HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


270 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:14 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,096
Please finesse away Norman.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:18 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,096
I am rooting for the No-action version.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 10:41 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
I am rooting for the No-action version.
That's not gonna happen. It was already determined that the enclosure of the open space would have no adverse impact. But they could end up with a tower of similar height anyway, depending on where they go with the extra air rights.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 9:26 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterQM View Post
Here are a few more Google Earth shots added to the story. This thing will be massive and probably taller once Foster finesses all this bulk. Shown is just a bit more than 1,400 feet btw.
I don’t think that there will be any finessing. I’m pretty sure that these are essentially the final product.

Both versions look better than 50 HY.

Last edited by JMKeynes; Nov 13, 2018 at 9:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 12:52 AM
Prezrezc Prezrezc is offline
A.F.K.A. JayPro
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 851
To give you an idea here:

271P is most likely next to go; so we're looking at something as big as JPM.

The only thing about 245P that could save it is the fact that it was the last of the trio to rise (comp. 1967). Soby virtue of the date, any repurposing/retrofitting would porlly work best here.

Besides, the facade at least has a uniqueness to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 1:31 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,939
__________________
hmmm....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 2:00 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
What an amazing city!!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 2:56 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,294
I’ll just quote this from the city realty article that I found interesting:

Quote:
In a statement, Foster said, “The building design is set to respond to its historic location as well as the heritage of JP Morgan, and we look forward to working with them to realise their vision for a new global headquarters for the company.”
Surely I hope its not soul crushing like other JP towers (Chase tower in Houston or 383 Madison Avenue).

But something that has qualities of some of the historical Park Ave structures would be nice.

I kinda wish Robert A.M. Stern designed this. But we shall see what Foster provides.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 3:17 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
... But we shall see what Foster provides.
I seriously believe that we have seen the two designs. Either of those (and likely, the 1,400' version) will rise. I'm happy with either. They're nicer than 50 HY, not as fat, and much taller. Foster is a hack, but these will be great towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:20 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I seriously believe that we have seen the two designs. Either of those (and likely, the 1,400' version) will rise. I'm happy with either. They're nicer than 50 HY, not as fat, and much taller. Foster is a hack, but these will be great towers.
What we have seen is the massing for the tower. The main details of course are what will make the design, but we've seen the basic outline. The only question is the ultimate height. It will be a bulky, massive office tower. But it doesn't overwhelm Vandy too much, and I think they will work well together.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 4:48 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetscaper View Post
Jesus, is it really gonna be this fat? It's like MetLife on steroids.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:58 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
But I'm talking about the shape of the tower (including the number of setbacks, etc.). I think that these "massing models" depict almost precisely what it will look like from the outside.

There is no reason to believe that the shape of the towers will be anything different from what has been revealed thus far. I think that they're both decent towers.



https://newyorkyimby.com/2018/11/270...manhattan.html

Last edited by JMKeynes; Nov 14, 2018 at 6:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 3:12 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
But I'm talking about the shape of the tower (including the number of setbacks, etc.). I think that these "massing models" depict almost precisely what it will look like from the outside.

There is no reason to believe that the shape of the towers will be anything different from what has been revealed thus far. I think that they're both decent towers.

Nobody is saying that the massing will change, although it certainly can. We're still almost two years away from this thing being under construction, and there are still options with more development rights. The massing that was depicted is where it stands now. But it gives us none of the design details of the tower.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 3:27 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
I’m quite pleased with this tower. All I’m saying is that this is very likely the shape that it will have. We’ve seen the design. I also suspect that the facade shown in the rendering of the plaza for the taller version is what we’ll get since Foster is intent on making it “respect” its neighbors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 3:59 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I’m quite pleased with this tower. All I’m saying is that this is very likely the shape that it will have. We’ve seen the design. I also suspect that the facade shown in the rendering of the plaza for the taller version is what we’ll get since Foster is intent on making it “respect” its neighbors.
That was basically a rehash of the tower as it stands. We've only seen the massing (shape) as far as what the design entails, but the details will offer far more.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 4:02 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,294
Happens all the time. A general idea to give to the city planning, and the details follow later on. As we've all be seen, proposals are submitted to city planning, but once further revisions are added, and a project continues to develop in the design change, alterations are made. Sometimes, even the massing change.

I think we are all just very excited and impatient. I know I am (the suspense hurts).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 4:58 PM
Prezrezc Prezrezc is offline
A.F.K.A. JayPro
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 851
Oh, yes indeedy it will.

Don'r forget that this and 277 have the huge bases set apart from the main "shaft". 245's sits atop the podium, which isn't much wider.

And all three's ft^2'age are justabout equal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 5:18 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
I like to compare it to 277, shown with the massing, for scale...






__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 5:39 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Foster said that it will respect the nearby International towers, so the resemblance to 277 is to be expected. I think that the façade also will be very similar to those towers but glassier.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2018, 5:40 PM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
Foster said that it will respect the nearby International towers, so the resemblance to 277 is to be expected. I think that the façade also will be very similar to those towers but glassier.
He said it would respect the character of the area. GCT and Helmsworth are right down the street...

But, I really wish Robert Stren were at the helm...Internationalism needs to die.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.