HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2015, 5:32 AM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
AADT is not the only reason to upgrade a highway. If a road is particularly unsafe and dividing it will make it safer, then why not do it.

If you only use one singular reason to upgrade a highway then many divided highways outside of the cities would not have been done for a much longer time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
I also believe Ontario Northland Railway would still be in service had Highway 11 not been twinned.
Indeed, the money that was put into the highway could have made the Northlander faster than driving. I quoted swimmer_spe too because the argument for twinning lightly travelled highways is usually safety. But no amount of highway upgrades can make driving as safe as taking the train. People in cars die at a rate of 7.3 per billion passenger-miles, compared to 0.15 per billion on trains. Those numbers are staggering. So by abandoning the rail service and putting that money into Highway 11 instead, the government has made travelling to North Bay more dangerous than ever. The safety argument completely falls apart when you look at it that way.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.