HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2023, 11:53 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Oh dear.

The same people who are very concerned about the WEF using 5G George Soros Dominion Voting Machines to activate the Chinese Communist Bill Gates-approved mind-control technology in the COVID vaccines in order to make us all eat insects, have decided to become very concerned about "fifteen-minute cities".
Yeah, well it least it will (should) provide a red flag about anyone repeating the B.S....Below is a story in-case anyone is wondering what this is about: (Best I could find, seems the idiot deleted their tweet after they were called out on it)

https://edmonton.citynews.ca/2023/01/31/15-minute-city-conspiracy-theories/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2023, 4:09 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Five things that might excite you — really! — about Ottawa's zoning bylaw review
The city has released a series of discussion papers to get things started, and it's inviting the public to give them a read and share thoughts through online surveys

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
Published Mar 11, 2023 • Last updated 14 hours ago • 4 minute read


What’s in a zoning bylaw?

For starters, the rules that regulate how high that infill development down the street can be built, the number of parking spaces it requires and whether it’s to be exclusively residential or have some commercial space mixed in. It’s a kind of map dictating what can get built where without having to apply for an exception, and it’s about to be overhauled by the City of Ottawa for the first time in 15 years.

It’s the big planning project of this council term, carrying over from work of the last one. The new official plan, finalized by the province in November after approval by the previous council, sets out policies and directions to guide Ottawa’s development over the next quarter-century. It’s now time to build a zoning bylaw that matches it.

The target for approval by council is late 2025. Multiple versions of the new bylaw will be presented before then, including a first draft in early 2024. The city has released a series of discussion papers to get things started, and it’s inviting the public to give them a read and share thoughts through online surveys.

Still struggling to see why it’s worth perusing these pages? Here are five things that might pique your interest.

More bikes, and fewer parking spaces

Through the official plan, council gave a big thumbs-up to “sustainable transportation,” intensification and other priorities, which means rules regulating parking are going to get a rethink through this zoning bylaw review.

“Providing a range of affordable housing choices with adequate soft landscaping and room for trees will be prioritized over requiring parking spaces,” staff write. In areas close to public transit, staff are thinking about upward limits on the number of parking spaces allowed in new builds.

Support for cycling is also an area of focus, including the potential to require that developers include a minimum amount of bicycle parking outdoors for short-term use, more bike parking spaces for higher-density buildings and cyclist-friendly facilities like showers, lockers or change rooms in large developments.

Housing as a human right, more diverse neighbourhoods

In a discussion paper of the same title, staff describe the new zoning bylaw as a “generational opportunity to advance equity, diversity, and inclusion” and state explicitly that housing is a human right.

Historically, the zoning across much of Ottawa has restricted development to one detached house per lot. Among the results of this, the discussion paper states, are neighbourhoods where low-income, racialized and otherwise marginalized people can’t afford to live.

The paper also states that, while different people may have different priorities for housing, “there are simply not enough homes or enough variety to offer dignified, affordable choices to the residents of Ottawa.”

The city is expected to grow by 400,000 people over the next 25 years, staff write, and, in drafting the new zoning bylaw, “allowing for the construction of more housing will be considered the top priority.”

How to actually develop those 15-minute neighbourhoods

Supporting neighbourhoods where residents could walk in 15 minutes or less to most of the places they needed to access in a day was a major focus of the new official plan.

Actually making those neighbourhoods happen means the new edition of the zoning bylaw must be more flexible in the land uses it permits, staff write, “so that services and amenities can be established close to where people live.”

Part of that involves reflecting how scaled versions of traditional land use categories — commercial, institutional, sometimes even industrial — are included in the 15-minute neighbourhood ideal. The current zoning bylaw has already made a start on this, staff note, such as a special designation allowing “light industrial” operations like soap-makers and craft breweries to be located on main streets.

Getting creative to zone for trees

The city can’t use zoning to explicitly require the planting of trees, but council has made clear that it wants ways to better manage the growth and protection of Ottawa’s urban canopy. So what role could the new zoning bylaw play?

One option is expanding the current inside-the-greenbelt requirement for a “soft landscaped area” in residential front yards — also known as spaces trees could live — to apply to outside-the-greenbelt suburban development and also extending that requirement in some form to rear yards. The zoning bylaw could also try to do something not commonly seen in Ontario, though theoretically possible: dictate minimum soil volumes on a lot or in a yard.

“Every large tree in a neighbourhood was once a small tree that was given room to grow,” the discussion paper says.

Renewable energy and rural economic development

Those drawn to Ottawa’s expansive rural area could have an easier time starting businesses out of their houses or selling their wares at nearby farmers’ markets once the new zoning bylaw is in effect.

Among the rural-oriented ideas the city is considering are temporary-use provisions to allow farmers’ markets and other tourism-oriented events “in locations where impacts can be managed.” Staff will also be looking at current restrictions on home-based businesses, like limits on size and the allowed number of employees.

