Quote:
Originally Posted by freeshavocado
Fascinating. I wonder why SLC lags so much in under-construction and proposed towers. I also wonder what the figures are for other similar cities like Milwaukee and Sacramento.
|
Here are some other city comparisons (Milwaukee, Columbus, Kansas City, San Antonio, Sacramento):
Towers over 600 feet:
Milwaukee 1
Columbus 1
Kansas City 1
Towers 500-600 feet:
Milwaukee 2
Columbus 4
Kansas City 2
San Antonio 1
Towers 400-500 feet:
Milwaukee 3
Columbus 5
Kansas City 6
San Antonio 4
Sacramento 2
SLC 2
Towers 300-400 feet:
Milwaukee 8
Columbus 8
Kansas City 6
San Antonio 10
Sacramento 10
SLC 12
Towers 200-300 feet:
Milwaukee 41
Columbus 17
Kansas City 29
San Antonio 17
Sacramento 7
SLC 12
Under construction:
Milwaukee 2 (tallest 537)
Columbus 2 (tallest 411)
Kansas City (no info on wiki i can find)
San Antonio 2 (tallest 388)
Sacramento 1 (330)
SLC 2 (tallest 449)
Approved:
Milwaukee 3 (tallest 277)
Columbus 0
Kansas City (N/A)
San Antonio 5 (tallest 351)
Sacramento (Unsure.. see proposed)
SLC 0
Proposed:
Milwaukee 5 (tallest 390)
Columbus 2 (tallest 19 stories)
Kansas City (N/A)
San Antonio 3 (tallest 324)
Sacramento 8 (unsure how many are approved. Tallest 557)
SLC 7 (tallest 392)