HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1021  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2024, 7:07 PM
lirette lirette is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 765
On Bernard Lord, I believe he lives in Shediac, still commutes into the office from time to time at Medavie.

I really can't see him being interested in the current iteration of the Higgs PC Party. In theory he aligns closer to Holts vision of the province. Not perfectly but it you put it on a scale she is more of a moderate liberal. Like MonctonRad said he would make far more sense running for MP. I can't see him giving up a CEO job to be MLA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1022  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2024, 12:14 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by lirette View Post
On Bernard Lord, I believe he lives in Shediac, still commutes into the office from time to time at Medavie.

I really can't see him being interested in the current iteration of the Higgs PC Party. In theory he aligns closer to Holts vision of the province. Not perfectly but it you put it on a scale she is more of a moderate liberal. Like MonctonRad said he would make far more sense running for MP. I can't see him giving up a CEO job to be MLA.
I don't think anyone was suggesting former NB Premier Bernard Lord was going to come back to NB to run as an MLA for the Higgs PC's

They were talking about him parachuting into the new, Saint John-Kennebecasis federal riding, which would be very weird...

Seems this Melissa Young lady is the likely parachute candidate, but who knows for sure.

Myself personally, I'd rather have a parachute candidate from Toronto than some rich doctor from Rothesay who is probably personally opposed to regional amalgamation or any other solutions that might get at the root causes disparity and inequality between the City of Saint John and its bedroom communities.

The West Side of Saint John, unfortunately, is almost certainly going to be stuck with John Williamson, who seems like a giant dolt, monarchist, and far right bible thumper. Although, I'm willing to reserve judgement as to the type of job he'll do as our MP. Who knows, maybe he'll actually move his office to Saint John, and take a keen interest in the riding. The West Side could certainly learn a lot from Saint Andrews in terms of playing up the "seaside" nature of our community.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1023  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2024, 2:49 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
I wouldn't call it a moderate wing, but the pc party is trying to adjudicate the last leadership race. Kelly Van Buskirk being a lawyer for John Dornan for example: KVB was member of Norton's run for the PC leadership and a key member of the PC leadership locally.

Many of the PC leadership have been frozen out, or never have been a part of of Higgs' circle. Much of the strife within the PC party reflects this.

That said, its still Higgs to lose. Mind you, the candidate for Portland Simonds has already been to my house on a door knocking expedition; Dornan's too busy beekeeping to bother, I suspect.
Do I detect a little partisan bias in that last comment?

Actually Dornan's been to my door and to several people I know. I've been told he has been canvassing 2-3 evenings a week since shortly after he officially became the candidate.

I haven't seen the PC candidate yet but he was at a friend's house one street over a couple of days ago so I know he's out there too and expect I'll see him sometime soon.

In terms of the local candidate's ground game the campaign seems like it is well underway and has been for awhile.

Last edited by sailor734; Aug 18, 2024 at 4:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1024  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2024, 3:49 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
… probably personally opposed to regional amalgamation or any other solutions that might get at the root causes disparity and inequality between the City of Saint John and its bedroom communities. …
Do we actually understand the root cause of the discontinuity between SJ and the suburbs?

While amalgamation is interesting; I could argue that SJ with specific application of some of the Rothesay policies regarding nuisances and detrimental social behaviours could surpass the bedroom communities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1025  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2024, 4:19 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
Do we actually understand the root cause of the discontinuity between SJ and the suburbs?

While amalgamation is interesting; I could argue that SJ with specific application of some of the Rothesay policies regarding nuisances and detrimental social behaviours could surpass the bedroom communities.
I've always thought any inequality between SJ and the KV bedroom communities was largely do to 1. The weather and 2. a long line of inept municipal governments in Saint John.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1026  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2024, 3:27 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post


Do I detect a little partisan bias in that last comment?
Nah, just my annoyance at the cbc fluff piece they did a while ago.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-b...ital-1.6619974
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1027  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2024, 5:23 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,081
Fair enough. While I actually found that particular piece interesting I certainly agree that many CBC human interest(AKA Fluff) pieces are more than a little annoying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1028  
Old Posted Yesterday, 11:30 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 405
Arrow Regional Disparity in The Saint John Region: A Kennebecasis Riverboat Fantasy

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
Do we actually understand the root cause of the discontinuity between SJ and the suburbs?

