HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14981  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 2:25 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
St Vincent is very much alive. The roof is done, or nearly, and there's guys in and out of it regularly. It's a monstrous project, I presume gutting is next.

So is our 54 unit at 208 Waterloo. Just some delays, same with Barrack Green.

Queen Square North was basically a rezoning request with a very long timeline attached, Historica didn't make any big promises AFAIK.

Landmark and Crown/Leinster were never more than land purchases, rezoning, and renders. Almost everyone here was highly sceptical of the Landmark in particular.

Ethos Ridge is an extreme dud.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14982  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 10:50 AM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 746
I heard city officials discuss the Landmark recently as if it was still on the table, someone senior described the infrastructure work down Charlotte and in the South End beyond Lower Cover as being required for servicing large projects and named it specifically.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14983  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 12:50 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour View Post
I heard city officials discuss the Landmark recently as if it was still on the table, someone senior described the infrastructure work down Charlotte and in the South End beyond Lower Cover as being required for servicing large projects and named it specifically.
Not to get conspiratorial, but I'd bet 'the Landmark' doesn't actually mean that building right now; they're probably using it as a euphuism for whatever [Cooke or someone else?] is planning south of Vulcan St, which is very much up in the air.

AFAIK the infra work along Sydney south of Broad to Tin Can Beach last summer checked any boxes needed for a development on the Landmark site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14984  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 1:11 PM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Not to get conspiratorial, but I'd bet 'the Landmark' doesn't actually mean that building right now; they're probably using it as a euphuism for whatever [Cooke or someone else?] is planning south of Vulcan St, which is very much up in the air.

AFAIK the infra work along Sydney south of Broad to Tin Can Beach last summer checked any boxes needed for a development on the Landmark site.
Very possible indeed, I was just repeating what I had been told over the past few weeks. I would love if something large happened down there, it would really help spread the flow of the city - and investment - further south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14985  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 1:59 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,912
Project card for the Irving Pulp Mill upgrades are on the CCD Canada website.

Quote:
“Starting Date (estimated): N/A
Location: SAINT JOHN (NB)
Size: $765,700,000.00
Stage: 4-Drawing
Published: 2024-07-15
Last Update: 2024-07-15

Work type: Expansion / Addition
Sector: Private
Category: 1-Industrial
Subcategorie: 1M-Pulp & Paper
Disciplines: Architecture, Civil, Electricity, Environment, Equipment, HVAC, Instrumentation, Building mechanic, Industrial mechanic, Industrial process, Structural, Other

DESCRIPTION:

PULP MILL UPGRADE & EXPANSION

Located in Saint John, this project (Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd), estimated at $765 700 000 is in the drawings stage. It is scheduled to begin in January 2025. Works concern the modernization and expansion of the pulp mill to increase production capacity to 1 800 metric tons of Kraft pulp per day and 140 MW of electrical power. It includes site preparation, modification of building space; construction of equipment foundations and a heat recovery boiler, the expansion of the recaustification plant and the installation of steam turbines, generators, emergency back-up burners, a chimney flue gases, evaporators, electrostatic precipitators, piping, compressors and pumps”.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14986  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2024, 3:04 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour View Post
Very possible indeed, I was just repeating what I had been told over the past few weeks. I would love if something large happened down there, it would really help spread the flow of the city - and investment - further south.
Yep. AFAIK these PANs are where any actual construction would happen.
https://paol-efel.snb.ca/paol.html?v...n&pan=05139870
https://paol-efel.snb.ca/paol.html?v...n&pan=01619705

Maybe the bit of the spur rail ROW west of Sydney too https://paol-efel.snb.ca/paol.html?v...n&pan=05053155

I don't know if any plans include much more than landscaping and remediation of the Lantic site proper, but I am not in the loop at all on this, of course. https://paol-efel.snb.ca/paol.html?v...n&pan=01619543

There's a lot of potential down at the tip of the South End (47 to 59 Broad, 182 to 190 Britain, surplus land south of the Garrison, the bottom of Germain, Victor Train's dozen lots between St James/Charlotte/Ross, etc. Level land, no particular obvious construction challenges, zoning would assuredly be flexible around all-residential and mixed use.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14987  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 2:52 AM
dhottawa729's Avatar
dhottawa729 dhottawa729 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 230
Saint John Future Skyline

