HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2025, 3:17 AM
Yuri's Avatar
Yuri Yuri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,156
I decided to do the same exercise for US cities in 1950. I used city proper and I kept adding suburbs that had a high density (above 2,000 inh./km²):

------------------------- Population 1950 ------ Area ------- Density
Code:
New York ---- 10,244,422 -- 1,255 km² ---- 8,160 inh./km²

Chicago ------ 3,930,506 ---- 670 km² ---- 5,863 inh./km²

Detroit ------ 2,048,410 ---- 414 km² ---- 4,951 inh./km²

Montreal ----- 1,164,133 ---- 164 km² ---- 7,098 inh./km²

Cleveland ---- 1,082,067 ---- 245 km² ---- 4,544 inh./km²

St. Louis ---- 1,044,363 ---- 233 km² ---- 4,486 inh./km²

Pittsburgh --- 1,038,137 ---- 263 km² ---- 3,940 inh./km²

Toronto -------- 889,869 ---- 142 km² ---- 6,267 inh./km²

Cincinnati ----- 708,469 ---- 256 km² ---- 2,768 inh./km²

Milwaukee ------ 637,392 ---- 129 km² ---- 4,922 inh./km²

Buffalo -------- 600,198 ---- 108 km² ---- 5,394 inh./km²
It's crazy to see how dense, urban and big northern US cities were back then.

P.S. For Americans, 1 sqm = 2.59 km².
__________________
London - São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Londrina - Frankfurt
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.