HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted May 13, 2014, 2:39 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Maybe we will one day get our high-speed rail connection to the US - thanks to China.
Or Russia, or some other hair brained scheme.

I'll file this under "believe it when I see it".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted May 13, 2014, 6:40 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
meanwhile, back at the ranch .....

It might be a very good idea to start figuring and planning on some HSR, or commuter rail for the LowerMainland, like (depending on demand) upping the frequency of the WCE or planning commuter rail to Abbotsford, as examples.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted May 13, 2014, 6:43 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I'll file this under "believe it when I see it".
Surely, but technically it could be done. Unfortunately if it would happen, it would more than likely skip Vancouver ans Seattle and travel from Alaska towards Edmonton and Alberta before crossing the border into States. Going around the mountains would save this gigantic project hundreds of billions.

I guess that if this would be built, it would be for cargo. Container traffic may face problems when we run out of oil, so a rail connection would be required. For passenger traffic I can see such mega-railway viable only if we fail to come up with any good alternative for jet fuel. But seeing how well solar energy on small planes is progressing, I would imagine that passenger air traffic will be there also in the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted May 13, 2014, 9:05 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vancity View Post
they're all white people. LOL.
Substitute "white" with "asian" or "black" and the comment is suddenly racist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted May 13, 2014, 10:51 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Substitute "white" with "asian" or "black" and the comment is suddenly racist.
They're all Asian people.

They're all black people.

Nope, not racist but nice try.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted May 14, 2014, 3:08 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
Plus, the people in the photo are all white people.

Quote:
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted May 14, 2014, 7:21 PM
Genauso's Avatar
Genauso Genauso is offline
A hole being Doug
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 498
This video looks like it will be appropriate
View from the BCER Interurban running from Marpole to Steveston
Video Link


Has Surrey recently tried lobbying the Federal government to fund a Via Rail service? I know there's West Coast express and Go Train, but given there's virtually no presence for the crown corporation and they couldn't lose too much money compared to the PR value...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted May 14, 2014, 7:51 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Assuming it was city workers but it looks like they're dismantling the Granville Island streetcar station shelters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted May 14, 2014, 11:20 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
It might be a very good idea to start figuring and planning on some HSR, or commuter rail for the LowerMainland, like (depending on demand) upping the frequency of the WCE or planning commuter rail to Abbotsford, as examples.
Only HSR that would be viable would be to Seattle. Anywhere else would not generate enough revenue, or would be horrendously expensive.

WCE needs to expand. It has not expanded since its inception in 1995. GO and AMT have all expanded multiple times over.

They have existing rail in place that would service the ferries. They have existing rail that would service other communities in the GVA.

It is sad that a "green" city is not as green as other major cities in Canada.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted May 15, 2014, 12:21 AM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
Wonder how feasible it would be to extend WCE south from Mission into Abbotsford and have it start there. Only issue is the Mission station is east of the junction, and would have to be relocated slightly west or maybe have half the trains short turn there.

However, the rain line from Mission to Abbotsford is under CP's jurisdiction, which also maintains and operates the current WCE line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted May 15, 2014, 2:47 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
Wonder how feasible it would be to extend WCE south from Mission into Abbotsford and have it start there. Only issue is the Mission station is east of the junction, and would have to be relocated slightly west or maybe have half the trains short turn there.

However, the rain line from Mission to Abbotsford is under CP's jurisdiction, which also maintains and operates the current WCE line.
Why not just add another two trains and have some terminate in Mission and others in Abbotsford.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted May 15, 2014, 7:51 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Why not just add another two trains and have some terminate in Mission and others in Abbotsford.
Makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 2:25 AM
jlenko jlenko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Willoughby
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
However, the rain line from Mission to Abbotsford is under CP's jurisdiction, which also maintains and operates the current WCE line.
Isn't the WCE operated by Bombardier now?I thought CP was out of it, after E.H.H wanted nothing to do with passenger rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 3:18 AM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlenko View Post
Isn't the WCE operated by Bombardier now?I thought CP was out of it, after E.H.H wanted nothing to do with passenger rail.
I don't know who operates it, but I do know the WCE runs on CP trackage most, if not all of the way from Mission to Waterfront.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 2:55 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
I don't know who operates it, but I do know the WCE runs on CP trackage most, if not all of the way from Mission to Waterfront.
I don't think it is a big issue. Take Via rail as an example, in most of the country they run on CN track. The fraser valley being he exception when coming into the city they in one track and going out they run on the other railways tracks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 5:21 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Given this, there seems flexibility to develop the WCE. Although perhaps
for the moment, this is satisafactory, as metro grows, other commuter rail lines may open.