While amalgamation is interesting; I could argue that SJ with specific application of some of the Rothesay policies regarding nuisances and detrimental social behaviours could surpass the bedroom communities.


Discontinuity and disparity are two totally different things. I was talking about the disparity between the Saint John and it's bedroom communities, not the discontinuity, as you're absolutely right, a big reason for the discontinuity in terms of social issues, nuisances, and cleaner neighbourhoods has to do with governance. However, don't discount how much of Saint John's issues are caused regional disparity and economic inequality between the city and surrounding communities. Moreover, the continued demographic flight of Saint Johners to the surrounding communities, especially Quispamsis, Rothesay and Grand Bay since the 1990's left the City of Saint John underfunded and financially unstable.




Around 50% of the Saint John CMA now lives to the north of this line city limits, but the region very much remains a cohesive entity. Around 75% of the highest paid people working in Saint John live to the north of this line. Also, many of the top positions relating to the governance, economic leadership, and social development of the City of Saint John are held by people who live outside the city limits, and they don't want their Kennebecasis riverboat fantasy to end.

It's not just Envision Saint John that is mainly run by people who live outside the city, it's the City of Saint John bureaucracy too, and people in the provincial government who make decisions relating to Saint John, the most obvious of of which is Premier Higgs himself, a resident of Quispamsis. Someone who made millions working in Saint John, but living in Quispamsis... who went as far to write a letter to the province opposing amalgamation with the City of Saint John, when he just a lowly finance minister. He's always been opposed to KV paying their fair share to the region as a whole, as are many rich, powerful, and influential people who live in KV... some of whom still consider themselves Saint Johners.

What Sailor said is also true. While, I personally think the stuff about the fog is mostly overblown bullshit, but I don't not believe that people believe in that bullshit either, because they clearly do. People also love to justify their rationale for their decision to move outside the city limits. Unfortunately, these justifications have morphed into something incredibly pervasive and negative, where many people in the Saint John Region and other New Brunswickers engage in stereotyping The City of Saint John as an overtaxed, foggy, smelly, dismally bleak city that no one would ever want to live in.

Stereotypes are usually based on some sort of truth, but the one part of the truth many don't want to admit the success of KV has mostly been at the expense of KV. There's a whole lot of social and economic externalities that have been foisted upon Saint John by such a large % of the tax base deciding to move 20 minutes down the highway to pay slightly less taxes in less foggy communities.

The other thing Sailor mentioned was poor municipal governance and he's absolutely right about that too! However, a big part of why the municipal governance has gotten so bad, especially relating to the city council and mayors office, is because so many of the highly educated, highly experienced residents of Saint John moved to the bedroom communities... you have to live in Saint John to be on council, or run for mayor, so it's no surprise that Saint John's common council's and mayors office has gotten progressively worse over the years, as more and more of the most highly educated and experience people in the Saint John region could no longer run for mayor or city council.

I'd say there's a pretty direct correlation between the demographic rise of Saint John's outlying communities, and the deteriorating levels of good municipal governance in Saint John. So talk about a reason FOR amalgamation, not only would it give the urban core of the CMA a boost to funding, it would enable a far wider group of people to run for council or mayor.

