Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal
I guess that is the difference. In Canada between provinces you pay tax where you live not where you work. This actually makes more sense because how does it work in Europe when many people work in Luxembourg but live in Germany or France? France just has to eat all the cost of their education and healthcare?
|
It's a win-win situation that you guys don't seem to understand. When French people resident in the French suburbs of Geneva work in Geneva, they pay their income tax in Geneva (where it's lower than in France), but France benefits from the Geneva economy in many ways: houses get built on the French side of the border, the consumer economy is booming on the French side of the border, this in turn attracts more businesses on the French side of the border.
The French part of the Geneva metro area is the fastest growing in France. Its growth rate is akin to the fastest growing US Sunbelt metro areas. At the last census (2021), a record 444,000 people lived in the French part of the Geneva metro area. This is a population that is now larger than the entire metro area of Angers, and close to the metro area of Orléans. Within 30 years, it will become more populated than the metro areas of Nice or Rouen. If we applied the same weird taxation system as you have, this area would never have developed, as people would have had no incentive to settle on the French side of the border.
The same is true for Northern Alsace: the dozens of municipalities there benefit tremendously from their closeness to Karlsruhe and other German economic centers. They would be far more economically depressed if the cross-border worker status didn't exist. Ditto for Southern Alsace next to Basel, or northern Moselle close to Luxembourg.