Quote:
Originally Posted by IanS
I agree completely, at least for those who didn't cause too much damage or assault anyone.
|
While I tend to agree, at least in principle, that one deserves a second chance, I think we are all down playing the seriousness of these charges. We are not talking about losing one's temper and hitting someone, or partaking in a shop lifting, we are talking about wiful damage to property that endangered bystanders and the emergency services workers.
These are serious civil disorder offences, and the notion of punishment in our system are (a) rehabilition; and (b) general detterence. It is essentially not what is best for the individual to heal, but for the public interest - that is, it's not about him, it's about us. I suspect that the public will demand serious consequences for what happended. Arson offences are generally not hybrid offences and are straight indictable. No fine (summary offences can be dealt with by $2000 fine or max 6 months in jail - but not straight indictable offences).
Arson offences under the criminal code are serious. Mischief by arson is a 14 year max sentence (unless one is a youth convicted under the Youth Criminal Justice Act).
Arson -- damage to property
434. Every person who intentionally or recklessly causes damage by fire or explosion to property that is not wholly owned by that person is guilty of
an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 434; 1990, c. 15, s. 1.
Lukily for anyone a youth at the time, they will, by default, get a second chance. As for adults, i don't believe that they deserve one.