Quote:
Originally Posted by LAsam
Would Lendlease just assume the in-place loans at that point, with the only security on those loans being the real estate?
|
There would need to be a workout where the parties (or the courts!) come to a solution together. But as it is now, Lendlease would have liens that are senior to the lenders - in a way you could think of that as Lendlease being a "lender" to the lender.
As the value of the property decreases, stakeholders get their interest wiped out in order of seniority. For example, first the equity holders would lose their interest, then the preferred equity (if any), then the mez lenders, then the lender, and then the construction lien-holders would be the last ones standing. For that reason, theoretically Lendlease could end up owning the parcel outright (with no loans), but there's too much value there for that to happen. The most likely path is that this gets sold or auctioned off to someone and whatever price is received pays back the stakeholders in line of seniority (again, Lendlease and the other construction lien holders first, then the lender, etc.). Lendlease could end up controlling this by getting involved in that process - they have more information than anyone else about the state of the project, they have a financial stake in it already, so it really would come down to whether or not they want to take over the project and whether they're willing to pay as much as the other bidders.