with the province’s plan.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2827  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 6:39 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
A few have signed from this site (myself included) but not enough!

Let’s put pressure on the feds to start twinning the remaining 40km in Yoho Park, because after that there are still around 60KM to go in two more federal parks…
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2828  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2024, 7:16 PM
ned ned is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 19
Video showing before, during and after construction on Phase 4 of the Kicking Horse Highway Project. Quite interesting to see the different stages to gain insight on how they went about it. What an improvement.

https://youtu.be/v9JdCFZiSnQ?si=RQ8g115V14RkGrM1

Last edited by ned; Sep 22, 2024 at 7:28 PM. Reason: Embedded Video Was Not Working
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2829  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 12:09 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,893
^Great project - thanks for posting.
Here is another video:

http://https://youtu.be/JTiEMmfR6YI?si=hSmM2vhgA4sIW4Wp
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2830  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 3:56 AM
Carboy15 Carboy15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 302
It is great that the Kicking Horse section of Highway 1 is finally a four lane expressway. it is a very hard and expensive project to do in the Rocky Mountains.

What angers me now is that Doug Ford is proposing a tunnel to go under Highway 401 which would have an astronomical 60 Billion price tag. Besides adding more public transit, with that price I would rather have the government put that towards twinning Highway 17 from Sault Ste Marie to Arnprior. If they can twin the highway in the rockies with even more landform constraints, then this can be done too. Not on useless projects like tunnels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2831  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 6:55 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,043
Wow! 60 billion dollars for tunneling highway 401...

Instead, imaging investing 30 billion into HSR and 30 billion into the Trans Canada...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2832  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 7:33 AM
Carboy15 Carboy15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Wow! 60 billion dollars for tunneling highway 401...

Instead, imaging investing 30 billion into HSR and 30 billion into the Trans Canada...
Yep, that's right. It probably won't solve traffic problems either.

Not to mention, Southern Ontario has lots of roads already, but public transit is lacking. And Northern Ontario needs a Highway more than Southern Ontario does. They have lots of roads (and building more) where they don't need them, and less where they do need them. Unfortunately, some may argue that it is the opposite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2833  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 3:07 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,868
A lot of misconstrusion about the 401 tunnel. It is highly unlikely to be a $60 billion project.

The press release detailed the following:

Quote:
Engineering services will be secured through the Ministry of Transportation, with support from Infrastructure Ontario. The feasibility work will include the following:

Examining various options to increase Highway 401 capacity, including potential routes within the existing right-of-way, number of lanes, length, and the number and design of interchanges connecting to other highways;
Refining the province’s understanding of the proposed tunnel’s economic contributions, both in the short- and long-term, as well as the project’s impact on reducing gridlock;
Reviewing best practices from similar projects in other jurisdictions;
Conducting initial soil boring testing to improve the province’s understanding of the route’s geology and its impact on design and construction;
Preparing to start the environmental assessment processes for the project; and
Conducting an initial market sounding, with feedback informing any potential procurement and commercial structuring strategies.
So a study of the 55km corridor of the 401 through Central Toronto from roughly the 407 eastwards to Pickering. Notably, the westernmost 10km of this corridor was literally just widened from 6 to 12 lanes. It doesn't need a tunnel. The study is looking at how to improve capacity across the corridor, including a potential tunnel for at least part of it. Much of the corridor may end up being widened without a tunnel at all, including the central portions.

It does not mean a 55-kilometre tunnel. I would be surprised if the tunnel ends up being half that length. And as such, will likely not cost anywhere close to $60 billion.

Also - if you drive on the 401, you know how congested it is. A $30 billion 401 tunnel through central Toronto would likely boost GDP by more than $30 billion spent on the Trans-Canada would, by a significant margin.

Ultimately we know basically 0 details about the project and even it's basic scope. The media is having a field day with a couple of sentences in a press release. Let's wait and hear some more details before passing judgement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2834  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 4:11 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 20,092
How much would it cost to make the 407 free?
__________________
Can I help you?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2835  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 4:57 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
How much would it cost to make the 407 free?
The last recorded sale of 407 shares was in 2019 and gave the company a $30 billion valuation. And that was 5 years ago, so much more now.