Saint John went through an initial demographic implosion during the 1970s, but also a second demographic flight to the suburb which is more to blame for the current divide between Saint John and the bedroom communities today. The Government of NB has been well aware of the huge flight to Saint John's suburbs for decades, it's been a problem since the 1970s, but both parties have essentially done nothing to get at the root of the economic, social, and political disparities between The City of Saint John and its suburbs. The Liberals and PC's in the past have used amalgamation, and also, opposition to amalgamation to woo voters both inside and outside the city to win seats in the provincial legislature. While more recently, all major parties have avoided avoided amalgamation like the plague, at least in terms of it being an election issue. Municipal amalgamations remains the purview of the provincial government, and in the case of Saint John, the lack of regional amalgamation is not not just holding the city back, but the entire region... people are getting their nice, cushy lives in suburbia, but the region overall is absolutely being held by the lack of action on amalgamation or serious solutions to get to the root of the economic, social, and political inequality which is holding back our growth potential. Saint John: Small City, Big Brain Drain.

There'd be no gripe about this geographic and demographic reality if the bedroom of communities amalgamated with Saint John, and formed a new regional municipality, like countless other cities in Canada... there would, of course, still be continued economic, social, and political disparity between the city and suburbs, but at least the entire CMA would be set up for a more sustainable and equitable future... it would take a blatantly unfair demographic situation and make it at least more fair.

Susan Holt's Liberals seemingly want nothing to do with the issue of amalgamation at the moment, but would she and her party really have anything to lose? The Liberals don't really have a chance in hell to win Rothesay, Quispamsis, or Grand Bay seats as is. The Liberals coming out in favour of amalgamation for The Saint John Region from Grand Bay to Quispamsis would greatly increase their chances of winning seats in Saint John, without risking John Herron's chances to beat Faytene for the Hampton seat.

Amalgamation done right would look something like this:

#1) A new name for the newly created Regional Municipality

#2) A strategy to give autonomy to communities within the RM

#3) Savings, Profits, and increased levels of economic growth and development


Saint John would still exist at the centre of this region, but it would have less power and less influence, as the real power would reside in the Regional Municipality. There's a lot in a name, and I'm sorry to say, but Saint John has a bad reputation. Moreover, the "Saint John" name causes a distinct branding and marketing challenge, because of its extreme similarity with St. John's, NL the slightly bigger, substantially more notable city within the same region of Atlantic Canada. Keep the Port Saint John name, but rename the airport. Keep Uptown Saint John, but bring back Lancaster. There's so many big opportunities for improvement with amalgamation and a new name for said entity, we just need political leaders in this province with the vision and foresight to see the benefit, and the courage to actually get it done.

I think Susan Holt's Liberals have a unique opportunity to win an extra seat or two in Saint John, by supporting what might be the ultimate anti Higgs policy position: regional amalgamation in the Saint John region. The notion that promising regional amalgamation for the Saint John region, would lose the Liberals any seats in the suburbs of Moncton and Fredericton, is asinine, as the Liberals could make it clear that amalgamation would only apply to Saint John (which was left out of the round of regional amalgamations conducted by the Higgs government in 2021).

If anything, successful regional amalgamation in Saint John, would get the suburbs of Moncton and even Fredericton calling for it too due to FOMO. I know New Brunswick is resistant to change, but if we really want to take advantage of the recent demographic growth trend, we need to embrace the notion that bigger is better... and regional Amalgamation in the Saint John Region is the logical place to start. We need to wake up and smell the seaweed... most immigrants don't want to move to small cities. We'll be able to attract more immigrants, and better immigrants by amalgamating and inflating the population totals these people find when looking up where they want to immigrate to in Canada. A population of 150,000 looks and sounds a lot better than 80,000, not just for immigrants from other countries, but also for internal immigration.

The question is, is regional amalgamation really not happening because it's a bad idea? Or is it not happening because Rothesay, Quispamsis, and others suburbs of Saint John wield power and influence far disproportionate to their populations? I think it's pretty clearly the latter, and very much a case of not seeing the forest through the trees. Until amalgamation is realized it should be an election issue every election. It baffles me why more Saint Johners don't seem to try and make it a bigger election issue... I guess many have simply given up on it, but they really shouldn't. I remain hopeful it will happen in my lifetime, and remain convinced it would be an overwhelmingly positive change for the entire region.

