HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11681  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2024, 3:12 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,926
The Housing Accelerator Fund changes are on Heritage Advisory Committee's agenda for next week. It'll hit Regional Council on the 23rd.

April 17, 2024 Heritage Advisory Committee Agenda
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11682  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2024, 4:19 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
5 Floors | 50 Units | Mixed-Use | $9.5 M | 25 Crystal Drive, Dartmouth | Unknown


HalifaxDevelopments.ca (Photo by David Jackson)
25 Crystal Drive had it's building permit issued last week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11683  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2024, 5:49 PM
RoshanMcG RoshanMcG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Halifax
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoshanMcG View Post
Don't think there is a thread for this but it appears to be called The Delmore





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11684  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2024, 11:54 PM
terrynorthend terrynorthend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,211
Man that Suburban Site Specific request document is depressing. Staff has gutted most of the requests in the name of HA dogma. Eg. A request for multiple 12-18 story developments within 800 metres of the Bedford have been cut to maximum of 5 storys.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
The Housing Accelerator Fund changes are on Heritage Advisory Committee's agenda for next week. It'll hit Regional Council on the 23rd.

April 17, 2024 Heritage Advisory Committee Agenda
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11685  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 3:34 AM
HarbingerDe HarbingerDe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrynorthend View Post
Man that Suburban Site Specific request document is depressing. Staff has gutted most of the requests in the name of HA dogma. Eg. A request for multiple 12-18 story developments within 800 metres of the Bedford have been cut to maximum of 5 storys.
The Boomer NIMBY groups are all over Facebook celebrating their victories and "progress" in the crusade against solving the housing crisis.

It's incredibly infuriating. These people are lobbying to create generations of pain and financial suffering for everyone who didn't ride the housing rocket to wealth and a comfortable retirement like they did.

They fight development at every opportunity even though, ironically, most of them will never even live long enough to see the developments they so vehemently oppose... The rest of us will certainly have to live with the fallout for decades/generations though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11686  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 4:55 AM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,352
Ah yes... another installment of "us vs them" rhetoric on SSP. I was missing that as it seemed to have fallen off recently. All is right again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11687  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 11:40 AM
Arrdeeharharharbour Arrdeeharharharbour is offline
Cap the Cut!
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
Ah yes... another installment of "us vs them" rhetoric on SSP. I was missing that as it seemed to have fallen off recently. All is right again.

I agree that negativity is no fun but in this poster's defense the document is a discouraging read. This is especially true given that there is no rationale provided for denying what seems to be reasonable. My immediate take away after a first read through is that the top two reasons for denying requests for additional height are: 1, ensure there is not enough density along major routes to support mass transit and 2, cluster same-height buildings together to ensure the most boring and unattractive built-form possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11688  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 1:07 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour View Post
I agree that negativity is no fun but in this poster's defense the document is a discouraging read. This is especially true given that there is no rationale provided for denying what seems to be reasonable. My immediate take away after a first read through is that the top two reasons for denying requests for additional height are: 1, ensure there is not enough density along major routes to support mass transit and 2, cluster same-height buildings together to ensure the most boring and unattractive built-form possible.
Absolutely. Then slam the document and leave out the ageism/culture war crap. It's not my place to tell people what to post, but crap like "most of them will never even live long enough to see the developments they so vehemently oppose" doesn't do anything to advance the discussion.

Just my opinion. I like to keep things more about the development and less about personal feelings towards particular groups of people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11689  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 4:46 PM
HarbingerDe HarbingerDe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
Absolutely. Then slam the document and leave out the ageism/culture war crap. It's not my place to tell people what to post, but crap like "most of them will never even live long enough to see the developments they so vehemently oppose" doesn't do anything to advance the discussion.

Just my opinion. I like to keep things more about the development and less about personal feelings towards particular groups of people.
I understand that the optics of my post are "controversial". But I consider my frustration to be completely warranted.

Given that your name is "OldDartmouthMark" I'm going to go out on a limb and assume you own a home, have a decently rent-capped apartment, or otherwise we're able to benefit from the previous decades of affordable housing and rental options to secure financial stability.

I appreciate that you're here supporting development, and enjoy uncontroversial discussion of the aesthetics and shape of housing development in our city. It is a privilege and a luxury to view housing development through that lens. I do not have that luxury.