I was really curious how 91 King and Fundy Quay would impact the skyline so out came Sketchup and Google Earth to the rescue. I wish 91 King was a lot taller and Fundy Quay a lot shorter, to be honest! It would have been ideal to have the taller buildings on top of the hill with the shorter buildings hiding the hill as it gives the impression of taller buildings and results in a more impressive skyline. Zooming around from all angles, it’s hard to find a picture-perfect skyline angle. If Fundy Quay ends up being very high quality, this might not be so bad though! I had to try to convince myself the weird things atop 91 King were fine, but I still hate them. A 19-storey building at 91 King would have looked amazing!









Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14988  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 3:21 AM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,316


Looks good!

You should also post this in the Future Skylines thread in the Canada section too.

EDIT - Did it myself.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go

Last edited by MonctonRad; Jul 16, 2024 at 12:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14989  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 12:42 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
Lorneville opposition to industrial park at 800 signatures. Ignoring them is imperative. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-b...tion-1.7263744

Interestingly, the city is extending water services- presumably from Spruce Lake- so this isn't a warehouse with ~30 employees being proposed. Must be a serious industrial user.

This link about the expansion is useful: https://shapeyourcitysaintjohn.ca/sp...1pvfkJT1AATNHQ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14990  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 1:11 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Lorneville opposition to industrial park at 800 signatures. Ignoring them is imperative.
Agreed.

I'm quite surprised there would be any resistance at all; but some people have low agreeability. Now we know who....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14991  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 1:43 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhottawa729 View Post
I was really curious how 91 King and Fundy Quay would impact the skyline so out came Sketchup and Google Earth to the rescue. I wish 91 King was a lot taller and Fundy Quay a lot shorter, to be honest! It would have been ideal to have the taller buildings on top of the hill with the shorter buildings hiding the hill as it gives the impression of taller buildings and results in a more impressive skyline. Zooming around from all angles, it’s hard to find a picture-perfect skyline angle. If Fundy Quay ends up being very high quality, this might not be so bad though! I had to try to convince myself the weird things atop 91 King were fine, but I still hate them. A 19-storey building at 91 King would have looked amazing!









91 King would have looked a lot better as 19+ storeys. Guess we need to attract developers from outside the area to get such projects built here in SJ. Hopefully one day…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14992  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 2:31 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,513
I'm actually surprised at how spread out those taller buildings look. In most cities' skylines you see a fairly tight cluster of highrises overlapping.

Wonder what that iconic view you get from the Throughway when you crest the hill on the Westside will look like? That's the angle I always picture when I think of SJ's skyline.

Last edited by sailor734; Jul 16, 2024 at 3:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14993  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 2:59 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
Agreed.

I'm quite surprised there would be any resistance at all; but some people have low agreeability. Now we know who....
If they lived in bucolic woodlands I'd get it, but this is an extension to an existing industrial park, among a bunch of wind turbines, up the road from Coleson Cove. Whatever it is, it should provide a bunch of jobs and has to jump through a bunch of environmental regulatory approval hoops.

The actual 'sensitive wetlands' are on the other side of this PAN anyway, and should be protected as they're part of the Musquash watershed.

Not development-related, but consolidating the various provincial, federal, Nature Conservancy, and Ducks Unlimited protected areas around Musqash, along with some private land, into a second Fundy National Park would be an extremely good idea. It's already riddled with trails and has a different biome/geology than Fundy's current lands, and could be connected in some way to the Loch Alva wilderness area. Splitting the baby is possible here!

It would not be too onerous to connect the Split Rock/Black Beach/Five Fathom trail network to the Irving Nature Park with a few roadside stretches in between.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14994  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 3:29 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Not development-related, but consolidating the various provincial, federal, Nature Conservancy, and Ducks Unlimited protected areas around Musqash, along with some private land, into a second Fundy National Park would be an extremely good idea. It's already riddled with trails and has a different biome/geology than Fundy's current lands, and could be connected in some way to the Loch Alva wilderness area. Splitting the baby is possible here!