Staff are also preparing changes to the current zoning bylaw to regulate renewable energy generation facilities following a motion brought forward by two rural councillors to speed up this work. It’s expect to reflect decisions in the official plan about where these facilities — including solar, wind and bioenergy — can be located and “include provisions to address noise, vibration and other impacts associated with such facilities,” the discussion paper says.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...really-about-ottawas-zoning-bylaw-review

Last edited by J.OT13; Mar 13, 2023 at 12:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2023, 8:52 PM
YukonLlama YukonLlama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 155
All really great developments! Wish it could be implemented sooner than 2025
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2023, 9:27 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by YukonLlama View Post
All really great developments! Wish it could be implemented sooner than 2025
Agreed. Basically the bylaw will be ready 3 years after the OP is approved by the province. By which time all sorts of things could change and the original bylaw will be 17 years old.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2023, 1:04 PM
Dzingle Bells Dzingle Bells is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 158
i was excited for the discussion papers and accompanying surveys as it was the first real opportunity for input. that drained quickly though as the surveys are pretty useless. the questions are limited and biased. they dont allow for much commentary on the actual content of the discussion papers. hoping whatever is next allows for more feedback
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2023, 5:42 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
How Ontario's latest housing plan encourages sprawl
'We believe as a government that all of Ontario is a place to grow,' says housing minister Steve Clark

Mike Crawley · CBC News
Posted: Apr 07, 2023 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 10 hours ago


Premier Doug Ford's government says its new rules for land use in Ontario will increase the pace of housing construction, but a closer look at the proposed changes calls that claim into question.

The government's proposal would overhaul Ontario's two major policies for land-use planning: one applies to the Greater Golden Horseshoe, stretching from Peterborough to Barrie to Niagara, the other applies everywhere else.

The new set of land-use guidelines would apply across the province and is "housing-focused," says Steve Clark, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

"It would give municipalities more flexibility, reduce duplication, create more homes in urban and rural communities, support local economies and create jobs," Clark said in a news conference at Queen's Park Thursday afternoon.

Land-use policies matter for a host of reasons. They affect how much housing gets built in cities, they influence what purposes land can be used for and they dictate where industrial, commercial and housing developments should or should not go.

So when the government proposes fundamental changes, it's crucial to look at the fine print.

For instance, Ontario's existing plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe sets out minimum density targets for new development on unbuilt land. It says cities "will plan" for a minimum density target of at least 50 residents and jobs combined per hectare.

Under the previous Liberal government, the requirement called for at least 80 residents and/or jobs per hectare, an effort to force greater density on the suburban cities of the Greater Toronto Area.

The proposal released Thursday effectively scraps density targets for newly developed land altogether.

"Large and fast-growing municipalities are encouraged to plan for a minimum density target of 50 residents and jobs per gross hectare," says the proposed policy.

The change in wording is subtle, but important. It's hard to see how the provincial government can possibly enforce something that it merely "encourages" municipalities to do.

Eric Lombardi, part of the volunteer-run housing advocacy group More Neighbours Toronto, says the government's new plan won't put the kind of housing people want to buy in the places they want to be.

"Until we allow more housing to be built in the GTA in existing neighbourhoods, there's no way out of this housing crisis," said Lombardi in an interview. "Nothing I saw today addresses this core challenge."

The plan does maintain the government's push to boost density around major transit hubs such as subways, GO stations and light-rapid transit stops.

Yet it also allows cities to spread out housing developments further away from their cores. The proposal would make it easier for cities to expand their boundaries, which allows for development on the suburban fringes.

The Ford government forced boundary expansions on Ottawa and Hamilton last fall. The moves effectively paved the way for farmland to be turned into housing, making that land a lot more valuable, a big win for its owners.

The government's critics are united in their claims that the changes will do more to encourage sprawl than jolt the construction of new homes.

The changes would "kneecap housing supply efforts and unleash unprecedented sprawl," said the advocacy group Environmental Defence in a news release.

The group says the proposal would scrap an existing requirement that regions like Peel, York, Halton and Waterloo build at least half of new homes on land that already has municipal infrastructure.

Jessica Bell, the NDP's housing critic, says the moves will open up more farmland for development.

"What worries me is the Conservatives are going to continue down their trajectory of doubling down on suburban sprawl, which is incredibly expensive, and not doing the right thing, which is to really encourage the construction of homes in neighbourhoods people want to live in," Bell told a news conference at Queen's Park.

Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said in a statement that the proposed changes "are designed to open the floodgates to reckless, expensive sprawl while doing nothing to address the housing crisis."

Freeing up more land for development is a central part of the Ford government's action on housing, most controversially by exempting 15 parcels of land from Ontario's Greenbelt protection.

Yet it's far from clear that more land is what's really needed to boost the housing supply.

Municipalities across the province have already approved permits for developers to build 1.2 million homes that are yet to be constructed, according to a recent report from Ontario's regional planning commissioners.

Officially, the land-use proposals unveiled Thursday are not set in stone. The document is now posted for two months of public consultation. But because it's a policy document rather than a bill, Ford's cabinet has total control over its fate, and it doesn't have to go before the Legislature for a vote.

While Clark said he looked forward to hearing feedback on the proposed changes, he staunchly defended them during his news conference

"We're in a housing supply crisis," Clark said. "We believe as a government that all of Ontario is a place to grow no matter whether you live in the north, you live in eastern Ontario or southwestern Ontario."

As for watering down the density targets for newly developed land, Clark's spokesperson said in a statement that the changes "would give municipalities flexibility to plan for a range and mix of housing to meet local needs."

Clark said the government is "not backing down" on its promise to get 1.5 million new homes constructed over the 10-year period leading up to 2031.

Yet the government's own budget forecasts for new home construction over the next three years sit at roughly 80,000 per year. That's nowhere near the annual pace Ontario needs to hit its target.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/d...ario-land-use-planning-changes-1.6804894

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2023, 9:18 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,741
Yup. Seems the only goal was to benefit developers at the expense of the environment, heritage and what little power municipal politics had beforehand.

