HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted May 30, 2025, 7:18 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
BIRT as Skytrain? Decades away.
BIRT as BRT? Likely in service before UBCx on the current bridge.
If you count the R2 extension as BIRT, then it will likely be in service before the first leg of the Broadway subway is opened.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted May 30, 2025, 9:15 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,536
The R2 extension deserves no acknowledgement as any sort of BIRT.

We may as well say that UBCx is already completed. The 99 runs to UBC doesn't it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted May 30, 2025, 9:29 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
If you count the R2 extension as BIRT
No, I wasn't, and Translink has been clear they don't eigther.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted May 30, 2025, 10:58 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 904
Great that the R2 extension got funded in any case. Time to change all the system maps again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 12:48 AM
svlt svlt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 987
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 7:19 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,405
We need 100% funding commitment mid 2026 construction to start in late 2027/early 2028 opening in 2031/32. Also the SFU Gondola needs to be under construction before end of 2027. Metrotown to Brentwood also needs to be un construction in less then 4 years. then we can breath.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 5:05 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedArbutus View Post
Honestly I've been half-wondering why they didn't just go with cut and cover if the bored tunnel route had this much disruption and closure anyway. If you have businesses complaining non-stop regardless, might as well save a cool $1-2 billion and cut and cover over a few years....?
Moving to the UBCx thread.

This is what will need to happen to keep UBCx from getting out of hand on a $ per km basis like the Arbutus extension did. Will be interesting to see what the business case assumes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 5:56 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Moving to the UBCx thread.

This is what will need to happen to keep UBCx from getting out of hand on a $ per km basis like the Arbutus extension did. Will be interesting to see what the business case assumes.
The tunnel itself doesn't cost a huge amount more, it is given ground conditions, how shallow can you make the station boxes with a bored tunnel.

I think with how the route goes 'cross country' a bit, boring is assumed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 6:26 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Moving to the UBCx thread.

This is what will need to happen to keep UBCx from getting out of hand on a $ per km basis like the Arbutus extension did. Will be interesting to see what the business case assumes.
In 2019 it was estimated to be $2.83bn. It's now $2.95bn. That doesn't seem to have got out of hand? For 5.7km, mostly in bored tunnels, it's $518m/km. For comparison, where there's no tunneling, the Surrey-Langley line is currently estimated at $5.996bn or $375/km.

Building infrastructure isn't cheap almost anywhere in North America these days. If you look at the worldwide dataset, we're well below the most expensive.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 7:14 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,513
Just a reminder, that UBC is by far the country's largest university campus to lack rapid transit. York University, surrounded by industrial park, has 2 palatial stations. Both the University of Ottawa and Carlton University have rapid transit. Even the University of Alberta in Edmonton has rapid transit, complete with a 2nd station for its south campus! It's an outrage that they'd go through the trouble of an extension and not bring it to the single biggest destination that would make the extension worthwhile. Make it an election issue!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 7:37 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Just a reminder, that UBC is by far the country's largest university campus to lack rapid transit. York University, surrounded by industrial park, has 2 palatial stations. Both the University of Ottawa and Carlton University have rapid transit. Even the University of Alberta in Edmonton has rapid transit, complete with a 2nd station for its south campus! It's an outrage that they'd go through the trouble of an extension and not bring it to the single biggest destination that would make the extension worthwhile. Make it an election issue!
Is SFU the 2nd largest then?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 9:35 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Is SFU the 2nd largest then?
By enrollment based on the Wiki page, it would be the University of Western Ontario in London. McMaster would currently be the third (although they will have an LRT soon-ish, usually I wouldn't count LRTs as "rapid" transit but for this I will). Laval (also getting a LRT), Queen's, Guelph, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and UVic all have larger enrollment than SFU without any better-than-a-bus transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2025, 9:42 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
In 2019 it was estimated to be $2.83bn. It's now $2.95bn. That doesn't seem to have got out of hand? For 5.7km, mostly in bored tunnels, it's $518m/km. For comparison, where there's no tunneling, the Surrey-Langley line is currently estimated at $5.996bn or $375/km.

Building infrastructure isn't cheap almost anywhere in North America these days. If you look at the worldwide dataset, we're well below the most expensive.
Point taken, the Broadway Subway is very much in hand cost wise. I like that website, very informative that we're landing somewhere in the realm of expected costs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:12 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.