Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes
I hate that street too. There's plenty of jagged stumps on Hamilton too. I'm okay if they aren't going to plant new trees, but don't leave hazards for people to find underneath the snow. I'm with Drofmab and fill them in if you aren't going to do something about them in the next three months.
|
I'm not sure the mechanism used in other cities, but often the property owner is responsible right to the curb all around their building... some might view this as a burden, but it's also a great opportunity to extend your company/hotel's street presence.
For example, the sidewalks on the Rose & Hamilton sides of the Delta aren't aesthetically pleasing... no trees, benches, planters, etc. I bet if the conditions were right, the Delta would agree to assume responsibility for the space between their building an the roadway - adding planters, benches, maybe even fixing the sidewalk.
As it sits, the Delta may wish to do something to improve the sidewalks & curb appeal around their building, but it's not their property, and they would likely run into resistance from the City if they tried to do something. I think this is unfortunate.
Other cities (Ottawa, Toronto & Vancouver jump to mind) clearly have something worked out with downtown landowners (beyond simply ensuring the sidewalk is shoveled in the winter)... I bet if we put on our creativity hat, we could come up with something here that would improve the look of downtown, decrease efforts & direct costs borne by the City (even if it were a tax offset in recognition of the landowner defraying the City's costs by assuming a role in sidewalk/curb work), and potentially make landowners happier. Of course, there'd still need some standards, so they don't impede pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk; or create a real hazard - but this isn't insurmountable.