Also - contrary to popular belief, the 407 is very, very close to capacity in rush hours and traffic projections have it running pretty significantly over capacities in the timeframe the tunnel would happen. Even today during peak summer months the highway can experience minor amounts of peak-hour volume congestion on central parts of it.

Buying it back would be throwing $30 billion down a hole with 0 new infrastructure created and very little to no peak-hour additional capacity added to the network.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2836  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 7:01 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,277
Putting aside this crazy "proposal" for a second, there is definitely a need for more east-west road capacity in the GTA, but a tunnel under an existing highway that just happens to be one of the busiest in the world is not the way to do it.

I think the low hanging fruit should be:

- redesign certain interchanges and do selective widenings that are clear bottlenecks. I can think of a few: the 400 to the 401, which only empties onto the collector lanes, is a major chokepoint. The infamous section between the 427 and the 409 that has no express/collector lanes could stand to be bypassed with an elevated viaduct.

- there's provincially-owned land beside the 407 that's intended for a transitway, right? Consider building a 4 lane transitway and allow trucks.

- with the rise in EVs, consider building an underground, EV car only toll tunnel that's maybe 3 lanes wide (1 lane in each direction + 1 counterflow lane). EVs don't require ventilation ($$$) and if it's for personal cars only, you can drop the clearance substantially, which means you don't have to dig out as much dirt. Enforce it by taking a picture of the license plate. Any car that doesn't start with "GV" gets slapped with a $1,000 fine, mailed to your house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2837  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 10:50 PM
theman23's Avatar
theman23 theman23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ville de Québec
Posts: 5,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post

- with the rise in EVs, consider building an underground, EV car only toll tunnel that's maybe 3 lanes wide (1 lane in each direction + 1 counterflow lane). EVs don't require ventilation ($$$) and if it's for personal cars only, you can drop the clearance substantially, which means you don't have to dig out as much dirt. Enforce it by taking a picture of the license plate. Any car that doesn't start with "GV" gets slapped with a $1,000 fine, mailed to your house.
Will probably be full of Infiniti G35s with peeling and tinted license plates. Sorta kidding.
__________________
For entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice.

Last edited by theman23; Sep 30, 2024 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2838  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 11:34 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 20,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
Enforce it by taking a picture of the license plate. Any car that doesn't start with "GV" gets slapped with a $1,000 fine, mailed to your house.
Nah. Spike strips for non EV vehicles.

Why not?
__________________
Can I help you?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2839  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 1:17 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,868
the problem with an "EV Only" tunnel is that physics doesn't support fines. It needs to be physically impossible for gas-powered vehicles to enter the tunnel to work or you need to design the project to accommodate scoff-laws. You also need access for emergency and service vehicles which sort of defeats any size savings.


Good ideas presented, and if you read the press release, that is basically what the study is doing. It will examine potential capacity expansions on the corridor with the tunnel being the "last resort" solution. It very well could end up recommending some of the things you identified, and seems to hint at interchange improvements at the 400/401 and 404/401, which I know have been on MTO's radar for a while.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2840  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 10:16 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
A lot of misconstrusion about the 401 tunnel. It is highly unlikely to be a $60 billion project.

The press release detailed the following:



So a study of the 55km corridor of the 401 through Central Toronto from roughly the 407 eastwards to Pickering. Notably, the westernmost 10km of this corridor was literally just widened from 6 to 12 lanes. It doesn't need a tunnel. The study is looking at how to improve capacity across the corridor, including a potential tunnel for at least part of it. Much of the corridor may end up being widened without a tunnel at all, including the central portions.

It does not mean a 55-kilometre tunnel. I would be surprised if the tunnel ends up being half that length. And as such, will likely not cost anywhere close to $60 billion.

Also - if you drive on the 401, you know how congested it is. A $30 billion 401 tunnel through central Toronto would likely boost GDP by more than $30 billion spent on the Trans-Canada would, by a significant margin.

Ultimately we know basically 0 details about the project and even it's basic scope. The media is having a field day with a couple of sentences in a press release. Let's wait and hear some more details before passing judgement.
Interesting, that's very different from what the media has portrayed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.