Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician
It would be easier for a large immigrant population trend to be happening without notice if it were happening in the suburbs instead of the city. It’s easy to be sort of invisible in the burbs.
I know this would probably be a lot of labor, but it would be really neat if you could produce data like this for the suburbs as well. This would especially matter since many immigrants these days move straight to the suburbs.
|
Agree. I can probably do the entire thing later, but I'm having a small look. The Mexican one is interesting. There are some places like Cicero and Waukegan each with losses of over 1000 and some others like it too, but then there's a bunch of cities with smaller changes. Could be that the Mexican born population is "spreading out" so to speak (even though they already are) and maybe going away from some of the more established bases to some smaller but still sizable communities.
Now, here's the Indian changes which is I think a bit more clear cut:
Naperville: +2597
Schaumburg: +2483
Chicago: +1458
Aurora: +1152
Hoffman Estates: +877
Lombard: +863
Buffalo Grove: +810
Des Plaines: +774
Wheeling: +658
Arlington Heights: +644
Bartlett: +545
And so on
China
Chicago: +8705
Evanston: +1034
Naperville: +836
Buffalo Grove: +450
Looks like a handful of cities so far with around +150 or +200 too like Skokie and Schaumburg.
Threaded Mode