But for the current WCE, having Mission-Vancouver, and a longer Abbotsford-Vancouver IMO would be an expedient way to go, given our geography. The line such as suggested would seemingly well serve the commuter distribution. I hope equally that the frequency is increased with a possible mid-day train and an evening train.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 5:31 PM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Only HSR that would be viable would be to Seattle. Anywhere else would not generate enough revenue, or would be horrendously expensive.

WCE needs to expand. It has not expanded since its inception in 1995. GO and AMT have all expanded multiple times over.

They have existing rail in place that would service the ferries. They have existing rail that would service other communities in the GVA.

It is sad that a "green" city is not as green as other major cities in Canada.
It depends on what you call HSR. Yes, it might not be affordable to build true HSR anywhere other than Seattle bound, but relatively high speed rail to other locations would benefit this province. If travel times to Hope on a train were comparable to driving it could open up the entire Fraser Valley to Vancouver much like GO and Via open up the entire Golden Horseshoe to Toronto. And while GO has 7 lines, you could hit most of the Valley with just 1.

And frequent (like every few hours) trains out to Hope could open up the rest of the province to more travel. Instead of getting on a crowded bus Downtown, you could ride the train to Hope, where Greyhound would have their terminal and buses would depart from there for the rest of the province saving the traveler an hour of time and simplifying Greyhounds operation in the process. The most direct bus to Hope takes 1:45, with most being 2:45.

If you spend the money and build fast rail all the way to Kamloops, then this province would get a little bit smaller feeling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlenko View Post
Isn't the WCE operated by Bombardier now?I thought CP was out of it, after E.H.H wanted nothing to do with passenger rail.
It is, just this week they took over I think. But before them it was VIA rail, not CP who ran and maintained the trains.

It will be interesting to see if this changes anything. As important as VIA rail is to the country, to me it feels like VIA is looking for any excuse to not exist (at least outside southern Ontario). Maybe Bombardier will have some ideas to help improve service that VIA would have kept to themselves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 5:58 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
..........
It is, just this week they took over I think. But before them it was VIA rail, not CP who ran and maintained the trains.

It will be interesting to see if this changes anything. As important as VIA rail is to the country, to me it feels like VIA is looking for any excuse to not exist (at least outside southern Ontario). Maybe Bombardier will have some ideas to help improve service that VIA would have kept to themselves.

I think this is quite likely, not only because Bombardier is not "Southern Ontario" -centred in its thinking, but also because
providing good service is good PR for the company. This is worth taking into consideration, IMO, because although in the case of WCE, they are managemement, and also the passenger car manufacturers, that they manufacture often-inventive commuter rail, (even used here in Paris, on a lot of trains out of Gare St. Lazare) including the engines.
(WCE engines being G.E.) ... and that although there is competition out there, (such as Alstom, its TGV and so on) the snazziest trains usually come from the Bombardier factory.
They have every reason to show their product at its best, and that is what may most benefit Valley commuters, be it a Mission or Abbotsford train.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 9:20 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
If travel times to Hope on a train were comparable to driving it could open up the entire Fraser Valley to Vancouver much like GO and Via open up the entire Golden Horseshoe to Toronto.
The Golden Horseshoe was opened up by roads and freeways, GO came along after that. Of course it's helped the densification of the area, but GO would never have gone there in the first place unless there was a critical mass of riders to use it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 1:19 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
It depends on what you call HSR. Yes, it might not be affordable to build true HSR anywhere other than Seattle bound, but relatively high speed rail to other locations would benefit this province. If travel times to Hope on a train were comparable to driving it could open up the entire Fraser Valley to Vancouver much like GO and Via open up the entire Golden Horseshoe to Toronto. And while GO has 7 lines, you could hit most of the Valley with just 1.
There just isn't any economic reason to extend a high-speed (or even low-speed) line out to Hope, which has a population of 6,000.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.