HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:12 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Yes, lets chase a diversity of businesses from Gastown so it becomes a bar zone. Because that's worked out so well for the stabby Granville Street Vomitarium.
Add more businesses to Gastown? That's a wonderful idea; the run-down part of Granville's like that because half the units are empty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:20 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Yes, lets chase a diversity of businesses from Gastown so it becomes a bar zone. Because that's worked out so well for the stabby Granville Street Vomitarium.
I've never understood this talking point. Granville north of Robson is all car free (with busses + taxis mind you), and has a diversity of businesses (hell, there's a SleepCountry) and no bars. In fact, I'd much rather be north of Robson than south of Smithe at any time of day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:46 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
It was ABC's idea. All the City's webpages related to the project start 'As directed by Council. The motion was submitted by councillor Kirby-Yung, and includes looking at making Water Street car-free or car-light on a seasonal or year-round basis. So this is just the initial test of what could happen.

If you are opposed to a two month trial of a short section being restricted to vehicles, you seem to be suggesting that Water Street should have remained a traffic sewer, with no attempt to change it?
No, they should have committed to a trial that also included months where locals would be the driving force in business activity though. I also expect ABC to admit if it has been harmful to businesses and act accordingly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:52 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,433
If the City has a lax attitude about drug use, loitering by undesirables, and general street lawlessness, especially at areas with a huge concentration of supportive housing and associated services, pedestrians who benefit the businesses of the area most will likely avoid them. In many cities around the world, there are beat cops patrolling the streets, or even "tourist" police available for visitors and business owners to feel safe even during late hour visits. There is well-timed and constant street cleaning throughout the day to prevent garbage or pissy-street smell building up. Those who break the law should be fined or even jailed. ABC need to improve in all these areas before we can have successful full-pedestrian streets, particularly at more challenging locations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:55 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
If the City has a lax attitude about drug use, loitering by undesirables, and general street lawlessness, especially at areas with a huge concentration of supportive housing and associated services, pedestrians who benefit the businesses of the area most will likely avoid them. In many cities around the world, there are beat cops patrolling the streets, or even "tourist" police available for visitors and business owners to feel safe even during late hour visits. There is well-timed and constant street cleaning throughout the day to prevent garbage or pissy-street smell building up. ABC needs to improve in all these areas before we can have successful full-pedestrian streets, particularly at more challenging locations.
Don't you have your own containment thread for this drivel?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 8:12 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
If the City has a lax attitude about drug use, loitering by undesirables, and general street lawlessness, especially at areas with a huge concentration of supportive housing and associated services, pedestrians who benefit the businesses of the area most will likely avoid them. In many cities around the world, there are beat cops patrolling the streets, or even "tourist" police available for visitors and business owners to feel safe even during late hour visits. There is well-timed and constant street cleaning throughout the day to prevent garbage or pissy-street smell building up. Those who break the law should be fined or even jailed. ABC need to improve in all these areas before we can have successful full-pedestrian streets, particularly at more challenging locations.
One could argue with more space to walk there is more room to avoid bad characters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 5:17 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,040
Changes coming to Park Place? Submitted by MCM.

Quote:
I would like to apply for City Building Grades for 666 Burrard Street. Office name is Park Plaza. Site specific along Burrard and fronting the urban plaza to Dunsmuir and Hornby street. Lane is not being touched.
https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=234683766
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 7:09 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Changes coming to Park Place? Submitted by MCM.


https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=234683766
Same person is connected to this permit July 18

Quote:
Work Description: Interior alterations to reduce the unit size of this existing Retail Limited Food Service and add a service room on the B1 Concourse level at this commercial building on this site.
https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=236823233
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 7:32 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,040
Nothing of interest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 10:48 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,659
Quote:
Prima recently announced its latest plans to launch Monogram. It's a 49-storey, mixed-use high-rise located at the corner of Burrard and Davie streets.

Permitted under the City of Vancouver’s higher building policy, the tower will have 260 strata condos ranging from one bedroom to three bedrooms, plus 50 rental units. It will also include a mix of commercial units as well as a 49th-floor, 1,860-square-foot rooftop lounge for residents.

"We feel it's a good time for local buyers to get back into the downtown market," David Buddle, vice president of Prima Properties, said in an interview with RENX.
Quote:
The building will feature a city-operated daycare with outdoor play areas, four retail spaces, office space, a ground-level cafe/bistro and a public art plaza as part of its community amenity contribution package.

