Rural Commuter Rail

[OCCheetos]

Originally Posted by Charles5

You may wish to check out para 2.2 (b) of the City's response to CTA which clearly indicates that the 3 year plan now and in the past has stated the intention to retain the POW bridge.
https://www.letsgomoose.ca/wp-content/up...Show-Cause-Response-Case-No-17-01....pdf

I think I misinterpreted MOOSE's original document (paragraph 5) on the matter. Sorry about that.

This still leaves "b) The city dismantled part of the railway without following the proper procedures outlined in the law." up for debate.
I should also add the MOOSE's case could include "obstructing a federal railway" to their case. Either in the sense that they've literally blocked off the previous path for the rail, or they have not included adequate clearance under the Albert Street bridge.