HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #901  
Old Posted May 14, 2024, 12:32 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,075
Amtrak missed a big opportunity for New Jersey-native Bon Jovi to note they are halfway there.

Amtrak, NJ Transit announce new Portal North Bridge halfway complete and on budget

By Anthony Johnson
May 13, 2024
ABC 7

"NEW JERSEY (WABC) -- Amtrak and New Jersey Transit announced Monday that the new Portal North Bridge is halfway complete.

It is the biggest transportation project in the nation, they said, and it is making good progress.

While trains are still running over the old Portal Bridge, the passengers can see what will be the new bridge and catch a glimpse of the future taking shape..."

https://abc7ny.com/post/amtrak-and-n...lete/14808274/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #902  
Old Posted May 14, 2024, 1:28 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,183
Jeez, did they bring in the Chinese to build this???
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #903  
Old Posted May 15, 2024, 12:06 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Jeez, did they bring in the Chinese to build this???
This is damage control.

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...t/73592095007/

Quote:
The drastic increase in outages also meant a need for more labor, which increased Amtrak’s budget by 140%, but it hasn’t affected the overall budget of the project because Amtrak is using its contingency funds for unforeseen events that are already factored into the cost.
I would not consider this to be "on budget". Any project of this nature will have a big contingency, but a 40% increase is an abject failure, not a reason to pat yourself on the back.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #904  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 5:39 PM
Paniolo Man's Avatar
Paniolo Man Paniolo Man is offline
Lahaina Strong
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Murray, Utah.
Posts: 691
Way to little Amtrak discussion around here.

I FOIA'd the lift of manufacturers who recieved the RFP for LD rolling stock.



Quote:
6 Car Builders received the solicitation on 12/22/2023. Alstom, Hitachi, Siemens, CAF, Kawasaki and Stadler. These Car Builders were those that not only were qualified, but interested.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #905  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 6:18 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,183
Pretty much the gang assumed to be players. Thanks for doing the FOIA though, that's above and beyond, plus now we know here before it's official.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #906  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 12:13 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,075
Amtrak Awards Contract to Build New Connecticut River Bridge

June 28, 2024

"OLD SAYBROOK/OLD LYME, Conn. – Amtrak will soon begin construction of a new, modern Connecticut River Bridge to replace the existing bridge following the award of a construction contract to O&G/Tutor Perini, a Joint Venture. This milestone comes on the heels of recent permit approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

The new Connecticut River Bridge will improve reliability and reduce delays for Amtrak’s intercity services, Connecticut Shore Line East commuter service and freight operators along the Northeast Corridor (NEC), America’s busiest rail corridor. This is one of several passenger rail improvement projects in the State of Connecticut, including the Connecticut Department of Transportation’s Devon Bridge and Walk Bridge replacement projects, among others..."

"💲 How it’s paid for: The approximately $1.3 billion project is primarily funded by the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act (IIJA), thanks to a $826.64 million federal grant awarded by FRA. The remaining portion will be funded by Amtrak and the State of Connecticut..."

https://media.amtrak.com/2024/06/amt...-river-bridge/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #907  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 5:18 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,514
Utter waste of money. They should have built a new alignment along I-95 between Old Saybrook and Westerly, per the original plan, instead of doubling down on the twisty Shore Line from the 1800s.

__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #908  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 5:35 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,183
I'm all for that but it would have turned a 1.3 billion bridge replacement into a probably multiple billions more mega-project. I'm sure all parties involved believed it was wiser to precision target the immediate concern and that was a century old bridge with a third world speed restriction. It is what it is. My more immediate complaint is they determined pursuing a higher fixed span bridge was going to "negatively affect wetlands" with the earthworks required for long approaches. Thus the decision to recommit to an old lift bridge design, with the added benefit of being entirely aesthetically charmless, this time with a first world 70mph speed limit. Genius.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin

Last edited by Busy Bee; Jul 1, 2024 at 6:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #909  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 2:31 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,050
Yeah, they need to replace the bridge. Everyone knows the alignment needs to eventually be shifted northwards, but the present operation needs a new bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #910  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 10:56 AM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,075
And here is another bridge replacement on the Northeast corridor.

Amtrak to begin $2.7B replacement of Havre de Grace train bridge next year

By Matt Hubbard 
The Baltimore Sun
Jul 1, 2024

"The historic train bridge spanning the Susquehanna River from Havre de Grace to Perryville is set to be demolished and replaced by 2030, as part of a $2.7 billion Amtrak infrastructure improvement project.