Monogram will also serve as the hub for a community arts and culture centre managed by the City of Vancouver that will provide space for non-profit arts and culture organizations.

The southwest exterior features a series of automatic solar shades that will display a pixelated mosaic.

“The shades will drop automatically as the sun hits them, to stop solar gain within the suite, but also create a visual animation outside,” Buddle said. From the exterior, the shades will depict the North Shore Mountains. Residents can manually open their unit’s shades if they desire.
Quote:
Last month, Monogram was reported by real estate media to be among four downtown condo projects with stalled rezoning processes, with the developers requesting to extend the final (and conditional) rezoning window with the city.

When asked to clarify the decision to move forward now with the project, Prima's team said the initial rezoning for Monogram occurred during COVID, and the city processing times were longer. It took time to work through the legal agreements for the on-site day care, the cultural hub offices and public corner plaza.

Buddle confirmed to RENX his team is ready to go before council this fall to proceed with enacting the rezoning for the site.

“It’s been a long process to get through,” Buddle said. Prima has owned the property since the early 2000s. It was eventually converted into a community garden as the firm waited for the West End Plan to develop.

“After that, we started talking to the city with letters of enquiry and then we landed on what we could build there.” He said the site allows for additional height, although it was designed to fit within the city’s view cone requirements, resulting in unique angling of the tower.
https://renx.ca/prima-properties-loc...er-condo-tower
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2024, 6:12 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Nothing of interest.
That concourse level has really lost its purpose for small retail services, etc. When the (Italian?) restaurant left many years ago, that was a nail in the coffin way back when.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2024, 7:27 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
That concourse level has really lost its purpose for small retail services, etc. When the (Italian?) restaurant left many years ago, that was a nail in the coffin way back when.
They opened a Japanese bagel place that seems to be popular (?)

Maybe the bank is leaving and they are going to do something with the unit?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 9:15 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,277
2030 Barclay St - 2024 Concept




Google Earth


https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=236880489

Quote:
Talk about a room with a view! This 29 floor building hopes to replace the Rosellen Suites at the edge of Stanley Park with 292 hotel rooms. It also supersedes a previously approved 2018 proposal by Marcon for a 10 storey, 19 strata home development.
https://x.com/City_Duo/status/1820929193242223014
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 5:56 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,433
Looks good! This is exactly the type of development we need in the West End, although adding a few more stories wouldn't hurt. Let's bring in even more hotel and rental spaces downtown. I love it when commercial spaces are now also allowed in traditional residential neighbourhoods.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 6:13 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,021
Funny how when you ban individuals from providing short term rentals, the market adapts...

So much for additional housing supply from banning STR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 7:03 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,274
Gee, funny how the Henriquez proposal for $4 million condos went tits-up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 7:21 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Funny how when you ban individuals from providing short term rentals, the market adapts...

So much for additional housing supply from banning STR.
Rosellen Suites is operated as a hotel. The new proposal is to develop a bigger hotel. In the meantime many of the previously illegally operated short term rentals are being sold to new owners or being rented as normal rentals.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 7:26 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Rosellen Suites is operated as a hotel. The new proposal is to develop a bigger hotel. In the meantime many of the previously illegally operated short term rentals are being sold to new owners or being rented as normal rentals.
Always looking to argue I see.

I'll direct you to read I suppose.

Quote:
It also supersedes a previously approved 2018 proposal by Marcon for a 10 storey, 19 strata home development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 7:37 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Always looking to argue I see.

I'll direct you to read I suppose.
In this case a small hotel is proposed as a larger hotel, so your comment about short term rentals is irrelevant. Marcon never built the condo building, so no housing is being lost.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 8:43 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
In this case a small hotel is proposed as a larger hotel, so your comment about short term rentals is irrelevant. Marcon never built the condo building, so no housing is being lost.
A strata housing building plan was scrapped in favour of a hotel (short term rental) plan. The point is clearly going straight over your head. No housing was lost, but as I originally stated quite clearly, the market adapts and housing development has been de-prioritized in favour of hotel (short term rental) development.

I know, I know, you don't believe in supply, but the facts are the facts regardless of how much you want to argue all the time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.