HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 26, 2024, 10:59 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
[Burnaby] Riviera on the Park | 110.7m | 35Fl | U/C

Riviera on the Park by Ledingham McAllister. This building is set to complete in Summer of 2025 according to the marketing materials.

The boot of this building, which is hidden behind the trees to the left, houses the rental replacement units and contains an outdoor garden terrace roof.

Floor 33 has now been poured, with windows not far behind. Five more levels until the structure is complete. The penthouse is at the 35th level - the additional three levels are from the elevator machine room and surrounding "crown".


Last edited by A320; May 30, 2024 at 9:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 27, 2024, 1:55 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by A320 View Post
Riviera on the Park by Ledingham MacAllister. This building is set to complete in Summer of 2025 according to the marketing materials.

The boot of this building, which is hidden behind the trees to the left, houses the rental replacement units and contains an outdoor garden terrace roof.

Floor 33 has now been poured, with windows not far behind. Five more levels until the structure is complete. The penthouse is at the 35th level - the additional three levels are from the elevator machine room and surrounding "crown".

I was unable to find the height of this building, does anybody know?
I did a quick search and didn't find it either - hardly surprising as Burnaby seems to not like sharing that info (or they don't think anyone really cares). Btw it's at Nelson and Bennett.

Official pages for this - Riviera and LedMac.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 27, 2024, 2:15 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,055
The height is usually listed in the public hearing documents which don't appear to be available anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 28, 2024, 12:03 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,955
I think this is it - Burnaby Updates thread, Nov 2019 (no height though)

Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The Bennett

From UrbanYVR - this is at the north end of the Nelson / Imperial cluster of towers.


https://urbanyvr.com/ledingham-mcall...nett-metrotown


Rendering of The Bennett at 4960 Bennett Street in Burnaby’s Metrotown neighbourhood. Credit: IBI Group
https://urbanyvr.com/ledingham-mcall...nett-metrotown


Rendering of The Bennett at 4960 Bennett Street in Burnaby’s Metrotown neighbourhood. Credit: IBI Group

https://urbanyvr.com/ledingham-mcall...nett-metrotown


Rendering of The Bennett at 4960 Bennett Street in Burnaby’s Metrotown neighbourhood. Credit: IBI Group
https://urbanyvr.com/ledingham-mcall...nett-metrotown


https://urbanyvr.com/ledingham-mcall...nett-metrotown

And here's the updated map of those blocks:

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...94366&page=139

Last edited by officedweller; May 28, 2024 at 12:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 28, 2024, 9:00 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Looks like the project got renamed. And the address changed, as well. It is now at 4988 Bennett Street.

Found some cool drone footage on the developer's social media page: https://www.instagram.com/ledmachomes/reel/C7VAqYAvRpY/

Updating rendering from LedMac:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 29, 2024, 5:51 AM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Managed to dig this up: https://pub-burnaby.escribemeetings....cumentId=44722

The proposed height was 110.7186m according to the linked architectural document by IBI. Title updated!

Another architectural document with the site map: https://pub-burnaby.escribemeetings....cumentId=44725

The rental podium "boot" seems completely separated with its own third elevator.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 29, 2024, 6:30 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,955
Nice, thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 30, 2024, 9:29 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
This building is designed to have two elevator cabs serving the market strata component. This is a ratio of 246/2 = 123 units per elevator.

Remarkably, at the Escala development, there is a ratio of 369/3 = 123 units per elevator, which is precisely the same amount. Aviara is nearly the same at 239/2 = 120 units per elevator.

Where does this number (123) come from? I don't see anything in the BC building code for minimum cars per unit ratio. Surely this could not be a coincidence?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 9:42 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,800
1 per 100 units is a pretty standard ratio to aim for, so at 1:123 the developers are trying to squeeze a bit more out of their vertical transportation, which a savvy buyer should note but a lot wont.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 10:08 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
1:100 doesn't seem standard anymore in Metrotown. Digging into this a bit more:

Nuvo by Anthem has 354/3 = 118 units/elevator
Central Park House has 356/3 = 119 units/elevator
Solhouse 6035 has 479/4 = 120 units/elevator
Concord Metrotown Central Tower has 429/3 = 143 units/elevator (!!!)

