Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth
So the City propose to remove the viaducts because they say the structures are not built to today's seismic standards and are ugly. Then they propose to repurpose part of the viaduct for a park. Doesn't that contradict their original excuse for removing the structure?
|
Apparently, the part the City wants to keep is on solid ground.
Also, they're very obsessed with the High Line.
Threaded Mode