Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn99
That would be better than nothing. An underpass prone to flooding and a overpass like @ Birds Hill park too expensive unless the feds chip in. Have to wonder how many years away this will be come reality. 10, 20+.
|
Yea I would vouch for many other AT infrastructure pieces over an overpass for the Harte trail. The Harte trail serves primarily recreational users, whereas an AT (BRT?) bridge at the U of M, or any of the proposed river crossings in the downtown area (River Ave to Assiniboine, St B to Point Douglas) would capture a higher number of daily users of both commuters and recreational users.
The reroute down to Wilkes on the Harte Trail adds about 2km to travel over crossing the Perimeter. Depending on time of day and traffic volumes, I would either risk crossing the Perimeter or take the extra 6-8 mins by bike to cover that distance.
If an AT bridge cut my commute distance by 2 km I would be much more likely to cycle to work at a higher frequency (currently about 2x weekly)