^Apologizing for low light in a perfectly good picture? How Canadian
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo
Of course, there will be complaints that it should be downtown, but honestly, I think it's going to look really cool have two fully-fledged skylines in the city. The double skyline effect already looks neat coming down the hill from West Kelowna, and on to the bridge.
|
Glad to see my complaining is actually getting through to some of you, I was starting to wonder if anyone read my posts. What I don't understand is why you want two different skylines in a city that barely has
one. If the city planners had any vision they would have placed tall buildings downtown like they do in every other city thus Kelowna would have a skyline that might even rival Victoria's but due to them allowing development everywhere, tall buildings are spread out all over the place so when I posted this picture saying it was the best picture i've ever seen of it's skyline, I was basically mocking Kelowna for the abject lack of planning the city has had:
This looks like the downtown of a town of 50,000 people not the city center of a city of 200,000 people
According to this list, Kelowna should have 5 brand new buildings between 20-36 stories tall so it would be great to see someone with a bit of spare time around here update this page because it's almost 2 years old now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ngs_in_Kelowna
Threaded Mode