Sorry for the rant, I'm not trying to argue with you, just trying to explain my take on the regional situation as someone who moved to Saint John and really got my eyes open regarding the dynamics between the city proper and its outlying suburbs. It's like the freaking Sringfield vs Shelbyville dynamic on the Simpsons... or a microcosm of Detroit and it's suburbs. I love Saint John, and think the surrounding region is great too, but I really feel like the dynamic and division between SJ and KV is one of the worst aspects of living here. Also, I think the negative aspects of this divide are far more apparent to outsiders that have moved here, than to people who were born and raised here and just consider it normal. Imo, this situation is not normal, and it is what truly stinks here in the Saint John Region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1029  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:32 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Discontinuity and disparity are two totally different things. I was talking about the disparity between the Saint John and it's bedroom communities, not the discontinuity, as you're absolutely right, a big reason for the discontinuity in terms of social issues, nuisances, and cleaner neighbourhoods has to do with governance. However, don't discount how much of Saint John's issues are caused regional disparity and economic inequality between the city and surrounding communities. Moreover, the continued demographic flight of Saint Johners to the surrounding communities, especially Quispamsis, Rothesay and Grand Bay since the 1990's left the City of Saint John underfunded and financially unstable.




Around 50% of the Saint John CMA now lives to the north of this line city limits, but the region very much remains a cohesive entity. Around 75% of the highest paid people working in Saint John live to the north of this line. Also, many of the top positions relating to the governance, economic leadership, and social development of the City of Saint John are held by people who live outside the city limits, and they don't want their Kennebecasis riverboat fantasy to end.

It's not just Envision Saint John that is mainly run by people who live outside the city, it's the City of Saint John bureaucracy too, and people in the provincial government who make decisions relating to Saint John, the most obvious of of which is Premier Higgs himself, a resident of Quispamsis. Someone who made millions working in Saint John, but living in Quispamsis... who went as far to write a letter to the province opposing amalgamation with the City of Saint John, when he just a lowly finance minister. He's always been opposed to KV paying their fair share to the region as a whole, as are many rich, powerful, and influential people who live in KV... some of whom still consider themselves Saint Johners.

What Sailor said is also true. While, I personally think the stuff about the fog is mostly overblown bullshit, but I don't not believe that people believe in that bullshit either, because they clearly do. People also love to justify their rationale for their decision to move outside the city limits. Unfortunately, these justifications have morphed into something incredibly pervasive and negative, where many people in the Saint John Region and other New Brunswickers engage in stereotyping The City of Saint John as an overtaxed, foggy, smelly, dismally bleak city that no one would ever want to live in.

Stereotypes are usually based on some sort of truth, but the one part of the truth many don't want to admit the success of KV has mostly been at the expense of KV. There's a whole lot of social and economic externalities that have been foisted upon Saint John by such a large % of the tax base deciding to move 20 minutes down the highway to pay slightly less taxes in less foggy communities.

The other thing Sailor mentioned was poor municipal governance and he's absolutely right about that too! However, a big part of why the municipal governance has gotten so bad, especially relating to the city council and mayors office, is because so many of the highly educated, highly experienced residents of Saint John moved to the bedroom communities... you have to live in Saint John to be on council, or run for mayor, so it's no surprise that Saint John's common council's and mayors office has gotten progressively worse over the years, as more and more of the most highly educated and experience people in the Saint John region could no longer run for mayor or city council.

I'd say there's a pretty direct correlation between the demographic rise of Saint John's outlying communities, and the deteriorating levels of good municipal governance in Saint John. So talk about a reason FOR amalgamation, not only would it give the urban core of the CMA a boost to funding, it would enable a far wider group of people to run for council or mayor.