Every canceled or dramatically limited developed further erodes my chances (and the chances of everyone who didn't get into the housing market pre-pandemic because they were too young or for any other reason) of ever owning a home or even simply surviving comfortably without the constant threat of renoviction.

I have an engineering degree. I make $70,000/yr. Yet between paying off my student loans, and paying for the car (that I need to reliably commute to my job) I cannot afford to live in this city. Hell I can barely afford to split a 2-bedroom apartment in this city if I want to contribute to my savings.

The situation is dire and getting worse by the day, so forgive me for being frustrated with people who (in their ignorance) are dead set on either making me (and people worse off than me) homeless or financially crippled for the rest of our lives by these absurd rental/housing prices.

Also, it is not ageism; it is simply a fact. I can start providing links to the Facebook community groups behind this anti-development lobbying if youd really like... The demographics are quite consistent, and unsurprising.

Most people my age can barely afford to survive. They certainly do not have the time to lobby the government to prevent new housing developments. These anti-developmemt groups are overwhelming comprised of Boomer and older Gen-X homeowners. It's a simple fact whether you like it or not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11690  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 5:02 PM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarbingerDe View Post

I have an engineering degree. I make $70,000/yr. Yet between paying off my student loans, and paying for the car (that I need to reliably commute to my job) I cannot afford to live in this city. Hell I can barely afford to split a 2-bedroom apartment in this city if I want to contribute to my savings.
I make only a little more, but because I'm A: in a relationship with another income earner and B: bought a house nine years ago, before prices went through the roof, my costs of living are relatively low and I'm easily able to have a decent house in the North End, lots of money for saving and trips, etc. This is purely due to lucky timing on my part. If I had waited a few more years to buy, I'd be effectively priced out of the peninsula. Realistically I could afford a nice one-bedroom in a new development, but it would eat up far more of my income and leave precious little for savings, etc. I have plenty of friends just a handful of years younger than me in that situation, who are either priced out, despite making reasonable incomes, or who are spending an unreasonable amount of their income on shelter.

So I think it's absolutely fair to critique the "boomer NIMBY groups". I've seen their Facebook posts too, and it's true that for the most part they appear to be composed of very well-housed folks, 50-plus or 60-plus, who have been homeowners for decades and who are insulated from the personal effects of the housing shortage but who are very affronted at the idea that their neighbourhoods are set to evolve significantly. There is very much a sensibility that the current form of their neighbourhoods is ideal, that attempts to change it are somehow an attack on their communities, and the more they can slow down densification and housing growth the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11691  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 6:49 PM
Dartguard Dartguard is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
I make only a little more, but because I'm A: in a relationship with another income earner and B: bought a house nine years ago, before prices went through the roof, my costs of living are relatively low and I'm easily able to have a decent house in the North End, lots of money for saving and trips, etc. This is purely due to lucky timing on my part. If I had waited a few more years to buy, I'd be effectively priced out of the peninsula. Realistically I could afford a nice one-bedroom in a new development, but it would eat up far more of my income and leave precious little for savings, etc. I have plenty of friends just a handful of years younger than me in that situation, who are either priced out, despite making reasonable incomes, or who are spending an unreasonable amount of their income on shelter.

So I think it's absolutely fair to critique the "boomer NIMBY groups". I've seen their Facebook posts too, and it's true that for the most part they appear to be composed of very well-housed folks, 50-plus or 60-plus, who have been homeowners for decades and who are insulated from the personal effects of the housing shortage but who are very affronted at the idea that their neighbourhoods are set to evolve significantly. There is very much a sensibility that the current form of their neighbourhoods is ideal, that attempts to change it are somehow an attack on their communities, and the more they can slow down densification and housing growth the better.
I am one of thoses Boomers near the end of my Worklife and I definitely have some empathy for Younger folks in our Province that have done the "right things".You stayed out of jail, got an education, took on the debt to probably deliver on that with the Housing ladder just out of reach. Covid comes along and Zoom, those with got way more while pulling that ladder even higher. I have a nephew that just moved back from Newfoundland after
achieving a PHD in Physics. He is working two jobs between the Defence sector and teaching at St Mary's but he and his wife are living in an Apartment in my Sisters house. They are saving like mad to reduce their debt and build a down payment. The Irony for him is a Buddy of his started a business in the home care industry about the same time my Nephew went to grad school. His buddy now owns three group homes as well as his young family's home here in Metro Halifax.He works or doesn't when he wants.

