Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12
It's pretty pathetic that this is the normal timeline of things. Carry on...
|
At least they appear to be moving forward. I assume the repair garage is still operating, so it's rent will probably help cover the developer's costs of holding the site.
In the meantime the project has had a significant redesign by a new architect (I don't agree with GenWhy that it's a mild re-do). They've added 3 units and a bit of density, chopped a floor off the top but added 19 more parking spaces, altered the appearance of the building with floating boxes off a core, rather than stacked boxes, and changed the materials.
In the wider context the pro forma will have changed because, as well as the design changes, construction costs will be higher, the costs for construction financing will be more, and presumably the potential rent income should be greater too. The developer must be looking to committing north of $60m for construction, although there shouldn't be too horrendous a risk associated with that. It's not surprising that it's taken a while.