HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3881  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 3:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
I think part of the reason the Crosstown is so behind is because Metrolinx is trying to avoid a repeat of Ottawa.

The line is effectively done at this point and could probably open tomorrow if Metrolinx wanted to. They are just being ridiculously rigorous with pre-opening testing.
That explains why the final stretch is taking a while, but doesn't explain why it's 4 years late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3882  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 4:39 PM
GeneralLeeTPHLS's Avatar
GeneralLeeTPHLS GeneralLeeTPHLS is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
I think part of the reason the Crosstown is so behind is because Metrolinx is trying to avoid a repeat of Ottawa.

The line is effectively done at this point and could probably open tomorrow if Metrolinx wanted to. They are just being ridiculously rigorous with pre-opening testing.
Yeah, this is how I see it too. But it still infuriates me whenever I walk 5 minutes in any direction to see pristine, well taken care off LRT station buildings (even active landscaping going on) that are fenced off.
The new street redesign of part of Yonge and Eglinton is a good step in the right direction, but with its flaws typical to Toronto or any city cutting corners.

That being said, it is nice to at least have 80% of the street level construction away and done with for now. Until of course the second phase of Eglinton's redesign goes forth.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3883  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 10:05 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Stage 3 Ottawa won't happen anytime soon. Doug is using the issues with Stage 1 as an excuse to hold funding, and Mayor "Stop the War on Cars!" agrees.

Funny how Ford thinks Ottawa mismanaged Stage 1 so bad that he's holding funding, but keeps pouring tens of Billions on Metrolinx projects when they can't even get the Crosstown open.

So yeah, GTA projects are not in danger because they are highly supported by the Province, but nothing else will get built anywhere else in Ontario if Skippy gets in.
We all know that when Conservatives get into power, the City of Ottawa stagnates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3884  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 10:45 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Stage 3 Ottawa won't happen anytime soon. Doug is using the issues with Stage 1 as an excuse to hold funding, and Mayor "Stop the War on Cars!" agrees.

Funny how Ford thinks Ottawa mismanaged Stage 1 so bad that he's holding funding, but keeps pouring tens of Billions on Metrolinx projects when they can't even get the Crosstown open.

So yeah, GTA projects are not in danger because they are highly supported by the Province, but nothing else will get built anywhere else in Ontario if Skippy gets in.

Sounds to me like an issue of municipal politics being different in Ottawa vs. in the GTA. In Ottawa, there's clearly a constituency for "war on cars" rhetoric and anti-transit policy; whereas in Toronto that has largely been relegated to a fringe view and there is instead a fairly bi-partisan consensus on transit development.

Hence, funding transit in Toronto is an easier, more political expedient opportunity for a politician at the provincial or federal level, as it translates directly to support. Why spend precious infrastructure dollars on a city where it's going to be politically contentious and even the mayor supposedly doesn't want it?
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3885  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:23 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Sounds to me like an issue of municipal politics being different in Ottawa vs. in the GTA. In Ottawa, there's clearly a constituency for "war on cars" rhetoric and anti-transit policy; whereas in Toronto that has largely been relegated to a fringe view and there is instead a fairly bi-partisan consensus on transit development.

Hence, funding transit in Toronto is an easier, more political expedient opportunity for a politician at the provincial or federal level, as it translates directly to support. Why spend precious infrastructure dollars on a city where it's going to be politically contentious and even the mayor supposedly doesn't want it?
It's always been that way, even when Ottawa had a more progressive City Halls compared to Toronto. Stage 1 and 2, City of Ottawa got less than 33% funding. In fact, City of Ottawa had to pay 50% for Stage 2 ultimately. Meanwhile, the City of Toronto and GTA have continuously received 100% upper level funding for subway lines and commuter rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3886  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:51 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
It's always been that way, even when Ottawa had a more progressive City Halls compared to Toronto. Stage 1 and 2, City of Ottawa got less than 33% funding. In fact, City of Ottawa had to pay 50% for Stage 2 ultimately. Meanwhile, the City of Toronto and GTA have continuously received 100% upper level funding for subway lines and commuter rail.
I'll definitely admit that Toronto gets favoured by higher governments than Ottawa when it comes to money for transit expansion, but I think the roots of that kind of snuck up on higher governments, rather than Toronto being automatically the darling of premiers and prime ministers.

The government of Ontario created GO transit because Toronto extended over multiple regions/counties and there was a clear need for some kind of regional transit provider. As the suburban regions expanded and there was a need for even more regional transit and system integration, Metrolinx was created and swallowed GO. After that, Metrolinx took on a bit of a life of its own, eventually becoming the main stakeholder in building rapid transit of any kind even if it was wholly within a single municipality and didn't really serve any regional travel needs (e.g. Finch LRT).

Since Ottawa's entire metropolitan region on the Ontario side is wholly within what was formerly Ottawa-Carleton, there was never a need to create a parallel agency to OC Transpo to deliver regional transit.

Ottawa is even worse off since 1/4 of the metro population lives in Quebec and the provinces don't coordinate with each other. In any other Canadian city, a LRT connecting Gatineau to downtown Ottawa would have made the Phase 2 priority list and would be u/c by now. In Washington DC, the Federal government by act of Congress created WMATA (operator of the Washington Metro) as a pact between the District, Virginia and Maryland to ensure that the metro system actually served regional needs. This is not on the Feds' radar, but ideally STO and OC Transpo could be merged into something like this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3887  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 3:08 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
Ottawa is even worse off since 1/4 of the metro population lives in Quebec and the provinces don't coordinate with each other. In any other Canadian city, a LRT connecting Gatineau to downtown Ottawa would have made the Phase 2 priority list and would be u/c by now. In Washington DC, the Federal government by act of Congress created WMATA (operator of the Washington Metro) as a pact between the District, Virginia and Maryland to ensure that the metro system actually served regional needs. This is not on the Feds' radar, but ideally STO and OC Transpo could be merged into something like this.
Cooperation between provinces? Or make a NCR that actually encompasses the entire metro? Are you mad?!?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.