Had Ford and his Government actually cared about housing, they would have also restricted surface parking and exclusionary suburban big box centres, especially near transit. In fact, areas near transit should have been rezoned medium to high density throughout, ban surface parking outright. They would have embraced the 15 minute community. Can't have thatk because then it would require developers to make some changes as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2023, 6:08 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Here's how each Ontario city is doing on hitting provincial targets for building new homes
A year and a half into the Ford government's decade-long housing plan, most cities aren't even close to pace

Mike Crawley · CBC News · Posted: Jul 26, 2023 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: July 26


Nearly all cities in Ontario must dramatically pick up the pace if they hope to hit the targets set by Premier Doug Ford's government, the latest housing construction figures show.

A year and half ago, Ford's Progressive Conservatives set the goal of 1.5 million new homes to be built in Ontario over the course of a decade, and laid down specific housing targets for 29 of the province's largest and fastest-growing municipalities to hit by 2031.

Now trends are emerging, with some cities faring far better than others at being on track to achieve their benchmarks for getting new homes built.

Comparing Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. (CMHC) statistics on new home construction starts from January 2022 to June 2023 against the province's 10-year targets for each city provides a measure of how close each city is to its needed pace.

Among Ontario's largest cities, Toronto leads the way, with new home starts since January 2022 running at about 90 per cent of the pace needed to reach the goal of 285,000 new homes in 10 years. Vaughan has the next best score among big cities, at 84 per cent.

Most other large cities — including Ottawa, Hamilton, London, Kitchener and Markham — are proceeding at roughly 50 to 65 per cent of the target pace.

By contrast, Mississauga and Brampton, at 29 per cent and 23 per cent respectively, are so far behind that the two Peel Region cities will need to roughly quadruple the rate of new construction to get on track.

At the very bottom of the list: Burlington, which has seen just 208 housing starts in the past year and a half, roughly five per cent of what would be needed to hit its target of 2,900 new homes per year

Among smaller cities, Brantford, Pickering and Barrie are at the top of the list for housing starts relative to their provincial targets.

Economist Mike Moffatt of the Smart Prosperity Institute, a think tank based at the University of Ottawa, is tracking the pace of home building in Ontario. While Moffatt says municipalities' willingness to allow new construction has an impact, he also believes other factors — such as higher interest rates and shortages of construction labour — are restraining the number of new housing starts.

"I think all three orders of government along with the [housing development] sector need to start doing some deep dives, figuring out why these buildings aren't getting built, making the necessary changes and getting some shovels in the ground," Moffatt said in an interview.

CMHC figures show 44,002 new housing starts in Ontario from January to June of this year, an increase of nearly 10 per cent over the same period in 2022. There were 96,080 new housing units started in all of 2022, the first year of the Ford government's 10-year time frame for its home construction target.

To have any realistic hope of achieving the goal, Moffatt says Ontario needs to ramp up to an annual pace of 150,000 new housing units roughly by year four of the plan, which would be 2025.

"Every order of government needs to raise its game right now or we're not going to hit 1.5 million homes in 10 years," he said.

Private sector projections cited in the Ford government's 2023 budget forecast no more than 83,000 new housing starts in any year until 2026.

When the Ford government began laying the groundwork for its housing plan, the premier and his ministers laid much of the blame for the slow pace of home construction on city councils not approving projects quickly enough.

There's been pushback against that argument. Planners across Ontario estimate that developers have yet to start work on some 1.25 million housing units that are already approved for construction.

Tale of 2 cities: Barrie & Burlington

Developers' decisions could in part explain the vast differences in housing starts between Burlington and Barrie since January 2022. They are similar-sized cities, with similar 10-year-housing targets (29,000 for Burlington, and 23,000 for Barrie). Yet construction has begun on more than 3,000 new homes in Barrie since the beginning of last year, nearly 15 times as many as Burlington's 208.

Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward says the CMHC's housing start numbers don't tell the full story of development in her city.

"We can't force developers to put shovels in the ground," Meed Ward said in an interview. "I do think there are larger issues at play and I think it's unfortunate that municipalities were made the sole scapegoat."

Meed Ward says there are 29,000 housing units under review in Burlington, equivalent to the province's 10-year target for home construction in the city.

"Those are going to start coming online very quickly in the next few years ... .so we will meet our target by 2031 in terms of issuing those approvals," she said.

Burlington has fully approved building permits for thousands of housing units on which developers haven't started construction, Meed Ward said

In Barrie, Mayor Alex Nuttall credits city planning staff as a key reason for the pace of home construction.

"We try to make it as easy to get through the process as possible," Nuttall said in an interview at Barrie city hall.

"We've been working very hard focusing on approving units, on ensuring they get through all of the various stages of the planning process, getting the permits out the door to be able to start building."

Barrie's target is 23,000 new homes in a decade. Nuttall says the city has already approved more than 17,000 housing units and estimates it will hit its approval targets within the next two to three years.

"If anything, I think the provincial target for the city of Barrie is quite conservative," he said.

Like his counterpart in Burlington, Nuttall says Barrie also faces some situations where housing projects have been approved yet construction hasn't started.

A spokesperson for Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Steve Clark says while Ontario is making progress toward its housing goals, there is still more work to do.

