HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 4:24 PM
_Matt _Matt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
So you're advocating for them to have:

1) spurred off from the existing red line
2) added a new crossing (and interruptions) of Burnet Road
3) added new track into the Domain
4) added a bunch of new crossings into the interior roads of the Domain
5) Even though the Domain didn't want them!
6) then crossing (and closing) Burnet _again_.
7) And doing this brand new construction for the price of $0 (CapMetro was essentially bankrupt).
8) Even though the _existing_ track and station is more central to the overall North Burnet area (you'd be spending Million$ to move the rail, and then later you'd want to move it back anyway).



Then it's a good thing that's what they did (added the 466 with timed transfers from the red line).
Jesus dude, chill. No wonder people avoid getting into conversations with you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.