HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14441  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:29 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,397
Should we read anything into this beside 99 King?

[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14442  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:39 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,067
I saw that too. My first thought is, no, we should read nothing into it. Perhaps S Market or Charlotte are sliding into the hole and they to be stabilized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14443  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:55 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
I saw that too. My first thought is, no, we should read nothing into it. Perhaps S Market or Charlotte are sliding into the hole and they to be stabilized.
IDK....This looks like it could be promising.
These guys do geotechnical drilling for preconstruction soil studies. (among other things)

https://www.crdrilling.com/exploration-geotechnical-environmental

Although I suppose it could be connected to the rebuild of Charlotte and not anything happening with the pit.

Last edited by sailor734; Feb 13, 2024 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14444  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 12:26 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
IDK....This looks like it could be promising.
These guys do geotechnical drilling for preconstruction soil studies. (among other things)

https://www.crdrilling.com/exploration-geotechnical-environmental

Although I suppose it could be connected to the rebuild of Charlotte and not anything happening with the pit.
But nothing is happening on Charlotte St that would require exploratory drilling. We are talking about bike lanes. Does anyone know if Percy’s hole is solid bedrock? Because if so, not sure why exploratory drilling would be required.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14445  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 2:45 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
But nothing is happening on Charlotte St that would require exploratory drilling. We are talking about bike lanes. Does anyone know if Percy’s hole is solid bedrock? Because if so, not sure why exploratory drilling would be required.
Charlotte St is being reconstructed from, IIRC, Union to Princess, including burying the few remaining power lines. Geotechnical seems a little much for that, but I refuse to believe in the Hole until something starts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14446  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 3:10 AM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,054
AllNewBrunswick has a new article published. They are reporting that AIM wants the court to let them restart their SJ operations
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14447  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 3:23 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
AllNewBrunswick has a new article published. They are reporting that AIM wants the court to let them restart their SJ operations
AIM says the province should have avoided media availability/announcements, the port should have been excluded, and that 'it was under control in 48 hours'. They also say IOL should have been shut down for the 2018 butane explosion (which IIRC was handled very well by Irving and SJ emergency services) if they're shut down for their two day long poison fire. Total garbage response. It's not reopening.

Buried interesting lede: AIM claims the port approached them in the weeks before the fire, urging a move, so 'another industrial tenant' could occupy the site. Port CEO Estabrooks says this conversation occurred.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14448  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 11:41 AM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
AllNewBrunswick has a new article published. They are reporting that AIM wants the court to let them restart their SJ operations
So, have they actually filled for a judicial review?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14449  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 11:45 AM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Charlotte St is being reconstructed from, IIRC, Union to Princess, including burying the few remaining power lines. Geotechnical seems a little much for that, but I refuse to believe in the Hole until something starts.

Could it perhaps have to do with determining the stability of the hole's wall abutting Charlotte? That might impact street reconstruction plans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14450  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 12:43 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
So, have they actually filled for a judicial review?
Applied for judicial review on Monday, yup. They would be fools not to, as much as I want the whole operation removed. That's a lot of money to do.

At this point IDK if Belledune or anywhere else would even want it. It went from being messy, loud, etc. to outright horrendous in the last 6 months.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14451  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 12:48 PM
CharlotteCountyLogan CharlotteCountyLogan is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
AIM says the province should have avoided media availability/announcements, the port should have been excluded, and that 'it was under control in 48 hours'. They also say IOL should have been shut down for the 2018 butane explosion (which IIRC was handled very well by Irving and SJ emergency services) if they're shut down for their two day long poison fire. Total garbage response. It's not reopening.

Buried interesting lede: AIM claims the port approached them in the weeks before the fire, urging a move, so 'another industrial tenant' could occupy the site. Port
CEO Estabrooks says this conversation occurred.
I am curious who the "another industrial tenant" would be? I'm guessing more cranes or maybe a Ro-Ro area for cars and machinery. Whatever it is I hope to never again see AIM operating on the waterfront. They had their chance and blew it. Make them leave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14452  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 1:27 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlotteCountyLogan View Post
I am curious who the "another industrial tenant" would be? I'm guessing more cranes or maybe a Ro-Ro area for cars and machinery. Whatever it is I hope to never again see AIM operating on the waterfront. They had their chance and blew it. Make them leave
Maybe the cold storage facility port and partners want
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14453  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 1:58 PM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
Maybe the cold storage facility port and partners want
Perhaps, but a video of the site development that circulated over a year ago clearly showed the area by AIM being where the roll-on-off site for the luxury car terminal would be. So, it is clearly in the port's plan to do something else with this space currently occupied by AIM. They just need to evict what is turning into a disgruntled and litigious tenant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14454  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 2:31 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
Perhaps, but a video of the site development that circulated over a year ago clearly showed the area by AIM being where the roll-on-off site for the luxury car terminal would be. So, it is clearly in the port's plan to do something else with this space currently occupied by AIM. They just need to evict what is turning into a disgruntled and litigious tenant.
I may be thinking of something else but isn't there a higher bar to get a court to overturn a ministerial decision? (limited and specific grounds I mean)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14455  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 4:26 PM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
I may be thinking of something else but isn't there a higher bar to get a court to overturn a ministerial decision? (limited and specific grounds I mean)
Got me. Not a lawyer...I just play one on TV. LOL

All I was saying is that if AIM is surprised that everyone in town wants them out and that the Port of Saint John might also be suggesting they leave, it is likely due to 1) Everyone in the city hates them, and 2) The port has bigger plans for that space.