It would not be too onerous to connect the Split Rock/Black Beach/Five Fathom trail network to the Irving Nature Park with a few roadside stretches in between.
That's an interesting idea. Or as Keji has as an seashore adjunct.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14995  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 7:16 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,902
To elaborate on the Musquash-area land, here's a detailed map of ~12 discontiguous Nature Conservancy parcels (13 counting nearby Round mMadow Cove): https://ncc-gis.maps.arcgis.com/apps...84a0ac25cc4f12 Loch Alva is picked out pretty cleanly north of this.

Musquash Estuary Marine Protected Area (federal): https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/mpa...index-eng.html

Can't find any detail on the Ducks Unlimited lands.

We also don't need three different kinds of protected area in the Fundy National Park vicinity. Big Salmon and Little Salmon Rivers, and nearby Dowdall Lake, Protected Natural Areas, plus the Fundy Trail, and scattered Conservancy, PNA, etc. land in southern Albert County should all be combined with the National Park.

~5 different conservation-oriented regimes govern what really isn't that much territory, often bordering each other. We have an opportunity to really enhance natural protection on the Fundy coast and better market ourselves as a place where you can have serious industry and wilderness in proximity. I doubt Musquash would become a second Alma, but Saint John would surely benefit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14996  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 10:12 PM
Woho Woho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Lorneville opposition to industrial park at 800 signatures. Ignoring them is imperative. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-b...tion-1.7263744

Interestingly, the city is extending water services- presumably from Spruce Lake- so this isn't a warehouse with ~30 employees being proposed. Must be a serious industrial user.

This link about the expansion is useful: https://shapeyourcitysaintjohn.ca/sp...1pvfkJT1AATNHQ
So who's going to organize a petition in support of the industrial park? I'll sign it and I know many others will too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14997  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 11:34 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,513
Might be easier to either support or oppose the expansion if we knew the plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14998  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 2:17 AM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,912
From an AllNewBrunswick article from July 9th that is available to view for free as a “sample issue”.

Apparently developer, Erik de Jong, is doing another new project but in Grand Bay-Westfield. This one is a partnership with Maple Leaf Homes of Fredericton on a 24-unit townhouse and garden home development.

In the article was an update on the St.Vincent’s and St. Patrick’s projects.

“While he prepares to take on Colonel Nase Boulevard, de Jong is also busy with multiple projects in Saint John.

At the former St. Patrick's School on the city's west side, de Jong said the project to transform it into apartments is now out for tender.

At the former St. Vincent's on Cliff Street, de Jong said crews have finished roof work and are now working on mold and asbestos abatement, which he expects will take four to six months”.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14999  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 12:08 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
From an AllNewBrunswick article from July 9th that is available to view for free as a “sample issue”.

Apparently developer, Erik de Jong, is doing another new project but in Grand Bay-Westfield. This one is a partnership with Maple Leaf Homes of Fredericton on a 24-unit townhouse and garden home development.

In the article was an update on the St.Vincent’s and St. Patrick’s projects.

“While he prepares to take on Colonel Nase Boulevard, de Jong is also busy with multiple projects in Saint John.

At the former St. Patrick's School on the city's west side, de Jong said the project to transform it into apartments is now out for tender.

At the former St. Vincent's on Cliff Street, de Jong said crews have finished roof work and are now working on mold and asbestos abatement, which he expects will take four to six months”.
Great to hear that things are moving ahead.

The Grand Bay project is interesting due to the modular, prefab home angle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15000  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2024, 5:02 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Lorneville opposition to industrial park at 800 signatures. Ignoring them is imperative. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-b...tion-1.7263744

Interestingly, the city is extending water services- presumably from Spruce Lake- so this isn't a warehouse with ~30 employees being proposed. Must be a serious industrial user.

This link about the expansion is useful: https://shapeyourcitysaintjohn.ca/sp...1pvfkJT1AATNHQ
I notice the mayor felt compelled to tweet a denial that the expansion was to provide a new home for AIM.

Rumours must be flying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.