Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry
Both posts were defending td place not sure what you're trying to get at?  But to answer your question..It's a Great Stadium that suites the eastern CFL perfectly at a budget less than half of what other cities are paying. You cant tell me THF is twice as good as TD place just because the price tag was twice as much? It needs some more amenities yes. Is it the devil? God no Go pick on Calgary or Montreal
It's not crumbling. Get a grip. Pieces if the thin layer of concrete meant to blend the 2 slabs in the 70's is falling off. big deal theirs nothing structurally wrong with it. Put something to cover it and you wont even notice the tiny bit of weathering.
You guys are acting like this Stadium isn't acceptable and its kind of annoying
Remember the jewel of the CFL in 2010 |
man relax, its a forum, we're allowed to express our opinions without being personally attacked.
why are you taking our opinion so personally? who the hell said TD place was the devil? who said it isn't acceptable?
I said this....
Quote:
Originally Posted by king10
I think all they had to do was spend some money on restoring the concrete facade. I still hold out hope that they will wrap the stands around at least one endzone when demand warrants it.
|
Not sure how that equates to TD Place being "the devil and not being an acceptable stadium" I said the concrete on the facade is crumbling, you said its falling off, different words, same thing yet your interpretation of the meaning is right and mine is wrong?
sheesh man
they spent $85 million on the stadium reno. it serves its purpose very well. no questions about that
all we're saying is it wouldve been nice if they could have given the concrete some TLC to freshen up its appearance. Thats all.
and why the heck would i pick on Calgary or MTL. Those stadiums are decades old and haven't seen a substantial renovation in decades. No doubt they're in worse shape than TD place. and for good reason.
Threaded Mode