"Tackling the housing supply crisis is a joint effort that takes all levels of government, including our municipal partners," said Clark's press secretary Victoria Podbielski in an email to CBC News.

"While we recognize that it will take time to increase housing starts to the rate Ontarians need and deserve, we also need all municipalities to use the tools at their disposal now to begin increasing their local housing starts without delay," Podbielski said.





https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-housing-construction-cities-report-card-1.6916180
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 4:19 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 860
So Ottawa hasn't been doing far better or more then the rest of the province....

Seriously, were on year 3 of a housing emergency, a high-rise in the CORE of this city just got processed down to 27 stories when it could & SHOULD have been higher. The cities new low-rise guidelines cares more about "community Character" then the goal of planning FOR homes. Its massive subsidized/affordable housing site is planned to be underbuilt & car centric for a large site in the city centre. And again our head of planning committee is trying to stop mid-rise/high-rises within MTSA's.

The only thing going for Ottawa planning is that the new ZB looks promising but poison pills are easy to add...

Oh, and the exurbs are absolutely booming with car-centric suburban sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 4:29 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange View Post
So Ottawa hasn't been doing far better or more then the rest of the province....

Seriously, were on year 3 of a housing emergency, a high-rise in the CORE of this city just got processed down to 27 stories when it could & SHOULD have been higher. The cities new low-rise guidelines cares more about "community Character" then the goal of planning FOR homes. Its massive subsidized/affordable housing site is planned to be underbuilt & car centric for a large site in the city centre. And again our head of planning committee is trying to stop mid-rise/high-rises within MTSA's.

The only thing going for Ottawa planning is that the new ZB looks promising but poison pills are easy to add...

Oh, and the exurbs are absolutely booming with car-centric suburban sprawl.
You are close to taking the 'Lead Ottawa Pessimist' Crown from me. Be careful as you assume this mantle. Dark dreams of charcoal brick precast panels lie in your future.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 12:51 PM
Tesladom Tesladom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
You are close to taking the 'Lead Ottawa Pessimist' Crown from me. Be careful as you assume this mantle. Dark dreams of charcoal brick precast panels lie in your future.
Grey concrete hallways that lead to nowhere!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 1:09 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,817
Taller projects are being rejected or cut near rapid transit stations (TOD)
Taller projects are not allowed anywhere in the CBD or nearby due to view planes
Taller projects are not allowed in the Byward Market because of its character
Taller projects are not allowed on most major streets (Wellington, Richmond, Bank) because of *main street character*
Taller projects are not allowed a couple of blocks away from said main streets due to low-rise neighbourhoods and fear of increased traffic or shadows
Taller projects are not allowed in the central part of the city near the farm due to... farming activities.

Would love to hear from the mayor and city council on where exactly larger, taller, slimmer projects are appropriate and would be approved in the nation's capital.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 1:26 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,835
Burlington is probably the biggest NIMBY city in Ontario - it's rich to see Meed Ward, who opposes basically every single development in the city, say that they have nothing to do with the anemic construction start rate there. The first thing she did as mayor was put a 2-year ban on new development in central Burlington, prohibiting even approved projects from proceeding to construction.

A project there which was approved in 2014 is only now starting construction as Meed-Ward forced them to not start construction for 2-3 years for literally no purpose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2023, 12:25 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Ontario to expand 'strong mayor' powers to smaller cities, launches $1.2B home-building incentive fund
Municipalities that meet housing targets can receive money from new fund to pay for infrastructure

Ryan Patrick Jones · CBC News
Posted: Aug 21, 2023 12:16 PM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


The Ontario government will extend so-called "strong mayor" powers to almost two dozen smaller cities and is launching a $1.2 billion fund to reward municipalities that meet provincially-mandated home-building targets, Premier Doug Ford said Monday.

Speaking at the annual conference of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, Ford said the measures will help towns and cities meet the province's goal of building 1.5 million homes by 2031 to address the housing shortage, affordability crisis and rapid population growth driven by immigration.

"This struggle is being felt most by young people and newcomers, who are priced out of the dream of home ownership," Ford told representatives of the province's 444 municipalities gathered in London, Ont.

"Failing to act would worsen the housing supply affordability crisis."

His remarks come just a week and a half after his government faced intense criticism over its handling of the decision to open up parts of the protected Greenbelt for housing, a decision for which Ford cited the same rationale.

A year and half ago, Ford's Progressive Conservatives laid down specific housing targets for 29 of the province's largest and fastest-growing municipalities to hit by 2031.

Ford announced Monday that targets had been assigned to 21 additional municipalities with populations projected to exceed 50,000 by 2031, including Aurora, Sarnia, Thunder Bay and Belleville.

If the heads of council for these 21 municipalities commit in writing to their targets by Oct. 15 of this year, they will receive strong mayor powers by the end of that month, according to a background document provided by the province.

Strong mayor powers include allowing mayors to propose housing-related bylaws and pass them with the support of one-third of councillors, as well as override council approval of certain bylaws and prepare their city's budget, instead of council.

These new powers were first granted to Toronto and Ottawa in December 2022. In June of this year, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark extended the powers to 26 other municipalities where councils signed on to the province's housing targets, including Oakville, Milton, London, Windsor, Hamilton and Niagara Falls.

Monday's announcement brings the total number of Ontario municipalities with access to strong mayor powers to 49. Newmarket was denied the powers despite being assigned a housing target because the town hasn't committed to achieving its target of 12,000 homes by 2031.