Seems like many developers are converging on the magical 120 number. Perhaps that is an upper ceiling on the number of units a single high-speed elevator cab can reasonably service according to some sort of of traffic flow simulation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 10:11 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Riviera, as viewed from the Ground from the Northern side.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 10:52 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by A320 View Post
1:100 doesn't seem standard anymore in Metrotown. Digging into this a bit more:

Nuvo by Anthem has 354/3 = 118 units/elevator
Central Park House has 356/3 = 119 units/elevator
Solhouse 6035 has 479/4 = 120 units/elevator
Concord Metrotown Central Tower has 429/3 = 143 units/elevator (!!!)

Seems like many developers are converging on the magical 120 number. Perhaps that is an upper ceiling on the number of units a single high-speed elevator cab can reasonably service according to some sort of of traffic flow simulation.
I should have said optimal, not standard.

Like I said developers trying to squeeze more out of their VT systems.

It works in a condo when you sell and walk away. Rental buildings built by reputable developers will be more likely to stick close to the 1:100.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 10:00 PM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,892
2024, June 11

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 9:24 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Drone footage provided by LedMac below. It appears that they are very close to the final pour/topping off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5FmZN7k9Hg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2024, 7:12 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Excellent progress is being made on this project. The building is topped out and all floors now have windows.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2024, 7:17 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
Some of the lower floors had balcony railings installed, but it was suddenly removed from all levels. I wonder what happened ... did it not pass an inspection?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2024, 4:48 AM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,892
2024, Sep 1

Topped out

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 3:27 PM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,892
2024, Sep 20

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 5:29 PM
BaddieB BaddieB is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 514
I wonder what's going to happen to that awkwardly small plot of land on the corner of Nelson and Bennett. Perhaps a 6 storey woodframe?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2024, 8:30 PM
A320 A320 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 24
From the Rezoning reference document:

Quote:
3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1 The subject site is within the Marlborough neighbourhood of the Metrotown Downtown
Plan (see Sketch #2 attaclzecf). The adopted Plan identifies this neighbourhood as a high
density neighbourhood that is primarily residential in character, with a strong relationship
to the mixed-use Metro Downtown area and Bonsor Park. With respect to building form,
developments are intended to consist of high-rise residential apartments with low-rise
apartments, townhousing or row-housing podiums fronting bounding streets.

3.2 The site to the west at 4930 Bennett Street, which accommodates an existing strata-titled
apartment building, will be a separate re-development in the future. The development
companies for this and the subject site have explored the potential for a consolidated site,
but have concluded to advance separate applications. The site at 4930 Bennett, while
smaller, is feasible to re-develop in line with the adopted Metrotown Downtown Plan
under its RM5s Multiple Family Residential District designation. A design and pro-forma
analysis was undertaken for the site at 4930 Bennett, which demonstrates that the
development potential under the adopted Plan can generally be achieved. Based on the
smaller site area, under the Bylaw, a permitted density of 4.7 FAR would generate an
approximately 15-storey apartment building ( depending on the final floorplate size), with
underground parking.

Separate developments at this location will add interest and variety to the building forms
and heights. In addition, as this is an important intersection, a highly faceted building at
the corner is expected as an anchor, using form, massing, materiality and color, to
achieve this important urban design objective. One of the conditions of the subject site's
development is to provide access to the site at 4930 Bennett Street via a reciprocal access
driveway from Bennett Street (protected by easement). The applicant of the subject
rezoning application has acknowledged this condition.
That being said, having walked by the area, the lot is tiny and can barely fit the building that exists there today.

If they do end up building a 15 story mid rise, the floor plate (based on the allowable density) would be so small that it would likely only support 4-5 units per floor, and 12 of those units would need to be below-market 1:1 replacement rental. I doubt the economics would be there to support such a project. It will likely be forever orphaned there.

Last edited by A320; Sep 23, 2024 at 8:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.