HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 6:16 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,820
now correct me if i'm wrong, but i seem to remember (but i can not seem to confirm) that one of the reasons for the trouble of the waterfront stadium was because of the dangerous goods the trains may carry and its potential conflict with the stadium.

if this is true, how can they build office towers above the tracks?

edit: found something from the province
http://www2.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=d45ca4c9-75a5-46a5-8507-0a190f09c26a

to sum it up, the issues for not approve the stadium were


Quote

THE ISSUES WERE:

- Providing an adequate street network.

- Resolving the risks associated with dangerous goods in adjacent rail yards.

- Reconfiguring the stadium to ensure a better fit with heritage Gastown.

- Resolving impacts on the livability of residential areas south of the rail lands.

- Resolving impacts on future port development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:35 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.