The powers, which effectively allow minority rule on issues of "provincial priorities," including housing, have been criticized by some as undemocratic.

Ford also said Monday that municipalities that show progress toward meeting their housing targets will become eligible for funding from a new three-year, $1.2-billion program called the "building faster fund."

Municipalities must reach 80 per cent of annual housing targets to access the funds, according to the province. Performance will be determined by comparing a municipality's number of housing starts and additional residential units created in a year against their annual target.

"These are incredible sums of money that will reward municipalities for building homes and help pay for important infrastructure and community building projects," Ford said.

The exact parameters for what the money could be spent on still needs to be worked out, Ford said, but the cash is intended to be used to pay for infrastructure to service the needs of new residents, including roads, water and sewer lines.

In his speech, Ford held up the cities of Vaughan and Pickering in the Greater Toronto Area as examples. According to the premier, those cities are on track to exceed their housing targets by 150 per cent and 140 percent, respectively, which would entitle Pickering to more than $5 million in new funding and Vaughan to more than $17 million.

Ten per cent of the money in the new fund will be reserved for small, rural and northern communities, Ford said, which have not yet been assigned a housing target by the province.

Municipalities have been raising concerns about a provincial law that cuts some of the fees developers pay, which the communities use to fund such infrastructure.

The More Homes Built Faster Act, which passed in November 2022, froze, reduced or exempted developers from paying fees municipalities charge them for some types of housing.

The Association of Municipalities of Ontario has warned the changes could leave municipalities short $5 billion and see taxpayers footing the bill — either in the form of higher property taxes or service cuts — and that nothing in the bill would guarantee improved housing affordability.

The province is currently auditing the finances of six municipalities to learn how their budgets will be affected by the law.

Ontario's Big City Mayors (OBCM), an organization made up of the mayors of 29 cities with populations greater than 100,000, welcomed the introduction of an infrastructure-focused funding program.

The organization said while cities are doing their best to issue building permits quickly, "We do not build homes."

"We ask the province to work with us to ensure targets are related to areas within municipal control, which are policies and permits," Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, who chairs the OBCM, said in a news release.

"We also look forward to further discussion to ensure all municipalities are kept whole for development charge credits for affordable housing."

Speaking just hours after Ford, Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles told the conference the new "temporary" fund isn't enough to replace permanent revenue municipalities lost with the passage of the act.

"It's more than a little backwards to effectively punish municipalities for not building housing when they don't have the funding or the provincial partner they need to do so," Stiles said, according to prepared remarks.

Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser agreed that the provincial funding won't have enough of an impact.

"I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I'm just saying it's way over-sold," Fraser said. "But that's the Ford government. That's Doug Ford. Lots of sizzle, not much steak."

With files from The Canadian Press

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-municipalities-association-meeting-1.6942488
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2023, 10:04 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Auditor general should review controversial land move in Ottawa, councillor says
Shawn Menard sees parallels between Greenbelt land swap in GTA and a 2022 urban boundary expansion in Ottawa

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Sep 13, 2023 2:38 PM EDT | Last Updated: 3 hours ago


Barely a week after Ontario's housing minister resigned in the fallout of a report into the Greenbelt land swap in the GTA, a city councillor wants the province's auditor general to look into another controversial land decision the same minister made in Ottawa.

Former municipal affairs and housing minister Steve Clark left his post after Ontario's auditor general found he failed to oversee a "rushed and flawed process" that led to Greenbelt lands in the Toronto and Hamilton area being selected for housing development.

The auditor general's report found the land swaps benefited certain developers. Capital Ward Coun. Shawn Menard sees parallels with Clark's 2022 decision to expand Ottawa's urban boundary by 654 hectares, overriding a previous city decision and concerns development there would be costly for taxpayers.

"They need to investigate in the City of Ottawa," Menard told reporters after a city council meeting Wednesday. "Not just Hamilton, not just Toronto, but the City of Ottawa as well, given the expense to our residents."

He's planning to move a motion at the next council meeting asking the province's auditor general and integrity commissioner to "consider reviewing the provincial government's decision to add urban boundary expansion lands to Ottawa and for the province to reverse this costly decision."

His motion references "local media reporting" that, in his words, revealed that "developer-connected donors to the Progressive Conservative Party" bought some of those lands shortly before Clark's decision.

CBC reporting last year found that a company tied to five Progressive Conservative Party donors bought an east-end farm on those lands shortly before Clark's decision.

"There's concerns there in light of what the integrity commissioner and the auditor general have found in Ontario, which is that they inappropriately added lands, that there was influence that shouldn't have been there by these developer-connected donors as well as lobbyists," said Menard.

"Ottawa was affected by that as well, in my view, given the expansion."

Speaking to reporters after Wednesday's council meeting, Mayor Mark Sutcliffe didn't show much enthusiasm for Menard's motion. In his view, the provincial auditor general's office can make its own decision without any input from council.

"I'm not interested in revisiting past decisions. I'm interested in building more homes for the residents of Ottawa and for future residents of Ottawa. If the Ontario auditor general sees a reason to look into that then they'll do so. They can do that at their own accord," Sutcliffe said.