Saint John went through an initial demographic implosion during the 1970s, but also a second demographic flight to the suburb which is more to blame for the current divide between Saint John and the bedroom communities today. The Government of NB has been well aware of the huge flight to Saint John's suburbs for decades, it's been a problem since the 1970s, but both parties have essentially done nothing to get at the root of the economic, social, and political disparities between The City of Saint John and its suburbs. The Liberals and PC's in the past have used amalgamation, and also, opposition to amalgamation to woo voters both inside and outside the city to win seats in the provincial legislature. While more recently, all major parties have avoided avoided amalgamation like the plague, at least in terms of it being an election issue. Municipal amalgamations remains the purview of the provincial government, and in the case of Saint John, the lack of regional amalgamation is not not just holding the city back, but the entire region... people are getting their nice, cushy lives in suburbia, but the region overall is absolutely being held by the lack of action on amalgamation or serious solutions to get to the root of the economic, social, and political inequality which is holding back our growth potential. Saint John: Small City, Big Brain Drain.

There'd be no gripe about this geographic and demographic reality if the bedroom of communities amalgamated with Saint John, and formed a new regional municipality, like countless other cities in Canada... there would, of course, still be continued economic, social, and political disparity between the city and suburbs, but at least the entire CMA would be set up for a more sustainable and equitable future... it would take a blatantly unfair demographic situation and make it at least more fair.

Susan Holt's Liberals seemingly want nothing to do with the issue of amalgamation at the moment, but would she and her party really have anything to lose? The Liberals don't really have a chance in hell to win Rothesay, Quispamsis, or Grand Bay seats as is. The Liberals coming out in favour of amalgamation for The Saint John Region from Grand Bay to Quispamsis would greatly increase their chances of winning seats in Saint John, without risking John Herron's chances to beat Faytene for the Hampton seat.

Amalgamation done right would look something like this:

#1) A new name for the newly created Regional Municipality

#2) A strategy to give autonomy to communities within the RM

#3) Savings, Profits, and increased levels of economic growth and development


Saint John would still exist at the centre of this region, but it would have less power and less influence, as the real power would reside in the Regional Municipality. There's a lot in a name, and I'm sorry to say, but Saint John has a bad reputation. Moreover, the "Saint John" name causes a distinct branding and marketing challenge, because of its extreme similarity with St. John's, NL the slightly bigger, substantially more notable city within the same region of Atlantic Canada. Keep the Port Saint John name, but rename the airport. Keep Uptown Saint John, but bring back Lancaster. There's so many big opportunities for improvement with amalgamation and a new name for said entity, we just need political leaders in this province with the vision and foresight to see the benefit, and the courage to actually get it done.

I think Susan Holt's Liberals have a unique opportunity to win an extra seat or two in Saint John, by supporting what might be the ultimate anti Higgs policy position: regional amalgamation in the Saint John region. The notion that promising regional amalgamation for the Saint John region, would lose the Liberals any seats in the suburbs of Moncton and Fredericton, is asinine, as the Liberals could make it clear that amalgamation would only apply to Saint John (which was left out of the round of regional amalgamations conducted by the Higgs government in 2021).

If anything, successful regional amalgamation in Saint John, would get the suburbs of Moncton and even Fredericton calling for it too due to FOMO. I know New Brunswick is resistant to change, but if we really want to take advantage of the recent demographic growth trend, we need to embrace the notion that bigger is better... and regional Amalgamation in the Saint John Region is the logical place to start. We need to wake up and smell the seaweed... most immigrants don't want to move to small cities. We'll be able to attract more immigrants, and better immigrants by amalgamating and inflating the population totals these people find when looking up where they want to immigrate to in Canada. A population of 150,000 looks and sounds a lot better than 80,000, not just for immigrants from other countries, but also for internal immigration.

