Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
One can say the quote is open to interpretation
But then you look at the LPC's policy actions the last few years and it certainly looks congruent with less charitable interpretations of that quote.
They are toast. Deservedly so. The only question now is whether the next government cares more about the young, or making sure the old have gold plated retirements.
|
The LPC is so brutal to the young, that the CPC can also throw them mostly under the bus, while still getting their votes as the “party that cares the most about the young (of the two)”.
So I wouldn’t expect too much from PP, my guess is he’ll be just slightly less all-in on the maximum generational inequity stuff than JT. Why have any other position? As long as you’re perceived as the youth-friendly option (relatively), you’ll get the votes.
Threaded Mode