Quote:
Originally Posted by freeshavocado
Wow, that's ugly. Thank you for the info!
Edit: Even though it's ugly, I'm always glad for more housing. Some of my favorite cities in the world--Mexico City, Taipei, Bangkok, Tokyo, Hanoi--have the most ugly housing, but they are so fun and vibrant. People are out and about on the streets. There are so many good shops and restaurants, events and festivals. I prefer a populated, vibrant city over an empty city with pristine architecture. Would be great if we could have both, but I'm firmly in the camp of build build build.
|
Comrade's point is accurate, this isn't vibrant at all. However, you're larger point is a good one. I was able to visit Quito, Ecuador earlier this year and I was impressed by the amount of restaurants and shops. Even in the outskirts of far flung suburbs you can still find walkable streets with all kinds of businesses. It seems like everybody is running a business out of their personal residence.
The other day, I was reading an article from Reason magazine that was published early this year about the favelas in Brazil and how Americans can learn lessons form them and based on what I saw in Ecuador, I think it's on point. Basically in some parts of south America they take ADUs to an extreme. They will buy a property and then build all kinds of auxiliary units onto it that they then rent out and or open a shop or restaurant (usually extra legally). This brings down housing costs and also makes the city more interesting.
I think it would be cool if we could come up with a regulatory framework here that allows for property owners to monetize and be creative with their property but also insures proper title and safe building standards (something that is lacking in South America).