I have not seen these Facebook groups of the newly tenured Boomers but may I ask if they have their sense of entitlement is related to their history of the early nineties. I bought my first house in 92 when Interest rates were 11.5%, Youth Unemployment 14% and regular Unemployment at 11.75%.
House prices of course were much more closely related to income and that is I think the literal disconnect with todays market. Asset prices have jumped but Incomes have not. Time seems to be the only answer from my perspective and for younger forumers I know that just sucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11692  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 8:48 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarbingerDe View Post
I understand that the optics of my post are "controversial". But I consider my frustration to be completely warranted.

Given that your name is "OldDartmouthMark" I'm going to go out on a limb and assume you own a home, have a decently rent-capped apartment, or otherwise we're able to benefit from the previous decades of affordable housing and rental options to secure financial stability.

I appreciate that you're here supporting development, and enjoy uncontroversial discussion of the aesthetics and shape of housing development in our city. It is a privilege and a luxury to view housing development through that lens. I do not have that luxury.

Every canceled or dramatically limited developed further erodes my chances (and the chances of everyone who didn't get into the housing market pre-pandemic because they were too young or for any other reason) of ever owning a home or even simply surviving comfortably without the constant threat of renoviction.

I have an engineering degree. I make $70,000/yr. Yet between paying off my student loans, and paying for the car (that I need to reliably commute to my job) I cannot afford to live in this city. Hell I can barely afford to split a 2-bedroom apartment in this city if I want to contribute to my savings.

The situation is dire and getting worse by the day, so forgive me for being frustrated with people who (in their ignorance) are dead set on either making me (and people worse off than me) homeless or financially crippled for the rest of our lives by these absurd rental/housing prices.

Also, it is not ageism; it is simply a fact. I can start providing links to the Facebook community groups behind this anti-development lobbying if youd really like... The demographics are quite consistent, and unsurprising.

Most people my age can barely afford to survive. They certainly do not have the time to lobby the government to prevent new housing developments. These anti-developmemt groups are overwhelming comprised of Boomer and older Gen-X homeowners. It's a simple fact whether you like it or not.
First of all, I'm not a fan of giving out personal info on the internet, but I will say my screen name was created way back when because I grew up in 'old Dartmouth'. In retrospect, I should have been more thoughtful when creating it as people always read "Old" and assume it is an indicator of one's age. Nobody cares, yeah I know. So please spare me the implication that you know what I'm all about and what I think - it's kind of silly to make such quick decisions to pigeonhole me in the 'enemy' camp, but I understand why you do. It's how society rolls now...

Let me say that I absolutely empathize. You, and everybody else trying to get into housing has the right to be absolutely furious with the housing predicament that has been created for you/us. It's completely unacceptable, and among other factors will continue to erode from the quality of life that you have the right to expect when living in Canada. I will now avoid the inevitable political conversation that would normally happen at this point.

The part that pisses me off about all of it is (A) the ignorance of those who have the entitled attitude and no empathy... the 'boomers' and 'gen X' that you speak of, and how it reflects upon what I perceive to be the majority of people in those age groups who actually do care and are equally pissed off about it (FWIW, do you think that millennials would be any more empathetic if the situation were reversed?), and (B) that this situation has created the mindset among many of the younger generations that somehow the older generations don't deserve to have the housing that they got into when the market was fair and reasonable, and that they should be brought down to suffer like everybody else. When... IMHO the real expectation should be that the younger generations have the same fair housing market that has been experienced for the past 100+ years in Canada. It has literally all gone to shit in less than a decade, but it should NOT, by any means, be accepted as the new normal. This was done to us, and steps need to be taken to fix it, and fix it fast.

All that said, I do wonder how effective these special interest groups are in actually changing decisions - my impression is that there is a lot of momentum going the other way and that the NIMBY groups are basically being ignored, but I'll accept that I could be wrong in this regard.

Lots more can be said, but I don't want to drag out the discussion. You have a right to feel the way you do, and I have a right to call out the typical generational nonsense that has become the normal state of internet discussions. It won't change anything, but I don't have to like it either, nor do you have to give a crap about what I like or what I don't. Beautiful, isn't it?

