HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 32 19.88%
Ballys at McCormick 9 5.59%
Hard Rock at One Central 13 8.07%
Rivers at The 78 86 53.42%
Rivers at McCormick 21 13.04%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1661  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 1:52 AM
joemits joemits is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 55
It's actually unbelievable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1662  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 2:06 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,760
Let's not doom just yet. There are two pending permits listed under the address 703 W Chicago Ave

1st:
Quote:
PARTIAL CAISSONS ONLY BELOW PROPOSED PARKING LEVELS AND PRIVATE ROADWAY FOR THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TEN (10) STORY EVENTS CENTER, FIVE (5) STORY CASINO WITH ANCILLARY FOOD AND BEVERAGE VENUES, AND A NEW 35-STORY, 500 KEY HOTEL. (CONST TYPE 1A; OCC GROUPS A,B,R,S)
https://webapps1.chicago.gov/buildingpermit/permitappstatus?apkey=3346405

2nd:
Quote:
DDS 2019 CBC: CAISSONS AND PILES ONLY PERMIT FOR THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 STORY BUILDING INCLUDING CASINO, HOTEL WITH 100 SLEEPING UNITS, AND EVENT CENTER. VERTICAL PENETRATION ONLY. (OCC GROUPS A-1. A-2, B, R-1, S-2; CONST TYPE I-B)
https://webapps1.chicago.gov/buildingpermit/permitappstatus?apkey=3360939
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1663  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 2:56 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,948
Those building permits are consistent if Bally's made the decision to scrap the hotel tower after October. 3 months of furious redesign and then submit a new application sometime in the past few weeks.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1664  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 8:26 PM
Mulan's Avatar
Mulan Mulan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 334
__________________
War is shit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1665  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 8:37 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 252
"Walmart on the River" is a perfect way to put the updated design
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1666  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 8:42 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,273
Honestly maybe best case scenario. A major VE job like this might be enough to get the riverfront project scrapped. A big gaudy casino run by a two-bit operator like Bally’s ruining what will be prime riverfront property in the coming decades is actually sad to consider, hotel tower or not. Let them put more resources into the Medinah casino (or sell to another casino operator)—a much more tasteful, urban prospective location for a permanent casino and a place that makes more sense for tourists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1667  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2024, 10:12 PM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 512
^completely agree. This site could have a nice hotel on it in the coming years with a fantastic pano view of our skyline, but it'll likely need to be taller than Bally's tower given the other proposals and overall momentum in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1668  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 12:18 AM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Handro View Post
Honestly maybe best case scenario. A major VE job like this might be enough to get the riverfront project scrapped. A big gaudy casino run by a two-bit operator like Bally’s ruining what will be prime riverfront property in the coming decades is actually sad to consider, hotel tower or not. Let them put more resources into the Medinah casino (or sell to another casino operator)—a much more tasteful, urban prospective location for a permanent casino and a place that makes more sense for tourists.
Not gonna happen. The city wants the bigger casino asap in order to boost tax revenues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1669  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 2:52 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,760
Bally's seeks big change to casino hotel due to 'unforeseen infrastructure issues'
Quote:
City water pipes below the Chicago Tribune's Freedom Center printing plant are forcing Bally's to find a new location for 400 hotel rooms at the casino and entertainment complex it intends to build on the site, raising questions as to whether the gambling giant will need to clear another public review process and why city officials didn't flag the problem before choosing Bally's to run Chicago's first casino.

Bally's said in a written statement that it has submitted an "alternate plan" to the city to relocate the hotel rooms elsewhere on the site along the North Branch of the Chicago River due to "unforeseen infrastructure issues" with its original, $1.7 billion plan. The 1 million-square-foot project approved by the city's planning department in May called for a 37-story, 500-room hotel to be built along the northern edge of the property at 777 W. Chicago Ave.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/commerci...n=20240117&utm_content=article1-readmore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1670  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 4:27 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,948
Lol
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1671  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 2:53 PM
2PRUROCKS!'s Avatar
2PRUROCKS! 2PRUROCKS! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 550
How did the city not catch this when reviewing the various proposals? The incompetence with this entire thing is stunning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1672  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 3:50 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 801
I’m just surprised how long this issue was kept under wraps
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1673  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 4:37 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,877
Could those red rectangles indicate the position foundations that would support a vertical expansion?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1674  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 6:08 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2PRUROCKS! View Post
How did the city not catch this when reviewing the various proposals? The incompetence with this entire thing is stunning.
You can say that again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1675  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2024, 7:00 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
I think that would be fine actually.

Agreed. Would be absolutely fine without any new construction casino project.
If this whole thing ends up unraveling, could be a blessing in disguise.

Though it would be hilarious to see them plop a low rent 2 story motel on top of their main building. Could put a big sign up advertising hot tubs, perhaps hourly rate options, HBO, A/C.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1676  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 6:59 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
The shuttles are free and secure, which is important for people walking in with money and (hoping to) walk out with a lot of money. From the standpoint of the casino operator, the shuttles make perfect sense so long as folks are riding them.

I think Lightfoot messed up by not choosing the other Bally's site, on the marshalling yards. Realistically that site will not be developed for generations, due to the high cost of building a platform and weak-to-mediocre demand for housing in Bronzeville. It would have a perfect nexus with McCormick Place and the growing hotel complex down there. I know the Bronzeville community didn't want it, but River West/River North community didn't want a casino on the Tribune site either. Lightfoot was gonna steamroll a community no matter what site was chosen.

And the Tribune site doesn't *need* a casino to get redeveloped. It's surrounded by hot neighborhoods, extremely close to downtown, etc.
Was there any good analysis of which location would bring in the most revenue?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1677  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 9:33 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Could those red rectangles indicate the position foundations that would support a vertical expansion?
No, that looks like mechanical screening for the many RTUs and other mechanical equipment the casino will need. You can see a corner of it in the lower left image.

It's highlighted in red because it is part of the curtainwall bid package - it is likely a metal panel system like the main casino walls.

The rest of the roof is supposed to be a green roof system, as shown in some older renderings.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1678  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 5:07 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 878
I've thought about this and if they scrap the parking garage that's supposed to go across from the casino building and replace it with the hotel tower... then I don't think it's that bad of a deal. Though that's probably not how it's going to happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1679  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2024, 9:07 PM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 362
Chicago to soon decide on Bally's revised plans for River West casino

Quote:
The city of Chicago intends to decide this month whether Bally's revised plans for its River West casino and entertainment complex are a go.

Why it matters: The company is changing course after the city determined its original plan for a hotel could damage water lines, sparking some to call for a deeper review and more community input.

Driving the news: Several city departments are reviewing drafts of revised renderings, which would relocate and resize a planned hotel from a 500-room tower to a three-story, 100-room building.

A Departments of Planning and Development (DPD) spokesperson tells Axios that 500 hotel rooms will still be built. The remaining 400 would be located near the casino at a site that's yet to be determined.
https://www.axios.com/local/chicago/2024/02/07/ballys-casino-plans-renderings

Updated Renders: https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/sites/chicago-casino/pdfs/240124_Chicago%20Update.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1680  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 12:52 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 252
Johnson administration gives green light to revised Bally's site plan

Quote:
“Today’s approval on relocating the 100-room hotel above the casino adheres to all city requirements, maintains the same floor area ratio we committed to when Chicago selected Bally’s as its partner, and keeps us on track to start construction on time of our world-class entertainment complex in River West this summer,” a Bally’s spokesperson said in a statement.

It wasn’t immediately clear where the additional 400 hotel rooms would be located.


Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.