Quote:
Originally Posted by missing_middle
Everyone who talks like this conveniently places the entire "burden of proof" on Pollievere and uses a form of circular reasoning for Carney.
Carney's more qualified -> point out x policy/view that would be negative for the economy -> doesn't matter he's more qualified, also I hate Pollievere, unlikeable
Ok...but not a really convincing argument beyond "I don't like Pollievere"
|
have you noticed the polls changing? The burden of proof is on the guy who lost a 27 point lead...has nothing to do with my opinion of Pierre.
Threaded Mode