Anyhow, thanks for the discussion. I hope things change soon - a person in your position should be deciding whether you want a nice condo downtown or a McMansion in the suburbs... not whether you should have to choose between a small house in Enfield or a crappy 1-bedroom on the peninsula...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11693  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 9:06 PM
TheNovaScotian's Avatar
TheNovaScotian TheNovaScotian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 247
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
Ah yes... another installment of "us vs them" rhetoric on SSP. I was missing that as it seemed to have fallen off recently. All is right again.
Ah another installment of how can you be the victim, when I am.
If you felt this type of discourse has fallen off, it was really that people are exhausted from trying to explain obvious points ad nauseam. It's not that the situation has improved.

Instead of taking offence, have you thought to stop and listen to the chorus of people stating things are very bad and one particular group had a large part to play in all this. They have advanced educations and good jobs while still unable to own a home or are living precariously, shouldn't that be a warning sign that things are much worse than you personally feel?

The facts show one group has, through a mix of of policies profited greatly at the cost of the ones that follow. If that fact bothers you I don't really know what to tell you. There was a time and a place when rational voices were needed, that time sadly has passed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11694  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 9:25 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour View Post
Your post prompted me to check out the JRTA site for a progress update. The most recent update/news item is dated January 30, 2023. More than a year ago. Very discouraging. Oh, and they're looking to hire a summer student to assist in writing polices. There's obviously no urgency in dealing with our transportation issues. A complaint to the current govt. will result in a response such as 'we were elected to fix healthcare and that's our priority'. However, they do seem to be working hard on trying to eliminate my quarterly carbon rebate.
Yeah, this JRTA thing is pretty disappointing so far from what I've seen. They apparently hired consultants (HDR, WSP - based out of Toronto so not even local at all) but the only info I was able to get from them was them spending a bunch of time and resources on sketch model approaches to their decision-making but nothing concrete of a plan.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
It’s been more active than that; there was public engagement late last year, and an information session in February, and there’s more outreach/community events being held across the province this spring. The final plan is supposed to be announced in fall. Definitely agree though that they could be stepping on the gas more.
I asked them during their February session about their regional plan, existing HRM transit gaps, and if the two agencies are working together to create any kind of transportation demand management system and all I got was Lyle Lanley from the Simpsons ".....you there eating the paste! (next question)"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
I’ve interacted online with some people who are involved with the planning on the city side who are optimistic about what’s coming out of it, but I really don’t know how much stock to put in that. It’s all very floaty right now.
What did they say, do you remember any of it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11695  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 9:32 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 838
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNovaScotian View Post
Ah another installment of how can you be the victim, when I am.
If you felt this type of discourse has fallen off, it was really that people are exhausted from trying to explain obvious points ad nauseam. It's not that the situation has improved.

Instead of taking offence, have you thought to stop and listen to the chorus of people stating things are very bad and one particular group had a large part to play in all this. They have advanced educations and good jobs while still unable to own a home or are living precariously, shouldn't that be a warning sign that things are much worse than you personally feel?

The facts show one group has, through a mix of of policies profited greatly at the cost of the ones that follow. If that fact bothers you I don't really know what to tell you. There was a time and a place when rational voices were needed, that time sadly has passed.
At this point the writing is pretty much on the wall, for me at least. I have until maybe June to find a new job/career or I'll:
1) Literally be out on the street, forced to declare bankruptcy
2) Sell everything I own (minus my car and clothes) and go live with my retired parents in NS to avoid homelessness and stave off bankruptcy a couple extra months hopefully.

The job market is basically fucked at this point. I've had 2 options collapse in the past 3 weeks due to contracts drying up, hiring freezes, construction and building projects basically halting going forward. Barring some miracle I'd guess an undeniable recession/depression is coming sooner than you think, even with the government completely fudging CPI metrics to avoid riots.

FYI, I'm still out in Saskatchewan at the moment, where the CoL is actually cheaper than NS now and the economy isn't normally half as bad either (lower taxes too!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11696  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 9:43 PM
HarbingerDe HarbingerDe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
First of all, I'm not a fan of giving out personal info on the internet, but I will say my screen name was created way back when because I grew up in 'old Dartmouth'. In retrospect, I should have been more thoughtful when creating it as people always read "Old" and assume it is an indicator of one's age. Nobody cares, yeah I know. So please spare me the implication that you know what I'm all about and what I think - it's kind of silly to make such quick decisions to pigeonhole me in the 'enemy' camp, but I understand why you do. It's how society rolls now...

Let me say that I absolutely empathize. You, and everybody else trying to get into housing has the right to be absolutely furious with the housing predicament that has been created for you/us. It's completely unacceptable, and among other factors will continue to erode from the quality of life that you have the right to expect when living in Canada. I will now avoid the inevitable political conversation that would normally happen at this point.