"That's how the Ontario auditor general functions, not at the direction of Ottawa City Council."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/au...move-in-ottawa-councillor-says-1.6965529
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2023, 9:33 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Council asks new housing minister to review urban boundary expansion
Former housing minister Steve Clark increased Ottawa's by 654 hectares

Trevor Pritchard · CBC News
Posted: Sep 27, 2023 5:22 PM EDT | Last Updated: 11 minutes ago


Ontario's new minister of municipal affairs and housing is being asked to review a controversial expansion of Ottawa's urban boundary carried out under his predecessor's watch.

City council unanimously carried a motion Wednesday asking Paul Calandra to look into the expansion approved last fall by former housing minister Steve Clark, who overrode the city's initial plan and added hundreds of hectares in a bid — as his press secretary said at the time — to allow "desperately needed housing to be built."

The request comes several weeks after scathing reports from the province's integrity commissioner and auditor general into how Clark's office handled a massive land swap in southern Ontario's Greenbelt.

They suggested some private developers improperly benefited from the process and led Clark, the MPP for Leeds–Grenville–Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes, to resign from Premier Doug Ford's cabinet.

"I don't buy the argument that we need to trample over wetlands and prime agricultural land and farmland just to meet those single-unit home targets," said Capital Coun. Shawn Menard, who introduced the motion, in an interview with CBC Radio's Ottawa Morning.

"There's plenty of land within the city of Ottawa to intensify."

The urban boundary sets the geographical limit for how far a city can grow. In November 2022, Clark used his powers to expand Ottawa's by 654 hectares, including agricultural lands city staff had previously chosen to leave out.

That decision superseded the expansion council approved in 2020, increasing it by roughly 50 per cent.

Then-mayor Jim Watson was critical, calling Clark's override "paternalistic" and arguing it would be expensive for taxpayers and cause urban sprawl.

It came amidst a push by the Ford government to aggressively boost housing supply, with Ottawa having a target of adding 151,000 new homes in a decade, double the city's own projections.

Menard said one particular property — a former farm on Watters Road in Orléans — was of particular concern.

That farm was not among the properties originally approved by the city, largely because it sits on prime agricultural land. In August 2021, it was purchased by a group whose five directors had donated north of $12,000 to the PCs in 2021 and 2022.

Menard singled the farm out in a letter signed by himself and 10 other councillors, calling for the auditor general and the integrity commissioner to look into the "lack of transparency and accountability" around the expansion.

"Given what we know happened with the Greenbelt, we want to make sure that the same thing didn't happen here," he told Ottawa Morning.

"[Though] quite frankly, it appears it did happen here."

While Ottawa's situation is "quite different" than the Greenbelt controversy, Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said he was cognizant that concerns had been raised about some land parcels.

"I'm not a fan of petitioning other levels of government and expressing our opinion, but this is about our official plan. We need to work collaboratively with the provincial government," Sutcliffe said after Wednesday's council meeting.

"I have a strong working relationship with the provincial government, so it's simply a request to ask them to have another look. And if there's anything that needs to be reviewed, they can do so."

Menard's initial motion suggested going straight to the auditor general and the integrity commissioner, and he explained after the council meeting why the language had changed.

"There's a new minister in place," he said. "So we're going to give them the benefit of the doubt."

With files from Elyse Skura and CBC Radio's Ottawa Morning

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/shawn-menard-letter-council-urban-boundary-ottawa-1.6979785
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2023, 1:16 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Greenbelt 2.0? Why Doug Ford's boundary changes in Ottawa and Hamilton could make developers rich
Premier Doug Ford's government added more parcels of land to each city than councils recommended

Mike Crawley · CBC News
Posted: Oct 03, 2023 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


On the same Friday afternoon last November that Premier Doug Ford's government announced its plan to take certain developers' land out of the Greenbelt, it also made moves that benefited developers who own rural land on the outskirts of Ottawa and Hamilton.

It did so by expanding each city's boundaries, instantly turning certain parcels of agricultural land from rural to urban, opening them up to future housing development and sharply increasing their potential value.

Opposition parties believe these moves have strong parallels with what Ford's government did in selecting 15 parcels of Greenbelt land for housing development, potentially boosting their value by $8.3 billion, until ultimately reversing course last month.

That's prompting calls for investigations into the Hamilton and Ottawa boundary changes, focused on why certain land parcels were picked despite objections from each city council.

"We see some connections … and we want to get to the bottom of it," said NDP Leader Marit Stiles.

Stiles says some of the same developers who stood to benefit from the Greenbelt removals still stand to benefit from the government's expansions of urban boundaries.

"What we suspect has happened here is the system has been rigged by the Conservatives to give certain land speculators preferential treatment on these particular pieces of land," Stiles said in an interview.

Stiles wrote to Ontario's auditor general's office on Friday to request an investigation into the government's expansions of urban boundaries in Ottawa and Hamilton, as well as its changes to other official land-use plans, such as Waterloo, Niagara and York regions.

Revelations from the auditor's August report into how the government selected Greenbelt properties for housing development helped trigger a cascade of resignations and, ultimately, Ford's late September announcement that he's scrapping the plan.

The auditor estimated that the Greenbelt removals boosted the value of previously agricultural land by a factor of at least 10 times.

Both Ottawa and Hamilton city councils want the government to reconsider the boundary changes, and so far the government is refusing.

"The province follows a standard official plan review and amendment process that is open to the public and which has the goal of ensuring municipalities are properly prepared to accommodate growth," Alexandru Cioban, a spokesperson for Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Paul Calandra, said in an email to CBC News.