The project is part of Amtrak’s $50 billion program that aims to double ridership through infrastructure improvements from Washington, D.C., to Boston by 2040..."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/07...dge-next-year/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #911  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 2:48 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is online now
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,322
The Walk Bridge is also under construction...no word on the Pelham Bay Bridge replacement..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #912  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 6:16 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I'm all for that but it would have turned a 1.3 billion bridge replacement into a probably multiple billions more mega-project. I'm sure all parties involved believed it was wiser to precision target the immediate concern and that was a century old bridge with a third world speed restriction. It is what it is. My more immediate complaint is they determined pursuing a higher fixed span bridge was going to "negatively affect wetlands" with the earthworks required for long approaches. Thus the decision to recommit to an old lift bridge design, with the added benefit of being entirely aesthetically charmless, this time with a first world 70mph speed limit. Genius.
They could have spent 20% of this cost on a refurbishment for the next 20 years while the new alignment is being planned. This is way too much money to spend for something that is obsolete on Day 1.

Instead, the new alignment is radioactively toxic among some of the grumpiest, most entitled NIMBYs this side of California, and a new alignment is no longer planned at all except possibly a dotted line that runs inland and bypasses Providence.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #913  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2024, 3:35 PM
sammyg sammyg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 381
This bridge is as close to I-95 as you can get. The rest of the alignment can be fixed and still use this bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #914  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2024, 6:15 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
They could have spent 20% of this cost on a refurbishment for the next 20 years while the new alignment is being planned. This is way too much money to spend for something that is obsolete on Day 1.
The new bridge will get 20-30 years of service, easy. A new alignment will eventually come, but absolute best case scenario is 20-30 years from now. That's worthwhile, considering the old bridge has super-slow speeds and breaks down all the time. Acela is doubling service, and that would be impossible without these bridge replacements.

Ultimately, I believe the new alignment will actually be via Hartford. That route is faster, less NIMBY and covers more population. A shorefront alignment would require tunneling. The shorefront line will remain vital, but more for local/commuter traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #915  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2024, 11:49 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,075
USDOT’s Pete Buttigieg helps kick off $1.1 billion passenger rail project in Raleigh


Gov. Roy Cooper shakes hands with U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg during an event at Raleigh Union Station on Dec. 11, 2023, to celebrate construction of the first leg of a high-speed rail line between the Triangle and Richmond, Va. KAITLIN MCKEOWN

Raleigh News & Observer
By Richard Stradling
July 1, 2024

"U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg took part in a groundbreaking ceremony in North Raleigh on Monday for a bridge that will carry Durant Road over a railroad line.

The bridge is part of a $1.3 billion project to provide passenger service between downtown Raleigh and Wake Forest by 2030. It’s the first leg of what state and federal officials say will be a direct high-speed rail connection between Raleigh; Richmond, Virginia, and the Northeast..."


https://www.newsobserver.com/news/lo...#storylink=cpy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #916  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 8:11 PM
TowerDude TowerDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 333
Construction Begins on Livingston Avenue Rail Bridge Replacement
https://www.rtands.com/track-constru...e-replacement/
ALBANY, N.Y. -Construction has begun on a $634.8 million project to replace the Livingston Avenue Rail Bridge, which will replace the Civil War-era passenger rail bridge spanning the Hudson River between the cities of Albany and Rensselaer and provide a “modern crossing that will improve service and reliability along New York State’s Empire Corridor and throughout the entire Northeast.”

Additionally, Gov. Hochul also announced a $10 million award to demolish the Central Warehouse, a blighted building in Downtown Albany, pieces of which have fallen onto nearby rail tracks “disrupting Amtrak service for thousands of New Yorkers.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #917  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 9:55 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,075
Bridges and tunnels!

Amtrak awards construction contract for East River Tunnel rehabilitation

Progressive Railroading
July 16, 2024


"Amtrak will begin the East River Tunnel's rehabilitation in New York City later this year following the award of a construction contract to a Skanska E-J ERT Joint Venture.

The tunnel is comprised of four tubes, two of which require significant repairs and comprehensive reconstruction following damage caused by floodwaters that entered the tunnel during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, according to an Amtrak release.

The $1.6 billion project calls for demolishing all existing tunnel systems down to the liner, then restoring both tubes. During the project, one tube will be closed at a time, minimizing service impacts while maximizing track access for construction and renewing the tunnel infrastructure to last another 100 years, Amtrak officials said..."

https://www.progressiverailroading.c...itation--72362
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #918  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 5:45 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,514
Woah they are gonna close the North River tubes for repairs before the new Gateway tunnels are in place? Holy shit, that will affect the entire NEC and NJT networks.

Can Amtrak/NJT run more trains into Hoboken while the work is ongoing?
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #919  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 6:19 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is online now
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Woah they are gonna close the North River tubes for repairs before the new Gateway tunnels are in place? Holy shit, that will affect the entire NEC and NJT networks.

Can Amtrak/NJT run more trains into Hoboken while the work is ongoing?
NJT has cut all direct service into Hoboken from the Coast line and RVL back in 2020...and refuses to restore it even on days when the tunnels have issues. Amtrak could and should come up with a plan to terminate at Hoboken...which is largely used as a storage terminal with trains sitting on the same track for hours at a time..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #920  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 9:56 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,183
What are we talking about? This is about the East River tubes.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:03 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.