The question is, is regional amalgamation really not happening because it's a bad idea? Or is it not happening because Rothesay, Quispamsis, and others suburbs of Saint John wield power and influence far disproportionate to their populations? I think it's pretty clearly the latter, and very much a case of not seeing the forest through the trees. Until amalgamation is realized it should be an election issue every election. It baffles me why more Saint Johners don't seem to try and make it a bigger election issue... I guess many have simply given up on it, but they really shouldn't. I remain hopeful it will happen in my lifetime, and remain convinced it would be an overwhelmingly positive change for the entire region.

Sorry for the rant, I'm not trying to argue with you, just trying to explain my take on the regional situation as someone who moved to Saint John and really got my eyes open regarding the dynamics between the city proper and its outlying suburbs. It's like the freaking Sringfield vs Shelbyville dynamic on the Simpsons... or a microcosm of Detroit and it's suburbs. I love Saint John, and think the surrounding region is great too, but I really feel like the dynamic and division between SJ and KV is one of the worst aspects of living here. Also, I think the negative aspects of this divide are far more apparent to outsiders that have moved here, than to people who were born and raised here and just consider it normal. Imo, this situation is not normal, and it is what truly stinks here in the Saint John Region.
How is this different than other doughnut cities?

https://www.atributosurbanos.es/en/t...al%20periphery.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1030  
Old Posted Today, 2:19 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
How is this different than other doughnut cities?

https://www.atributosurbanos.es/en/t...al%20periphery.
I’d have to do more reading about donut cities to answer that, but I do think the situation of Saint John is quite unique in the Canadian context. The SJ vs KV dynamic is very similar to that of Springfield vs Shelbyville dynamic, and that’s lame. I feel that not only Saint John, but the entire region is being held back by the division and lack of cooperation between the communities of Greater Saint John. The quickest, most logical way to get at the root of the problem remains regional amalgamation, but I’m willing to listen to alternative solutions. Either way, something has to change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1031  
Old Posted Today, 10:54 AM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
I’d have to do more reading about donut cities to answer that, but I do think the situation of Saint John is quite unique in the Canadian context. The SJ vs KV dynamic is very similar to that of Springfield vs Shelbyville dynamic, and that’s lame. I feel that not only Saint John, but the entire region is being held back by the division and lack of cooperation between the communities of Greater Saint John. The quickest, most logical way to get at the root of the problem remains regional amalgamation, but I’m willing to listen to alternative solutions. Either way, something has to change.
Fair enough. Much of the discussion on this facet of urban non-planning comes from the US. A recent financial post article (https://archive.ph/iv3kJ) discusses the same for Edmonton.

A relevant quote:

And crime is rampant in many urban centres, as last week’s visit to Edmonton reminded me. If people feel unsafe downtown, only very generous subsidies will persuade them to live there.

So far, I have not heard many municipal politicians concede their cities are turning into doughnuts. But if that is happening, they’re going to need a new approach to municipal priorities. Wishful thinking about the good old days of an urban core living off a commercial property gold mine won’t pay the bills.

SJ is just further along the process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1032  
Old Posted Today, 11:08 AM
sjuser23 sjuser23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Regional thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
Fair enough. Much of the discussion on this facet of urban non-planning comes from the US. A recent financial post article (https://archive.ph/iv3kJ) discusses the same for Edmonton.

A relevant quote:

And crime is rampant in many urban centres, as last week’s visit to Edmonton reminded me. If people feel unsafe downtown, only very generous subsidies will persuade them to live there.

So far, I have not heard many municipal politicians concede their cities are turning into doughnuts. But if that is happening, they’re going to need a new approach to municipal priorities. Wishful thinking about the good old days of an urban core living off a commercial property gold mine won’t pay the bills.

SJ is just further along the process.
One of the major differences between NB and other jurisdictions that has caused the disparity between the City centre and the outlying communities is the taxation policies.