"The province has and will continue to take decisive action that ensures municipalities are properly prepared to meet their housing targets and build the homes their residents need," Cioban said.

The government's expansions to Hamilton's and Ottawa's boundaries went against what the two city councils wanted, adding hundreds of more hectares to each city despite concerns that it would encourage sprawl.

The most controversial property captured by the province's expansion of Ottawa's boundaries is prime agricultural land on Watters Road in Orléans, more than 20 kilometres from the city centre.
  • In February 2021, Ottawa city council explicitly excluded that 37-hectare farm when it voted on its own plans to enlarge the city's urban boundaries.
  • In August 2021, a newly incorporated company called 1177 Watters Developments Ltd. bought the farm for $12.7 million.
  • In November 2022, the Ford government made the land part of the City of Ottawa with the stroke of a pen.

The company's five directors donated more than $12,000 to the Ontario PC Party in 2021 and 2022, CBC Ottawa's Kate Porter revealed last November.

"You've got a group of people who buy a piece of land in 2021", said Fraser. "This is land that you're probably never going to build on, because it's zoned agricultural. And then all of a sudden this piece of land, totally inappropriate, appears [within the urban boundary] and then the value of that land triples."

"That's worthy of a second look," Fraser told reporters at Queen's Park. "I think reasonable people will go, 'That just doesn't smell right.'"

Last week, Ottawa city council formally requested that Calandra review the boundary expansion.

In Hamilton, the province ordered the city last November to add 2,200 hectares, despite council's previous vote in favour of maintaining existing boundaries.

Among the properties that were wrapped into Hamilton's new boundaries: land owned by some of the same people whose holdings were among the 15 parcels removed from the Greenbelt last November.

As previously reported by CBC Hamilton's Samantha Beattie, the land added to Hamilton's urban boundaries includes properties owned in part by developers Sergio Manchia of UrbanCore Developments and Paul Paletta of Alinea Group Holdings, formerly Penta Properties.

According to the Ontario integrity commissioner's report into the Greenbelt, the two developers used the same representative to make their requests both for Greenbelt removals and for changes to Hamilton's official plan. The urban boundary changes were part of the government's amendments to that official plan.

The integrity commissioner's report says the representative, Matt Johnston (along with lobbyist Peter Van Loan), met with two of then-minister Steve Clark's senior staff members in October 2022.

"We were presented with the changes the minister was considering making to the Hamilton Official Plan and asked to verify our comfort level with them," Johnston told the integrity commissioner.

Johnston says the meeting was to review the merit of submissions he had filed on Hamilton's official plan.

"None of them had anything to do with the approved urban boundary expansion areas," Johnston said Monday in an email to CBC News.

"I had no role whatsoever in influencing the province's decision," he said, adding that he is a registered professional planner, not a lobbyist.

Hamilton council's view was that there was no need to expand boundaries because sufficient new housing could be built by increasing density within the existing city limits, and because extending municipal services such as water and sewerage further from the core would be costly.

After Ford reversed course on the Greenbelt last month, Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath called for a similar reversal.

But the word from the municipal affairs and housing minister's office is no.

"This decision will not be revisited," Calandra's director of issues management, Chris Poulos, told CBC Hamilton on Sept. 22, the day after Ford apologized for breaking his promise not to touch the Greenbelt and announced his reversal.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-ottawa-hamilton-urban-boundaries-greenbelt-1.6984470
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #818  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2023, 9:13 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 860
Make Housing Affordable Petition for Legalization of Multiplexes

https://makehousingaffordable.ca/legalize-multiplexes-in-ottawa/

If this is not allowed just delete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #819  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2023, 2:42 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,553
Council split on fourplexes as feds press cities to relax zoning
Mayor met with housing minister last month and says Ottawa's plan should satisfy feds

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Oct 14, 2023 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 8 hours ago


Sean Fraser, Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities, prepares to speak during a housing announcement outside a rental housing building being developed by the University of British Columbia Properties Trust, in Vancouver.

Ottawa is preparing to loosen rules to allow taller and denser housing as it drafts a new zoning bylaw, but some are asking whether the city should go even further to ensure it doesn't lose out on its share of $4 billion in federal funding.

Mayor Mark Sutcliffe met with federal Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Sean Fraser late last month to discuss, at least in part, the city's application for money under the Housing Accelerator Fund.

Fraser has been playing hardball on housing across the country. He sent letters to cities like Halifax and Mississauga, Ont., asking them to raise height limits to four storeys in central areas or near transit stations and allow four units on every lot in exchange for the money.

Sutcliffe said Ottawa is already working on new zoning rules that should satisfy Fraser. He said both want the same thing: more housing.

"We are working on a plan that I think will go well beyond what the federal government expects from us in terms of the density that we will achieve across the city," he said.

"They'll see that we are moving in the direction they want us to and that it's consistent with their plans, and then we can move forward with the funding application."

Asked whether Fraser signalled Ottawa's plan would be enough, Sutcliffe said "we're still talking about that."

The city is expecting more than $150 million from the federal fund to pay for a plan to add nearly 7,000 housing units. But it's still waiting for an answer to its application, and some councillors aren't comfortable taking any risks with that money.

Somerset Coun. Ariel Troster noted that Fraser has pushed other cities to allow up to four units per lot, not the three units council recently approved to comply with the province's More Homes Built Faster Act. She asked city staff why Ottawa isn't simply moving forward with four units as it drafts a new zoning bylaw.

