Halifax Transit

[swimmer_spe]

Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark

So we can spend less money to build a more robust bridge to modern standards, including any configuration that might suit future needs? And this will be less intrusive?

It needs to be replaced.

The problem is, it will not be built for the future, but for yesterday. Built for the future would mean at least4 lanes per side, with 1 additional lane each side for transit/LRT. Most likely,it will only be 3 lanes aside.

Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark

So protesting the cutting down of trees to facilitate an infrastructure poject means it's not acting like a city? Wow... then Toronto needs to stop acting like a small town...


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/metrolinx-trees-osgoode-hall-1.6660875

Historic property vs side of the road on non historic property. I would never suggest that historic properties be ripped up. Besides, Halifax already did that with Africville.