Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH
C'mon guys, let's get real here. Just because Google resides there doesn't mean they get a pass. We dish plenty of scorn out to much better looking developments. If this were proposed tomorrow you'd all be freaking out.
|
Well, I did say it was a bit of a mess . . .
I don't have a huge problem with the Urban Active portion of the project, considering all that is being wrapped around the parking structure.
The design of the hotel sucks, but that isn't really the main problem on that side.
The things I don't get are: that useless lawn along Penn; the Coffee Roasters and West Elm "out buildings" that look like they belong in a suburban mall; and that horrible little parking lot which is like 70+% driving lane.
The good news, though, is I don't see why you couldn't redevelop some or all of those particular elements some day into something more appropriate for the site. Which could also serve to hide the less-than-attractive hotel design too.