"I'll just register my concern, because this is a request that's being made very strongly," she said at a planning and housing committee meeting last week.

"I would hope that, should the government make that request, that we would move quickly, understanding that a lot of money's on the line for the city that's really important to us."

The minister's office said it's illegal in many cities to build the sort of housing needed to end the housing crisis, with Fraser's team hoping cities all over the country will "increase their ambition."

"In London, Halifax, Hamilton and Vaughan, we have had agreements struck where those cities were willing to move to legalize four units as-of-right," an emailed statement reads, "and left no stone unturned to clear up by-laws that they had on the books which were blocking building.

"If cities are able to effectively justify why they would not be able to implement measures we have put forward, Minister Fraser is open to considering locally made solutions that will go above and beyond the requests made by the Minister and achieve the desired objectives."

The new zoning bylaw is expected in March to replace a complicated hodgepodge of regulations built on a foundation that precedes amalgamation.

Planning and housing committee chair Jeff Leiper said it will mean a "very significant change" on densities allowed across the city, and includes measures that are already likely to attract opposition.

He said it will be more nuanced than across-the-board permission for four-storey fourplexes, which he called "arbitrary." But he thinks it will achieve the same results in the end.

"We're confident that we're going to achieve the densities that the federal government is looking for in a way that is well thought through and comprehensive and holistic," he said.

The city's zoning bylaw is required to conform to the latest official plan, which already foresees highrises around transit stations and increased density along major corridors.

Leiper said it will also allow taller housing in some low-rise neighbourhoods, raising limits currently set at two storeys to two-and-a-half or three, depending on building form. He thinks that will be enough of a political challenge.

"That's going to be significantly opposed by many Ottawa residents," he said. "That will be a key flashpoint. A bigger flashpoint than the number of units."

There's signs the federal government might be flexible on height requests, since it eventually approved Halifax's application even without the four-storey change Fraser initially requested.

In Leiper's view, Ottawa's new three-unit-per-lot policy is also likely to satisfy the federal government, especially since it applies to semi-detached and row houses that could each be split into three separate dwellings.

"For a majority of the city, the changes that we've accomplished mean that there could be as many as six units," he said.

Councillors seem divided on whether Ottawa should move to an across-the-board four-unit limit, with or without a federal ultimatum. The fault lines run partly along the greenbelt.

"I think it's a fantastic idea," said Rideau-Vanier Coun. Stéphanie Plante when she heard about Troster's comments at planning committee.

In Plante's view, raising height limits to four storeys would also make sense in wider swaths of the city. She said the need for new housing is urgent.

"Obviously I have a different perspective," she said. "I'm a downtown councillor. We had intensification here already. I am eager as well for other parts of the city to have intensification.… It's getting packed in here for sure."

A bit further out, in the inner suburbs, Knoxdale-Merivale Coun. Sean Devine seemed amenable to a four-unit policy.

"We've already approved three units per lot. Four is not a big leap," he said in an email. "We should do all that we can to meet our growth targets, and we should do it in a way that creates denser, more livable, more affordable communities."

Outside the greenbelt, councillors agreed on the urgency of the housing crisis, but worried that infrastructure might not be able to keep pace with a rapid increase in density.

Orléans East-Cumberland Coun. Matt Luloff said four units per lot wouldn't work in his ward. He partly blamed the federal government. He asked how it can push for more density when its own agency — the National Capital Commission — is holding up the city's preferred option for a desperately needed third roadway through the greenbelt in the east end.

"You can't in one breath say we want more density and, in the other, block every effort for us to improve our transportation corridors," Luloff said.

Kanata South Coun. Allan Hubley said he's not against the idea of four units in principle, but worries the transit system isn't yet up to supporting those kinds of densities in the suburbs. In his view, even three units isn't sustainable without proper transit, since it risks turning backyards into parking lots.

He said the feds are "dangling what they call easy money."

"This is not easy money," said Hubley.

Stittsville Coun. Glen Gower said the city's goal is to update zoning and other policies to spur housing growth, but four units per lot isn't the only solution.

He hopes the federal government isn't applying a "cookie cutter approach" and takes a close look at Ottawa's plan.

With files from Sophie Kuijper-Dickson

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/co...s-press-cities-to-relax-zoning-1.6995894
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #820  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2023, 2:36 PM
Athens Athens is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
[B]Council split on fourplexes as feds press cities to relax zoning


Orléans East-Cumberland Coun. Matt Luloff said four units per lot wouldn't work in his ward. He partly blamed the federal government. He asked how it can push for more density when its own agency — the National Capital Commission — is holding up the city's preferred option for a desperately needed third roadway through the greenbelt in the east end.

"You can't in one breath say we want more density and, in the other, block every effort for us to improve our transportation corridors," Luloff said.
Luloff seems to think that a transportation corridor is a roadway. As a commuter along the Innes-Navan-Brian Coburn route, the pain is real, but that is only because there are no viable bus routes for a lot of these commuters. Most of the peak hour routes take rinky dink routes through various developments, and “frequent” routes along Brian coburn end up going all the way down to the 174. This city needs to re-consider building the Brian Coburn extension as a busway only as a concession to the NCC, or consider the option of adding lanes to the bypass. This fight with the NCC will go on for years and we will pay for it. Also, Orleans technically has 3 routes out of it, or 4 if you count Renaud-Anderson for folks trying to get to Hunt Club.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:08 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.