The part that pisses me off about all of it is (A) the ignorance of those who have the entitled attitude and no empathy... the 'boomers' and 'gen X' that you speak of, and how it reflects upon what I perceive to be the majority of people in those age groups who actually do care and are equally pissed off about it (FWIW, do you think that millennials would be any more empathetic if the situation were reversed?), and (B) that this situation has created the mindset among many of the younger generations that somehow the older generations don't deserve to have the housing that they got into when the market was fair and reasonable, and that they should be brought down to suffer like everybody else. When... IMHO the real expectation should be that the younger generations have the same fair housing market that has been experienced for the past 100+ years in Canada. It has literally all gone to shit in less than a decade, but it should NOT, by any means, be accepted as the new normal. This was done to us, and steps need to be taken to fix it, and fix it fast.

All that said, I do wonder how effective these special interest groups are in actually changing decisions - my impression is that there is a lot of momentum going the other way and that the NIMBY groups are basically being ignored, but I'll accept that I could be wrong in this regard.

Lots more can be said, but I don't want to drag out the discussion. You have a right to feel the way you do, and I have a right to call out the typical generational nonsense that has become the normal state of internet discussions. It won't change anything, but I don't have to like it either, nor do you have to give a crap about what I like or what I don't. Beautiful, isn't it?

Anyhow, thanks for the discussion. I hope things change soon - a person in your position should be deciding whether you want a nice condo downtown or a McMansion in the suburbs... not whether you should have to choose between a small house in Enfield or a crappy 1-bedroom on the peninsula...
I appreciate your clarifications and expression of empathy. To provide some clarification of my own.

I never meant to imply that you are the enemy or that all "old" people are the enemy (you've also implied that you're not that old... so such a statement wouldn't have applied to you anyway).

I never said that I want everyone to be dragged down to the precarious situation I find myself in. I have some millennial friends who are a few years older than me who got into the market just in the nick of time; I'm glad they've attained the relative wealth and stability that provides.

Everyone deserves housing. What people don't deserve is the ability to gatekeep housing from the rest of society with their ignorant and selfish campaigns against development. It is irrelevant (at present) whether Millennials would behave the same way if the tables were turned. They're not in the position now, and NOW is what matters.

You acknowledge that the housing crisis is a problem that needs to be fixed, lest this become the new normal, the NIMBY's I'm criticizing are the champions of ensuring this is the new normal with their efforts to restrict the housing supply.

As a final note, and to further illustrate why I am so frustrated, even your lament about my options in the housing market is significantly out of touch.

To afford a 1-bedroom apartment ANYWHERE on the peninsula, I would probably need to sell my car. Given how miserable public transit is here; if I'm ever forced into such a scenario I might as well quit my engineering job, move back to New Brunswick, and live in my parent's basement... Given my loan payments and other expenses, I simply cannot afford to pay $1500 for housing (this is the floor for a 1-bedroom unless you get very lucky or find a rent-capped lease transfer).

I wish it were the case that I could buy a small house in Enfield. A quick perusal of Viewpoint or Royal LePage will show you that there are zero listings for less than about $340,000. These are all mobile homes, and they are all conditionally sold. The listings that aren't conditionally sold start at about $500,000, and most of the properties for sale in Enfield are new homes in the $600,000-$900,0000 range.

With $70k income, $40k of student debt, and a $40k down-payment I can get approved for a mortgage of $220,000!!! The TD pre-approval application was quick to inform me that there is not a single listing in the HRM for less than this amount...

So I truly wish the options were a crappy peninsula 1-bedroom or a small house in Enfield... But it's more like 1 roommate or 2 roommates.

Hence my frustration with the general state of things and my acute frustration with people who are fighting any attempt to change course.

Last edited by HarbingerDe; Apr 15, 2024 at 10:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11697  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2024, 10:00 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 838


This is the byproduct of an entirely fake economy predicated on debt-based usury and fractional-reserve banking. When our currency is basically made up and money is printed infinitely it causes rampant inflation. The BoC and GoC essentially doubled all that fake funny-money in a matter of 4 years so... things begin to hyperinflate (assets, groceries, fuel, housing, etc.) - the value labour is no longer attached to productivity, hence we no longer have a "productive economy" to speak of. When you outsource manufacturing and 100s of thousands of good union jobs in exchange for call centre jobs and government "social infrastructure jobs" you have a workforce that is entirely dependent on the whims of international finance and industry.