Side note, I've met the owner of AIM several times --- many years ago. Let's just say he does not like being told what to do and is very much a law firm's best possible client, revenue-wise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14456  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 5:10 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
Got me. Not a lawyer...I just play one on TV. LOL

All I was saying is that if AIM is surprised that everyone in town wants them out and that the Port of Saint John might also be suggesting they leave, it is likely due to 1) Everyone in the city hates them, and 2) The port has bigger plans for that space.

Side note, I've met the owner of AIM several times --- many years ago. Let's just say he does not like being told what to do and is very much a law firm's best possible client, revenue-wise.
The point about AIM's owner's personality crossed my mind too. Port could try and evict them and he could say "I'm not going anywhere, I have a 20 year lease.....sue me! (and then it's in the courts for years )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14457  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 12:21 AM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,054
A nice development update from Councillor Gerry Lowe over on Facebook. Also he mentions that for future upcoming projects, city staff are working on the possibility of another 1500-2000 units that could be built over the next 2-4 years.

https://www.facebook.com/gerry.loweLibs2...v3tD9BhhegsrZn1jeDMBGEbMrj3zF4EKkEaC9wZl

Quote:
"Now that Christmas and the holidays are long gone and we are well into the year 2024, looking back I realize how fortunate I was, over Christmas to be involved with a couple of organizations who are committed to working with children and families of our city’s working poor. Knowing that Christmas dinners and gifts for the kids were provided made my Christmas meaningful.

Now on to other subjects: the much needed lights for Tin Can Beach are back ordered and will be installed as soon as they arrive. The quick story of Tin Can Beach- in 2013 or 2014, as a councillor, I asked Bill Edwards, who was in charge of paving etc with the city ,if he would put some pavement down by the Beach. He, along with local 18 ( outside workers) started to fix it up. 10 years later I invite you to drive down to enjoy it.

In regards to the 2 new schools- both North and South will be constructed with a community hub. Tenders were issued for the demolition of the North end school that stands there today. The South end situation- the case returns court April 12, regarding the house that is still occupied on St James Street.

On a much more positive note- St Vincent’s school( Cliff St) , St Patrick’s School ( City Line) have been purchased by a developer who also plans to build 226 units on the Loch Lomond Road. This has already been approved by Council. This is across the road from an additional 105 unit development which has already been approved by Council as well. As we work through the Year 2024, many new units are being constructed along with Affordable Housing in many of them.

Another new Developer , Michael Wowchuk, of Hospital Hill Development, has taken over the diocese building of the Cathedral on 1 Bayard Drive, it will contain 25 Senior apartments, 5 affordable units and 20 Market rents, 2 are 2 bedrooms and 23 are 1 bedrooms. On Tuesday I met with him on the site of the old General Hospital.

At the time, Fundy Engineering were digging holes to see what was buried there from the demolition of the hospital. He is looking at possibly building 2-6 story buildings, 54 units each or a larger 12 story one with 80+ units, along with a possible smaller building in phase two. I suggested to Michael to go higher and build smaller square footage units.

As I look around the Waterloo St Village, there is the construction of a new apartment building on Cliff Street which is well on its way. I believe this building will house 28 affordable housing units along with 28 market units. I believe Waterloo St. will also, eventually, have 2 more apartment buildings in the near future.

New construction is built and being built on University Avenue; 87 units on Technology Drive; Fundy Quay, Water Street, the beginning of a 79 unit apt building ; the old Aquarius yard with 55 Units, with the design of a second unit in back; Heatherway, which I believe, are on their 4th-24 unit apartment building; 461 Millidge Avenue, 30 unit apt buildind( well on its way); 166 Leinster St, 35 unit apt building; 52 Broad St, construction of a 39 unit apt building; 460 Milford Road, 78 units; 681 Dever Road, 54 units in 4 different buildings.

These are just some of the building that have either been approved or actually being worked on. Also, in the future for upcoming projects, city staff are working on the possibility of another 1500-2000 units that could be built over the next 2-4 years.

I also noticed that DP World ( the container people) have taken over the movement of potash on Broad Street for the next 5 years. This will definitely increase the potash coming from Saskatchewan.

These are just some of the examples of the more positive things taking place in the city. As we all know there are many problems, such as homelessness, the big hole at the head of King, train whistles, residential taxes and the lack of taxes from heavy industry and many more. Staff, Mayor and Council, and many committees created by Council are working on these daily. I do believe that 2024, and going into 2025 will be a good time for Saint John.

I plan to take a short holiday after Tuesday’s Council meeting ( Monday is a holiday) for 10 or 12 days. I will have my phone and I-pad with me and will be happy to take calls."

Last edited by DyAm00394; Feb 15, 2024 at 12:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14458  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 1:31 AM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,418
Quote:
On Tuesday I met with him on the site of the old General Hospital.
At the time, Fundy Engineering were digging holes to see what was buried there from the demolition of the hospital. He is looking at possibly building 2-6 story buildings, 54 units each or a larger 12 story one with 80+ units, along with a possible smaller building in phase two. I suggested to Michael to go higher and build smaller square footage units.
Twelve stories at the old general site would be a great addition to the skyline; the old general was quite impressive there in it's time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14459  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 3:05 AM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,054
I see AllNewBrunswick has a new article titled “SJ Airport Service Station, Hotel Plans Take Flight”. Anyone with access can let us know if anything new is said/mentioned in this article?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14460  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 11:24 AM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
I see AllNewBrunswick has a new article titled “SJ Airport Service Station, Hotel Plans Take Flight”. Anyone with access can let us know if anything new is said/mentioned in this article?
The whole thing seems pretty "pie in the sky" to me. There are already 2 gas stations/convenience stores beside the airport and as to demand for a airport hotel......given the passenger/flight numbers and distance from populated areas that would seem like an extremely dubious enterprise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.