Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno
|
So am I missing something, artificial turf isn't mentioned once in the article or in the program publications I've seen. Looking at the Phoenix program, I'm not even sure it's eligible / encouraged at all unless you're relying on "Landscape Materials" to do some heavy lifting.
One of the most basic requirements of the program requires 50% coverage by living plants from a drought tolerant list. Again, turf isn't included in that, and honestly, I don't see non-residential users in phoenix paying for turf where they don't have to when there are cheaper alternatives... maybe if you get near Biltmore or something that might crop up for aesthetic purposes.
But this can be done well, and I hope it extends to residential though auditing that program will be a nightmare. We ripped out our grass years ago and replaced it with drought resistant trees and general landscaping on our own and covered the rest of the area with gravel because I'm lazy and have never enjoyed yard maintenance. Today on the county aerials, maybe 10% of that gravel ever sees the light of the sun with the canopy coverage we have. And we haven't missed our grass for more than maybe 10 seconds in those years.
Two things I do with Phoenix would have done before this though... One, require commercial property owners to upkeep their approved site plans. Just because a plant dies shouldn't mean they're off the hook indefinately. And two, remove Palo Verdes from the list of approved trees. If you're looking for a long term canopy solution, those aren't the right selection. By all means use them as fast growing, drought resistant feature landscaping or a quick splash of green, but they shouldn't be doing work as 'trees' when even healthy installations aren't going to last more than 10-15 years.