Posted Dec 1, 2021, 6:39 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Ottawa Area
Posts: 190
|
|
Okay you guys have to stop using the "golf course isn't public park" argument. This isn't what we are discussing. The situation is, once the golf course stops being a golf course, should it become a public park as it was contractually promised, or should it be exploited by greedy developers. Simple as that.
We have to be honest with ourselves. When it will be developed, it won't be a world class, environmentally friendly development. It will just be more of the same cost cutting development that will maximize profit for the builder.
Are we okay with it? should we require certain level of quality and higher standards? Can we compromise with a mixture of both park and housing?
I don't live close to Kanata, so I'm not a NIMBY, but I do care about urban planning and the living quality of the city.
|