Then what do they do when they cannot squeeze more money in unproductive fashion? They outsource. Now there are few (if any) call centres in areas like Cape Breton and it's all running out of India. Then they can't outsource anymore? They insource cheap labour, i.e., TFWs, "students" (lmao), and all sorts of LMIA scams (you are here). Where does this end up? One charismatic leader with a funny looking moustache later and suddenly otherwise normal people freak out, burn books, and lynch "the others" out of sheer frustration and desperation.

It's quite alarming how few people here still don't understand it. They are oblivious to the consequences of the actions and rhetoric they've espoused and benefitted from for decades until it's too late. My own parents (god bless them) were those very same baby boomers until my father had his heart explode last summer and barely survived surgery. They both went from blissful ignorance and "bootstrapping" NDP voters to "why has everything I worked for become f***ked overnight and my 3 children (all with multiple degrees and important hard skills experience) barely able to survive on their own, let alone give us grandkids?"

You said you're an engineer making $70k which is highway robbery, but what else can you do? When I started my previous career (geomatics) in 2013 I made $80k per year over a decade ago. Now if I work that same entry position it's like $60-$65k TODAY which is about half the value adjusted for inflation, let alone housing increasing 300%-500% during that timeframe.

It's so over brother

Sorry for the blog post rant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11698  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2024, 4:20 AM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,352


My apologies guys. It sounds like things are even worse than I imagined.

I am envisioning an increase in firearms purchases among people who never considered owning one in the past, as things continue to come apart.

The optimist in me would hope that a change in federal government would start us on a better path, but at this point I'm not sure this is possible.

Best of luck.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11699  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2024, 4:21 AM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNovaScotian View Post
Ah another installment of how can you be the victim, when I am.
WTF?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11700  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2024, 11:21 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antigonish View Post
When our currency is basically made up and money is printed infinitely it causes rampant inflation. The BoC and GoC essentially doubled all that fake funny-money in a matter of 4 years so... things begin to hyperinflate (assets, groceries, fuel, housing, etc.) - the value labour is no longer attached to productivity, hence we no longer have a "productive economy" to speak of. When you outsource manufacturing and 100s of thousands of good union jobs in exchange for call centre jobs and government "social infrastructure jobs" you have a workforce that is entirely dependent on the whims of international finance and industry.
I bought my little house in the mid-'90s for a bit over $100K. I was making in the $70K range at the time and had saved enough over the years to be able to afford the minimum down payment. But I hadn't taken into account the costs of home ownership and when it was time to renew the mortgage a few years later I had to refinance in order to get rid of some of the consumer debt I accumulated from buying the place. Over the next few years though, I got better jobs and finally was making enough to be able to handle everything while still living a modest lifestyle.

Over time that continued and finally a few years ago I was able to be mortgage-free. My house had appreciated modestly over the years, probably 3%-5% a year based on assessed values, until the last few when those went nuts. A basically identical house across the street sold last year for $500K, a staggering number for it in my view. But bigger houses in the area go for even more now. Part of that was due to a post-covid influx of people from big cities who wanted to get away from that - there are examples of that in my neighborhood. Then we have the ill-advised govt fiscal policies you referenced and the flood of immigration from outside Canada hyper-stimulating home prices. Both of those are indirectly our own doing. Add to that the growth of the govt bureaucracy where you have those people, among the few whose salaries have kept pace with or outpaced inflation assuming they are still moving up the ladder, happily buying because their jobs are safe for life. I think we are not in a good place, but don't blame it on my generation alone. There are a lot of bad decisions by those in charge to blame for this, and increasingly those decisions are being made by younger, clueless generational members and those they elect.

On the issue of planning changes demanded by the Feds to get a tiny amount of federal cash, I think there is plenty of reason to be critical of that. In established single-family home neighborhoods like mine, a big part of the appeal is exactly that aspect - the relative lack of traffic, the quiet most of the time, and the feel of the area as a place where you can get away from the hustle and bustle part of the time. Now they want 7-storey apartment boxes adjacent or next door. In the right spots those would be fine, but not looming over peoples backyards in every SFH area, which is potentially what could happen. The amazing thing is that the much ballyhooed Centre Plan is essentially tossed out the window after a decade of work because the Feds are dangling a bag of gold in front of Council, which we know will just be pissed away on useless spending by HRM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.