HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2013, 9:42 PM
Vercingetorix's Avatar
Vercingetorix Vercingetorix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 363
Considering Calgary's is not constrained by water or other geography, its core is surrounded by 360 degrees of develop-able land, and it's a young city that has developed during the automobile age, it's a marvel that they do have the amount of high-rise residential in the core that they have.

City planning has had some part in all of that. Although not a popular decision, the city a long time ago decided to limit parking downtown and promote light rail transit. Today you have an expansive LRT system and TODs that are evolving rapidly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeJay View Post
Im not sure what you're trying to convey. Toronto has been building taller. Calgary has not focuses on its core anymore than most other Canadian cities. As you've mentioned: Calgary has an urban sprawl issue, so they are not building their city quite as 'right' as I would hope, nor are they learning from the mistakes of older cities in this particular sense.

I appreciate Calgary's forms of public transit. Older cities need more LRT lines.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.