Most urban centers benefit from the full property tax lift of commercial and industrial property tax and many benefit from a portion of payroll or sales tax. Imagine the level of services and the investments that could be made in SJ if the City received similar benefits to other urban centers across the world.

In NB, the best return for municipal finances is to focus on residential. It provides the highest ROI given the lower cost to support and the municipality keeps 100% of the revenue. The employment benefits, sales tax, a portion of property tax and other benefits all flow to the Province while cities carry the burden. Everywhere else, the best amenities and higher cost of real estate in is the City center, not the suburbs but it's the reverse here.

Blaming municipal governments or politicians is a cheap and easy way to find a scapegoat. Do you really think that every other municipality has no issue with politicians or municipal governance and that everyone else is high performing except little 'ol Saint John? You don't think that scandals, mis-management, union issues, poor investment decisions occur elsewhere and it's a uniquely SJ issue?

If you examine it, what truly sets NB apart is taxation policy.

Why was SJ the most prosperous part of NB until the 70's? What changed in the 60's that caused a change in direction?

You could also argue that our love of roads and fast commuting enabled suburban growth as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1033  
Old Posted Today, 11:17 AM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjuser23 View Post
One of the major differences between NB and other jurisdictions that has caused the disparity between the City centre and the outlying communities is the taxation policies.

Most urban centers benefit from the full property tax lift of commercial and industrial property tax and many benefit from a portion of payroll or sales tax. Imagine the level of services and the investments that could be made in SJ if the City received similar benefits to other urban centers across the world.

In NB, the best return for municipal finances is to focus on residential. It provides the highest ROI given the lower cost to support and the municipality keeps 100% of the revenue. The employment benefits, sales tax, a portion of property tax and other benefits all flow to the Province while cities carry the burden. Everywhere else, the best amenities and higher cost of real estate in is the City center, not the suburbs but it's the reverse here.

Blaming municipal governments or politicians is a cheap and easy way to find a scapegoat. Do you really think that every other municipality has no issue with politicians or municipal governance and that everyone else is high performing except little 'ol Saint John? You don't think that scandals, mis-management, union issues, poor investment decisions occur elsewhere and it's a uniquely SJ issue?

If you examine it, what truly sets NB apart is taxation policy.

Why was SJ the most prosperous part of NB until the 70's? What changed in the 60's that caused a change in direction?

You could also argue that our love of roads and fast commuting enabled suburban growth as well.
Couldn't you argue the reverse. Taxation policy isn't homogeneous across the multiple examples of donut cities across North America, but the effect still occurs?

One could argue that taxation policy has minor effect at best?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1034  
Old Posted Today, 1:14 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,081
I was coming back to SJ from Rothesay around 9:30 this morning driving on the old Rothesay road through what used to be East Riverside. I immediately thought of this thread when I noticed I was in a string of 4 SUV's heading to town. Lexus, BMW, Mercedes and a Porsche.....how's that for an example of disparity?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1035  
Old Posted Today, 1:17 PM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
I was coming back to SJ from Rothesay around 9:30 this morning driving on the old Rothesay road through what used to be East Riverside. I immediately thought of this thread when I noticed I was in a string of 4 SUV's heading to town. Lexus, BMW, Mercedes and a Porsche.....how's that for an example of disparity?
To be fair, any quick tour through Millidgeville will reveal the same selection of car makes in a lot of driveways.

But yes, KV's income disparity to the city is pronounced to say the least. As pointed out by others, that kind of disparity between an urban core and the suburbs is definitely not unique to Saint John.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1036  
Old Posted Today, 1:29 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour View Post
To be fair, any quick tour through Millidgeville will reveal the same selection of car makes in a lot of driveways.

But yes, KV's income disparity to the city is pronounced to say the least. As pointed out by others, that kind of disparity between an urban core and the suburbs is definitely not unique to Saint John.


Lots of people I know in Millidgeville would be in favour of amalgamation............As long as it involved seccession from Saint John and amalgamation with Rothesay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.